DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Parametric Analysis of Building Energy Impact of Semi-transparent PV

STPV의 건물 에너지 성능에 대한 파라메트릭 분석

  • 곽인규 (서울시립대학교 대학원) ;
  • 문선혜 (서울시립대학교 대학원) ;
  • 허정호 (서울시립대학교 건축공학과)
  • Received : 2018.02.12
  • Accepted : 2018.06.24
  • Published : 2018.07.30

Abstract

Semi-transparent Photovoltaics (STPV) works as an exterior material replacing windows as well as functioning as a electricity generator. As a result, it also affects the building's heating, cooling and lighting loads. In this study, we used the concept of Net Electricity Benefit(NEB) to conduct a parametric analysis of building energy impact of STPV. The NEB of STPV is from $-1kWh/m^2$ to $6kWh/m^2$. Since NEB represents the amount of energy increase or decrease when STPV is applied compared to the standard window, a value of 0 or less means that the demand for building energy can be increased rather than applying a general window having high thermal performance and high visible light transmittance value. Therefore, it is necessary to perform a comprehensive performance evaluation considering both the performance evaluation based on the existing power generation performance and the influence on the building energy.

Keywords

References

  1. ASHRAE(2010). Energy standard for buildings except low-rise residential buildings.
  2. Cornaro, C., Renzi, L., Perro, M., Carlo, A., & Guglielmotti, A. (2018). Thermal and Electrical Characterization of a Semi-Transparent Dye-Sensitized Photovoltaic Module under Real Operating Conditions, Energies, 11(1), 155. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11010155
  3. Do, S., Shin, M., Baltazar, J., & Kim, J. (2017). Energy benefits from semi-transparent BIPV window and daylight-dimming systems for IECC code-compliance residential buildings in hot and humid climates, Solar Energy, 155, 291-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2017.06.039
  4. Eom, J., Jang, H., & Yoon, S. (2013). The Status Analysis of BIPV System Module in Public Buildings Based on Obligation System of New & Renewable Energy, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 29(4), 259-266. https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_PD.2013.29.4.259
  5. Departmetn of energy(2016). Guidelines for energy management.
  6. Heinstein, P., Ballif, C., & Perret-Aebi, L. (2013). Building Integrated Photovoltaics (BIPV): Review, Potentials, Barriers and Myths, Green, 3, 2.
  7. Jeong Y., Jung H., Jang H., & Yu K. (2014). A Study on the Reference Building based on the Building Design Trends for Non-residential Buildings. Journal of the Korean Solar Energy Society, 34(3), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.7836/KSES.2014.34.3.001
  8. Kapsis, K., & Athienitis, A. (2015). A study of the potential benefits of semi-transparent photovoltaics in commercial buildings, Solar Energy, 115, 120-132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2015.02.016
  9. Kim, B., & Yoon, J. (2013). An Experiment Study on Surface Temperature and Power Output Characteristics of a-Si Thin Film BIPV Window, The Society Of Air-Conditioning And Refrigerating Engineers Of Korea 2013 conference, 347-351.
  10. Kim, D., Yoon, J., & Lee, K. (2012). A Energy Performance Evaluation of Double Skin Facade system with Transparent BIPV. Korean Institute of Architectural Sustainable Environment and Building Systems Conference, 145-150.
  11. Korea Energy Agency(2016). Regulation on the Energy Efficiency Rating Certification System for Buildings.
  12. Lee, S., & Huh, J. (2016). A study on the performance of various BIPV modules applied in a real building demonstration, Journal of the Korean Solar Energy Society, 36(2), 53-63. https://doi.org/10.7836/kses.2016.36.2.053
  13. Lee, S. (2016). Development of BIPV Power Generation Prediction Algorithm for Mock-up Analysis, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of seoul.
  14. Li,, D., Lam, T., Chan, W., & Mak, A. (2009). Energy and cost analysis of semi-transparent photovoltaic in office buildings, Applied Energy, 86, 722-729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.08.009
  15. Lopez, C., & Sangiorgi, M. (2014). Comparison assessment of BIPV facade semi-transparent modules: further insights on human comfort conditions, Energy Procedia, 48, 1419-1428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.02.160
  16. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport(2017). Energy saving design standard of building.
  17. National fenestration rating council(2013). Procedure for determining fenestration product solar heat gain coefficient and visible transmittance at normal incidence, 25.
  18. Ng, P., Mithraratne, N., & Kua, H. (2013). Energy analysis of semi-transparent BIPV in Singapore buildings, Energy and Buildings, 66, 274-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.07.029
  19. Yoon, J,. Oh, M., & Shin U. (2012). Annual base performance evaluation on cell temperature and power generation of c-Si transparent spandrel BIPV Module depending on the Backside Insulation Level, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 28(2), 241-250. https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_PD.2012.28.2.241
  20. Yoon, J., Shin, U., Oh, M., & Park J. (2011). Effective BIPV application method for reduction of building energy consumption at high-rised office building, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 28(2), 27(8), 333-342