한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 논문집 (Journal of the Korea institute for structural maintenance and inspection)

  • 제22권1호
  • /
  • Pages.199-207
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2234-6937(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-6979(eISSN)
한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 (Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance Inspection)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

이중 보강근을 가지는 FRC 보의 휨성능

Flexural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Concrete Beams with Hybrid Double-layer Reinforcing Bars

  • 김성은 (한밭대학교 건축공학과 대학원) ;
  • 김승훈 (한밭대학교 건축공학과)
  • 투고 : 2017.12.18
  • 심사 : 2017.12.19
  • 발행 : 2018.01.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이형철근과 FRP 보강근의 복합 이중근을 갖는 FRC 보의 휨성능을 평가하기 위하여 실험이 수행되었다. 인장근의 종류(CFRP 보강근, GFRP 보강근, 철근)과 PVA 섬유 혼입률(0.5%, 0%)을 주요변수로 한 7개의 실험체를 제작하였다. 유한요소해석을 통하여 FRC 보의 균열 및 휨거동을 예측하기 위한 해석적 방법이 제안되고 분석되었다. 복합 이중근을 가지는 실험체들에서 철근으로 이중근을 가지는 실험체가 철근과 FRP 보강근을 이단으로 배치한 실험체들에 비하여 26~34% 균열하중이 큰 것으로 나타났다. 최대 휨강도에서는 복합 이중근을 가지는 실험체들 중 CFRP 보강근을 최외측으로 한 실험체가 가장 큰 내력을 나타내었다. 해석과 실험을 통한 휨강도를 비교한 결과, 강도비는 평균 1.2, 표준편차 0.085, 최대 오차율은 22% 등으로 나타났다. 이러한 결과에서 본 연구의 유한요소해석방법이 복합 이중근을 가지는 보의 실제 거동을 효과적으로 표현할 수 있음을 알 수 있다.

Experimental programs were performed to evaluate the flexural performance of fiber reinforced concrete(FRC) beams using a hybrid double-layer arrangement of steel bars and fiber reinforced polymer(FRP) bars or using FRP bars only. A total of seven beam specimens were produced with type of tensile reinforcing bar(CFRP bar, GFRP bar, steel bar) and the poly vinyl alcohol(PVA) fiber mixing ratio(0.5%, 0%) as variable. An analysis method for predicting the flexural behaviors of FRC beams with hybrid arrangement of heterogeneous reinforcing bars through finite element analysis was proposed and verified. In case of the specimens with the double-layer reinforcing bars, the test results showed that the first cracking load of specimen with a double-layer arrangement of steel bars was greater by 26-34% than specimens with a hybrid double-layer arrangement of steel and FRP bars. In maximum flexural strengths, the specimen that used CFRP bars as bottom tensile reinforcing bar showed the greatest strength among the specimens with the double-layer reinforcing bars. When the maximum moment value obtained through experiments was compared with that obtained through analysis, the ratio was 1.2 on average, the standard deviation was 0.085, and the maximum error rate was 22% or less. Based on these results, the finite element analysis model proposed in this study can effectively simulate the actual behavior of the beams with hybrid double-layer reinforcing bars.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. ACI 440.1R-15. (2015), Guide for the Design and Construction of Structural Concrete Reinforced with Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Bars, American Concrete Institute.
  2. Aiello, M. A., and Ombres, L. (2002), Structural performances of concrete beams with hybrid (fiber-reinforced polymer-steel) reinforcements, Journal of Composites for Construction, 6(2), 133-140. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0268(2002)6:2(133)
  3. Barris, C., Torres, L. I., Turon, A., Baena, M., and Catalan, A. (2009), An experimental study of the flexural behaviour of GFRP RC beams and comparison with prediction models. Compos Struct, 91 286-295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2009.05.005
  4. CAN/CSA S806-02. (2002), Design and Construction of Building Components with Fibre Reinforced Polymers, Canadian Standards Association.
  5. CEB-FIP Model Code 90. (1990), Model code for concrete structures, Comite Euro-International du Beton, Bulletin, 213-214.
  6. JSCE (1997), Recommendation for design and construction of concrete structures using continuous fiber reinforcing materials, JSCE Concrete Engineeering Series 23.
  7. Kim, S. E., and Kim, S. H. (2016), Finite Element Analysis of Beams with FRP Bars and Steel Bars, Conference Proceeding of Korea Concrete Institute, 28(2), 83-84.
  8. Leung, H. Y., and Balendran, R. V. (2003), Flexural behaviour of concrete beams internally reinforced with GFRP rods and steel rebars, Structural Survey, 21(4), 146-157. https://doi.org/10.1108/02630800310507159
  9. Safan, M. A. (2013), Flexural behavior and design of steel-GFRP reinforced concrete beams, ACI Materials Journal, 110 (6), 677-685.
  10. Shield, C., Galambos, T., and Gulbrandsen, P. (2011), On the History and Reliability of the Flexural Strength of FRP Reinforced Concrete Members in ACI 440.1R, 10th International Symposium on Fiber Reinforced Polymer Reinforcement for Concrete Structures, SP-275, American Concrete Institute, 1-18.
  11. Soliman, S. M., El-Salakawy, E., and Benmokrane, B. (2011), Bond performance of near-surface mounted FRP bars, J Compos Constr, 15(1), 103-111. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000150
  12. Yang, J. M., Yoo, D. Y., Shin, H. O., and Yoon, Y. S. (2011), Flexural Strength and Deflection Evaluation for FRP Bar Reinforced HSC Beams with Different Types of Reinforcing Bar and Fiber, Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute, 23(4), 413-420. https://doi.org/10.4334/JKCI.2011.23.4.413
  13. Yoon, Y. S., Yang, J. M., Min, K. H., and Shin, H. O. (2011), Flexural strength and deflection characteristics of high-strength concrete beams with hybrid FRP and steel bar reinforcement, American Concrete Institute, SP275, 57-77.
  14. Yost, J. R., Gross, S. P., and Dinehart, D. W. (2003), Effective moment of inertia for glass fiberreinforced polymer-reinforced concrete beams, ACI Struct. J., 100(6), 732-739.