DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of Landsat-based Downscaling Algorithm for SMAP Soil Moisture Footprints

SMAP 토양수분을 위한 Landsat 기반 상세화 기법 개발

  • Lee, Taehwa (School of Agricultural Civil & Bio-Industrial Engineering, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kim, Sangwoo (School of Agricultural Civil & Bio-Industrial Engineering, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Shin, Yongchul (School of Agricultural Civil & Bio-Industrial Engineering, Kyungpook National University)
  • Received : 2018.05.30
  • Accepted : 2018.06.18
  • Published : 2018.07.31

Abstract

With increasing satellite-based RS(Remotely Sensed) techniques, RS soil moisture footprints have been providing for various purposes at the spatio-temporal scales in hydrology, agriculture, etc. However, their coarse resolutions still limit the applicability of RS soil moisture to field regions. To overcome these drawbacks, the LDA(Landsat-based Downscaling Algorithm) was developed to downscale RS soil moisture footprints from the coarse- to finer-scales. LDA estimates Landsat-based soil moisture($30m{\times}30m$) values in a spatial domain, and then the weighting values based on the Landsat-based soil moisture estimates were derived at the finer-scale. Then, the coarse-scale RS soil moisture footprints can be downscaled based on the derived weighting values. The LW21(Little Washita) site in Oklahoma(USA) was selected to validate the LDA scheme. In-situ soil moisture data measured at the multiple sampling locations that can reprent the airborne sensing ESTAR(Electronically Scanned Thinned Array Radiometer, $800m{\times}800m$) scale were available at the LW21 site. LDA downscaled the ESTAR soil moisture products, and the downscaled values were validated with the in-situ measurements. The soil moisture values downscaled from ESTAR were identified well with the in-situ measurements, although uncertainties exist. Furthermore, the SMAP(Soil Moisture Active & Passive, $9km{\times}9km$) soil moisture products were downscaled by the LDA. Although the validation works have limitations at the SMAP scale, the downscaled soil moisture values can represent the land surface condition. Thus, the LDA scheme can downscale RS soil moisture products with easy application and be helpful for efficient water management plans in hydrology, agriculture, environment, etc. at field regions.

Keywords

References

  1. Entekhabi D., E.G. Njoku, P.E. O'Neill, K.H. Kellogg, W.T. Crow, W.N. Edelstein, J.K. Entin, S.D. Goodman, T.J. Jackson, J. Johnson, J. Kimball, J.R. Piepmeier, R.D. Koster, N. Martin, K.C. McDonald, M. Moghaddam, S. Moran, R. Reichle, J.C. Shi, M.W. Spencer, S.W. Thurman, L. Tsang, and J. Van Zyl, 2010. The soil moisture active passive (SMAP) mission. Proceedings of the IEEE, 98(5): 704-716.
  2. Kerr Y.H., P. Waldteufel, J.P. Wigneron, J.M. Martinuzzi, J. Font, and M. Berger, 2001. Soil moisture retrieval from space: The soil moisture and ocean salinity (SMOS) mission. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 39(8): 1729-1735. https://doi.org/10.1109/36.942551
  3. Kim G.S., and E.R. Lee, 2004. Development a downscaling method of remotely-sensed soil moisture data using neural networks and ancillary data. Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, 37(1): 21-29(in Korean). https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2004.37.1.021
  4. Merlin O., G. Chehbouni, Y. Kerr, E.G. Njoku, and D. Entekhabi, 2005. A Combined modeling and Multi-Spectral /Multi-Resolution remote sensing approach for disaggregation of surface soil moisture: application to SMOS configuration. Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 43(9): 2036-2050, doi:10.1109/tgrs.2005. 853192.
  5. Merlin O., C. Rudiger, A. Al Bitar, J.P. Walker, and Y.H. Kerr, 2012. Disaggregation of SMOS soil moisture in Southeastern Australia. Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 50(5): 1556-1571. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2011.2175000
  6. Mohanty B.P. and T.H. Skaggs, 2001. Spatio-temporal evolution and time-stable characteristics of soil moisture within remote sensing footprints varying soil, slope, and vegetation. Advances in Water Resources, 24: 1051-1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(01)00034-3
  7. Njoku E.G., T.L. Jackson, V. Lakshmi, T. Chan, and S.V. Nghiem, 2003. Soil moisture retrieval from AMSR-E. IEEE transactions on Geoscience and remote sensing, 41: 215-229. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2002.808243
  8. Na S., K. Lee, S. Baek, and S. Hong, 2015. Spatial downscaling of AMSR2 soil moisture content using soil texture and field measurements. Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer, 48(6): 571-581(in Korean). https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2015.48.6.571
  9. Scott C.A., W.G.M. Bastiaanssen, and M.D. Ahmad, 2003. Mapping root zone soil moisture using remotely sensed optical imagery. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 129(5): 362-335.
  10. Shin Y., and B.P. Mohanty, 2013. Development of a deterministic downscaling algorithm for remote sensing soil moisture footprint using soil and vegetation classifications. Water Resources Research, 49: 1-21, doi:10.1002/wrce.20495.