한국농공학회논문집 (Journal of The Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers)

  • 제60권4호
  • /
  • Pages.15-25
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1738-3692(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2093-7709(eISSN)
한국농공학회 (The Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

재해분석을 통한 농업토목공사의 공종별 위험성 평가

Risk Assessment of Agricultural Construction Works using Accident Analysis and Analytic Hierarchy Process

  • Yang, Young Jin (Korea Rural Community Corporation, Rural Research Institute) ;
  • Oh, Sue Hoon (Korea Rural Community Corporation, Rural Research Institute) ;
  • Noh, Jae Kyoung (Department of Agricultural and Rural Engineering, Chungnam National University)
  • 투고 : 2018.04.19
  • 심사 : 2018.05.28
  • 발행 : 2018.07.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The accident risk at the construction workplace associated with agricultural engineering is comparatively higher than those of other fields due mainly to its complex work types and processes. Agricultural engineering deals with a variety of agricultural infrastructures from irrigation and drainage facilities to giant-scale coastal reclamation land infrastructures. The characteristics that most agricultural projects have conducted on a small-scale even worsen the situation drawing low attentions to risk management. Therefore, systematical risk assessment that focuses on details of agricultural construction work process is required in order to enhance safety management capacity and to prevent repetitive accidents ultimately. This study aims to categorize construction work types and processes of agricultural construction works, and to quantitatively assess the accident risk of them based on accident analysis. Regarding classification of construction works, actual 827 accident cases were thoroughly reviewed and coded by their construction site, facility and work type, project scale and so on. Most accidents (71.8 % of total cases) occurred in small-scale construction workplaces with less than 5 billion Korean won project budget. And those accidents related to agricultural infrastructure project (37.4%) and agricultural water development project (22.4%). In terms of work types, accidents frequently took place in form-work followed by pipe installation work, steel bar work and concrete work. The potential risks were compared with actual outbreak of accidents based on Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The results show that the potential conditions of accident expected to be took place is somewhat different from the actual conditions where accidents actually happened. This implicates that risk management manuals or education needs to be adjusted by reflecting unexpected circumstances. Overall, this study is meaningful in that the results could be foundations as to strengthen risk management capacity for agricultural engineering projects.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Chang, S. R., S. S. Go, and J. B. Lee, 2007. A Study on the risk index model of work type in architectural construction work. Journal of the Korean Society of Safety 22(6): 63-68 (in Korean).
  2. Go, S. S., H. Song, and J. Y. Lee, 2004. A Study on the hazard of work types for building construction. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction 20(5): 136-143 (in Korean).
  3. KICT, 2000. Development of the probabilistic risk assessment techniques for construction projects (in Korean).
  4. Kim, D. C., and W. J. Kim, 2001. A Study on the risk assessment method by accidents analysis in Steel- Structure work. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Structure & Construction 17(12): 217-224 (in Korean).
  5. Kim, J. M., J. B. Lee, and S. R. Chang, 2016. A Study on the accident analysis of architectural work. Journal of the Korean Society of Safety 31(3): 96-101 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2016.31.3.96
  6. Kim, T., 2000. A Study on introduction of risk assessment methods. Journal of Korean institute of fire science & engineering 1(3): 2-5 (in Korean).
  7. KOSHA, 2011. Risk Assessment Model for Civil Engineering Project by Work Types (in Korean).
  8. KOSHA, 2012. Study on the disaster reduction strategies for small construction sites. OSH Research Brief 6(5): 26-40 (in Korean).
  9. KOSHA, 2015. Report of Industrial Accident Investigation in 2014 (in Korean).
  10. KOSHA, 2017. Report of Industrial Disaster in 2016 (in Korean).
  11. KRC (Korea Rural Community Corporation), 2011. Construction Management Handbook of Agricultural Infrastructure Project (in Korean).
  12. KRC (Korea Rural Community Corporation), 2016. Design Standard of Agricultural Infrastructure Project (in Korean).
  13. KRC (Korea Rural Community Corporation), 2017. Order Status of Korea Rural Community Corporation (in Korean).
  14. Lee, J. B., 2007. A Study on the risk index of work type in architectural construction work using AHP and accident cases. Ph.D. thesis, Pukyong National University (in Korean).
  15. Lee, J. B., I. K. Han, and S. R. Chang, 2016. A Study on the risk level of work types in urban railway construction. Journal of the Korean Society of Safety 31(2): 98-103 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2016.31.2.98
  16. Lee, J. B., J. K. Lee, and S. R. Chang, 2013. A Study on the risk level of work types in nuclear power construction. Journal of the Korean Society of Safety 28(3): 95-99 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2013.28.3.095
  17. Lee, M. G., M. J. Jeong, K. D. Kim, S. K. Park, and S. J. Choi, 2008. The Assessment of the risk index in the bridge construction by the accident analysis. Journal of the Korean Society of Safety 23(6): 144-149 (in Korean).
  18. Ministry of Labor, 2017. Occupational Safety and Health Act (in Korean).
  19. Paik, S. W., H. J. Kim, and D. H. Choi, 2012. A Study of decreasing critical disaterous accidents in small construction sites. Journal of the Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers 54(6): 121-131 (in Korean). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5389/KSAE.2012.54.6.121.
  20. Seo, S. E., 2010. A Study on accident prevention using risk index in the bridge construction. Ph.D. thesis, Myongji University (in Korean).
  21. Shin, I. J., 2013. Comparative study on the institutional framework of risk assessment between German, UK and Korea, Japan in Asian Countries. Journal of the Korean Society of Safety 28(1): 151-157 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2013.28.1.151