DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A simple calculation for the preoperative estimation of transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous free flap volume in 2-stage breast reconstruction using a tissue expander

  • Kono, Hikaru (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine) ;
  • Ishii, Naohiro (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine) ;
  • Takayama, Masayoshi (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Nasu Red Cross Hospital) ;
  • Takemaru, Masashi (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kishi, Kazuo (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2017.09.14
  • Accepted : 2018.01.25
  • Published : 2018.07.15

Abstract

Background Flap volume is an important factor for obtaining satisfactory symmetry in breast reconstruction with a transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) free flap. We aimed to develop an easy and simple method to estimate flap volume. Methods We performed a preoperative estimation of the TRAM flap volume in five patients with breast cancer who underwent 2-stage breast reconstruction following an immediate tissue expander operation after a simple mastectomy. We measured the height and width of each flap zone using a ruler and measured the tissue thickness by ultrasound. The volume of each zone, approximated as a triangular or square prism, was then calculated. The zone volumes were summed to obtain the total calculated volume of the TRAM flap. We then determined the width of zone II, so that the calculated flap volume was equal to the required flap volume ($1.2{\times}1.05{\times}$the weight of the resected mastectomy tissue). The TRAM flap was transferred vertically so that zone III was located on the upper side, and zone II was trimmed in the sitting position after vascular anastomosis. We compared the estimated flap width of zone II (=X) with the actual flap width of zone II. Results X was similar to the actual measured width. Accurate volume replacement with the TRAM flap resulted in good symmetry in all cases. Conclusions The volume of a free TRAM flap can be straightforwardly estimated preoperatively using the method presented here, with ultrasound, ruler, and simple calculations, and this technique may help reduced the time required for precise flap tailoring.

Keywords

References

  1. Holmstrom H. The free abdominoplasty flap and its use in breast reconstruction: an experimental study and clinical case report. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1979;13:423-7. https://doi.org/10.3109/02844317909013092
  2. Wang XL, Liu LB, Song FM, et al. Meta-analysis of the safety and factors contributing to complications of MS-TRAM, DIEP, and SIEA flaps for breast reconstruction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2014;38:681-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-014-0333-3
  3. Selber JC, Samra F, Bristol M, et al. A head-to-head compar- ison between the muscle-sparing free TRAM and the SIEA flaps: is the rate of flap loss worth the gain in abdominal wall function? Plast Reconstr Surg 2008;122:348-55. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31817d60b0
  4. Rosson GD, Shridharani SM, Magarakis M, et al. Three-dimensional computed tomographic angiography to predict weight and volume of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Microsurgery 2011;31:510- 6. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.20910
  5. Kim H, Lim SY, Pyon JK, et al. Preoperative computed tomographic angiography of both donor and recipient sites for microsurgical breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;130:11e-20e. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182547d2a
  6. Eder M, Raith S, Jalali J, et al. Three-dimensional prediction of free-flap volume in autologous breast reconstruction by CT angiography imaging. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2014;9:541-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-013-0941-4
  7. Woo KJ, Mun GH. Estimation of DIEP flap weight for breast reconstruction by the pinch test. Microsurgery 2017;37:786- 92. https://doi.org/10.1002/micr.30217
  8. Yano K, Hosokawa K, Nakai K, et al. Regional differences in ultrasonic assessment of subcutaneous fat thickness in the abdomen: effects on the TRAM flap. Ann Plast Surg 2003; 51:130-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.SAP.0000058503.46432.96
  9. Minn KW, Hong KY, Lee SW. Preoperative TRAM free flap volume estimation for breast reconstruction in lean patients. Ann Plast Surg 2010;64:397-401. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181b143ef
  10. Campaigne BN, Katch VL, Freedson P, et al. Measurement of breast volume in females: description of a reliable method. Ann Hum Biol 1979;6:363-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/03014467900003741
  11. Edsander-Nord A, Wickman M, Jurell G. Measurement of breast volume with thermoplastic casts. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1996;30:129-32. https://doi.org/10.3109/02844319609056394
  12. Woo KJ, Kim EJ, Lee KT, et al. A novel method to estimate the weight of the DIEP flap in breast reconstruction: DIEPW, a simple calculation formula using paraumbilical flap thickness. J Reconstr Microsurg 2016;32:520-7. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1581078
  13. Ishii N, Ando J, Harao M, et al. Decreased contralateral breast volume after mastectomy, adjuvant chemotherapy, and antiestrogen therapy, in particular in breasts with high density. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2017;70:1363-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2017.05.013