디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제16권7호
  • /
  • Pages.131-144
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

정보비대칭 수준에 따른 정보공유의 윤리적 딜레마와 비윤리적 행동에 관한 연구

An Ethical Dilemma and Unethical Behavior of Information Sharing by Information Asymmetry Level

  • 정병호 (경남대학교 글로벌PM인력양성 사업단)
  • Jung, Byoungho (Global Project Management Training Center, Kyungnam University)
  • 투고 : 2018.04.30
  • 심사 : 2018.07.20
  • 발행 : 2018.07.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 조직 구성원들의 정보비대칭 수준에 따른 비윤리 정보공유를 실증적으로 검정하는 것이다. 정보비대칭 상황에 따라 조직 구성원들의 정보공유 딜레마, 비윤리적 공유의도와 행동의 차이가 있는지를 확인하고자 한다. 연구방법은 구조방정식을 사용하였다. 분석결과, 정보공유의 윤리적 딜레마, 비윤리적 의도, 비윤리적 행동은 서로 인과적 영향력이 있다고 나타났다. 특히, 직급별로는 윤리적 딜레마와 비윤리적 의도 간에 윤리적 딜레마의 세부 요인들이 다르다고 나타났다. 이에 연구 결과로서, 조직은 직급 수준에 따라서 윤리적 이슈를 다르게 관리해야 한다. 본 연구의 기여도는 사회과학 관점에서 깨진 유리창 이론의 해석 범위를 넓혔으며, 실무적 관점에서 직급별로 윤리적 딜레마 관리가 다르게 요구된다고 설명하였다. 향후 연구는 정보보안 시스템에 의해서 비윤리적 행동이 감소하는지 조사할 필요가 있다.

The purpose of this study is to empirically examine the unethical information sharing by information asymmetry. I will confirm the effect of ethical dilemma, unethical intention and behavior by the information asymmetry. A research method used the structural equations. The analysis showed causal relationship that ethical dilemma and unethical intention and behaviors by the information sharing. In particular, The ethical dilemma by position level showed different from the factor between dilemma and intention. As a result, the organization should manage differently ethical issue according to position level. The contribution in this study has expended an interpretation scope of broken windows theory from social science and explained a discriminative management of the ethical dilemma by position level from the practical view. A Future study should investigate an unethical behavior reduce by information security systems.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. O. C. Ferrell & J. Fraedrich. (2015). Business ethics: Ethical decision making & cases. Nelson Education.
  2. A. Kinicki & R. Kreitner. (2011). Organizational behavior. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
  3. Y. H. Kim & H. K. Kim. (2016). The moderating roles of employees' self-efficacy and trust in leader on the relationship between ethical leadership and employees' behaviors. Journal of Digital Convergence, 14(3), 71-81. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2016.14.3.71
  4. D. J. Shin & Y. Y. You. (2014). Research on the Effects of a Project Manager's Competency on a Consultant's Ethical Attitude and the Consulting Achievement with the Regulation Effects of CEO Support. Journal of Digital Convergence, 12(5), 191-201. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2014.12.5.191
  5. M. Kaptein & M. S. Schwartz. (2008). The effectiveness of business codes: A critical examination of existing studies and the development of an integrated research model. Journal of Business Ethics, 77(2), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9305-0
  6. J. H. Lee, B. H. Jung & B. C. Kim. (2013). Incident Response Competence by The Security Types of Firm s : Socio-Technical System Perspective. Korea Society of IT Services, 12(1), 289-308.
  7. E. Keri, S. Pearlson & C. Saunders. (2006). Managing and using information systems: A strategic approach. New York, NY: Wiley.
  8. H. C. Kelman & V. L. Hamilton. (1989). Crimes of obedience: Toward a social psychology of authority and responsibility. Yale University Press.
  9. K. C. Laudon & J. P. Laudon. (2016). Management information system. Pearson Education India.
  10. M. S. Schwartz & A. B. Carroll. (2003) Corporate social responsibility: A three-domain approach. Business ethics quarterly. 13(4), 503-530. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq200313435
  11. M. Shadnam & T. B. Lawrence. (2011). Understanding widespread misconduct in organizations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21(3), 379-407. https://doi.org/10.5840/beq201121324
  12. J. Q. Wilson & G. L. Kelling. (1982). Broken windows. Atlantic monthly, 249(3), 29-38.
  13. T. Donaldson & T. W. Dunfee. (1994). Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. Academy of management review, 19(2), 252-284. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1994.9410210749
  14. R. S. Burt. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford university press.
  15. S. E. Seibert, M. L. Kraimer & R. C. Liden. (2001). A social capital theory of career success. Academy of management journal, 44(2), 219-237. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069452
  16. S. P. Robbins & T. Judge. (2012). Essentials of organizational behavior. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
  17. B. H. Jung & B. C. Kim. (2017). Behavior Improvement of Unethical Information-Sharing by The Ethical Program : Social Capital and Ripple Effect. Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(8), 169-182. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.8.169
  18. D. J. Kim, D. L. Ferrin & H. R. Rao. (2008). A Trust-based Consumer Decision-making Model in Electronic Commerce: The Role of Trust, Perceived Risk, and Their Antecedents. Decision Support Systems, 44(2), 544-564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2007.07.001
  19. C. Yoon. (2011). Theory of Planned Behavior and Ethics Theory in Digital Piracy: An Integrated Model. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(3), 405-417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0687-7
  20. O. E. Williamson. (1980). The organization of work a comparative institutional assessment. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1(1), 5-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(80)90050-5
  21. S. P. Robbins, D. A. DeCenzo & M. Coulter. (2008). Fundamentals of management: essential concepts and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  22. J. R. Rest. (1986). Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory. New York.
  23. M. J. O'Fallon & K. D. Butterfield. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996-2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59(4), 375-413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-2929-7
  24. T. M. Jones. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model, Academy of management review, 16(2), 366-395. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4278958
  25. G. Clarkson, T. E. Jacobsen & A. L. Batcheller. (2007). Information asymmetry and information sharing. Government Information Quarterly, 24(4), 827-839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2007.08.001
  26. P. R. Nayyar. (1993). Performance effects of information asymmetry and economies of scope in diversified service firms. Academy of Management Journal, 36(1), 28-57. https://doi.org/10.2307/256511
  27. S. Kulkarni. (2000). Environmental ethics and information asymmetry among organizational stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 27(4), 215-228. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006340624326
  28. S. D. Williamson. (1986). Costly monitoring, financial intermediation, and equilibrium credit rationing. Journal of Monetary Economics, 18(2), 159-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(86)90074-7
  29. O. C. Ferrell & L. G. Gresham. (1985). A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 49, 87-96. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251618
  30. K. E. Pearlson & C. Saunders. (2009). Managing and using information systems. New York, NY: Wiley.
  31. C. Hill. (1990). Cooperation, Opportunism, and the Invisible Hand: Implications for Transaction Cost Theory. Academy of Management Review, 15(3), 500-513. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1990.4309111
  32. M. Weber. (1947). Legitimate authority and bureaucracy. The theory of social and economic organisation, 328-340.
  33. S. W. Kelley, S. J. Skinner & O. C. Ferrell. (1989). Opportunistic behavior in marketing research organizations. Journal of Business Research, 18(4), 327-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(89)90025-8
  34. O. C. Ferrell & S. J. Skinner. (1988). Ethical behavior and bureaucratic structure in marketing research organizations. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(1), 103-109. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172930
  35. J. J. Kish-Gephart, D. A. Harrison & L. K. Trevino. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of applied psychology, 95(1), 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017103
  36. R. J. Bennett & S. L. Robinson. (2003). The past, present, and future of workplace deviance research. Organizational behavior: the state of the science, 2nd edition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  37. J. F. Hair, W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, R. E. Anderson & R. L. Tatham. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice hall, 1998.
  38. W. W. Chin. (1998). The Partial Least Squares Approach for Structural Equation Modeling. Modern Methods of Business Research, 295(2), 295-336.