DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Utilization of Saline Solutions in the Modification of Lignocellulose from Champaca Wood

  • Sangian, Hanny F. (Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Sam Ratulangi University) ;
  • Sehe, Muhammad Rifai (Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Sam Ratulangi University) ;
  • Tamuntuan, Gerald H. (Department of Physics, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Sam Ratulangi University) ;
  • Zulnazri, Zulnazri (Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Malikussaleh University)
  • Received : 2018.05.17
  • Accepted : 2018.07.06
  • Published : 2018.07.25

Abstract

Objective of this work is to study the effects of a saline solution used to pretreat lignocellulosic material derived from champak timber. The native lignocellulosic solids, in powder form, were mixed with saline water solutions of three different concentrations and maintained for 2 weeks without stirring. The treated solids were washed, recovered, and then dried under sunlight. The substrates were characterized using X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The crystallinity (CrI), lateral order index (LOI), total crystallinity index (TCI), and surface morphologies of all the samples were determined. The treated biomass structures were compared with controls. The data show that the structures of all the treated substrates changed, as indicated by CrI. CrI of the treated substrates decreased significantly compared with that of the original wood, as did LOI and TCI quantities, whereas the HBI parameter increased. The results indicate that the saline water pretreatment modified the wood samples.

Keywords

References

  1. Andrade, L.P., Crespim, E., Oliveira, N., Campos, R.C., Teodoro, J.C., Galvao, C.M.A, Filho, R.M. 2017. Influence of sugarcane bagasse variability on sugar recovery for cellulosic ethanol production. Bioresource Technology 241: 75-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.05.081
  2. Badiei, M., Asim, N., Jahim, J.M., Sopian, K. 2014. Comparison of chemical pretreatment methods for cellulosic biomass. APCBEE Procedia 9: 170-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcbee.2014.01.030
  3. Baral, N.R., Shah, A. 2016. Techno‐economic analysis of cellulose dissolving ionic liquid pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for fermentable sugars production. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 10: 70-88. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1622
  4. Chandra, J.C.S., George, N., Narayanankutty, S.K. 2016. Isolation and characterization of cellulose nanofibrils from arecanut husk fibre. Carbohydrate Polymers 142: 158-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.01.015
  5. Chen, H., Liu, J., Chang, X., Chen, D., Xue, Y., Liu, P., Lin, H., Han, S. 2017. A review on the pretreatment of lignocellulose for high-value chemicals. Fuel Processing Technology 160: 196-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2016.12.007
  6. Feng, L., Chen, Z. 2008. Research progress on dissolution and functional modification of cellulose in ionic liquids. Journal of Molecular Liquids 142: 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2008.06.007
  7. French, A.D., Cintron, M.S. 2012. Cellulose polymorphy, crystallite size, and the segal crystallinity index. Cellulose 20: 583-588.
  8. Iswanto, A.H., Febrianto, F., Hadi, Y.S., Ruhendi, S., Hermawan, D., Fatriasari, W. 2018. Effect of particle pre-treatment on properties of jatropha fruit hulls particleboard. Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology 46: 155-165.
  9. Jay, A.G., Verma, P. 2016. Sustainable bio-ethanol production from agro-residues: a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 41: 550-567.
  10. Jung, J.Y., Yang, J.K. 2016. Enhancing enzymatic digestibility of miscanthus sinensis using steam explosion coupled with chemicals. Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology 44: 218-230. https://doi.org/10.5658/WOOD.2016.44.2.218
  11. Karimi, K., Taherzadeh, M.J. 2016. A critical review of analytical methods in pretreatment of lignocelluloses: composition, imaging, and crystallinity. Bioresource Technology 200: 1008-1018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.11.022
  12. Kim, M.S., Min, H.G., Lee, S.H., Kim, J.G. 2016. The effects of various amendments on trace element stabilization in acidic, neutral, and alkali soil with similar pollution index. PLoS ONE 11: 1-12.
  13. Kruer-Zerhusen, N., Cantero-Tubilla, B., Wilson, D.B. 2018. Characterization of cellulose crystallinity after enzymatic treatment using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). Cellulose 25: 37-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1542-0
  14. Kumar, M., Oyedun, A.O., Kumar, A. 2018. A review on the current status of various hydrothermal technologies on biomass feedstock. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 81, Part 2: 1742-1770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.270
  15. Kumar, T.S.M., Rajini, N., Reddy, K.O., Rajulu, A.V., Siengchin, S., Ayrilmis, N. 2018. All-cellulose composite films with cellulose matrix and napier grass cellulose fibril fillers. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 112: 1310-1315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.01.167
  16. Ma, X.J., Cao, S.L., Lin, L., Luo, X.L., Hu, H.C., Chen, L.H., Huang, L.L. 2013. Hydrothermal pretreatment of bamboo and cellulose degradation. Bioresource Technology 148: 408-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.09.021
  17. Nelson, M.L., O'Connor, R.T. 1964. Relation of certain infrared bands to cellulose crystallinity and crystal latticed type. part i: spectra of lattice types I, II, III and of amorphous cellulose. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 8: 1311-1324. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.1964.070080322
  18. Park, S., John, B., Michael, E.H., Philip, A.P., David, K.J. 2010. Cellulose crystallinity index: measurement techniques and their impact on interpreting cellulase performance. Biotechnology for Biofuels 3: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1754-6834-3-1
  19. Poletto, M., Ornaghi Jr, H.L., Zattera, A.J. 2014. Native cellulose: structure, characterization, and thermal properties. Materials 7: 6105-6119. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma7096105
  20. Rabemanolontsoa, H., Saka, S. 2016. Various pretreatments of lignocellulosics. Bioresource Technology 199: 83-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.08.029
  21. Roman, M., Winter, W.T. 2004. Effect of sulfate groups from sulfuric acid hydrolysis on the thermal degradation behavior of bacterial cellulose. Biomacromolecules 5: 1671-1677. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm034519+
  22. Sangian H. F., Widjaja A., 2017. Effect of pretreatment method on structural changes of coconut coir dust, BioResources 12: 8030-8046.
  23. Sangian, H.F., Kristian, J., Rahma, S., Agnesty, S.Y., Gunawan, S., Widjaja, A. 2015. Comparative study of the preparation of reducing sugars hydrolyzed from high-lignin lignocellulose pretreated with ionic liquid, alkaline solution and their combination. Journal of Engineering and Technology Sciences 47: 137-148. https://doi.org/10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2015.47.2.3
  24. Shishir, P.S., Chundawat, Bellesia, G., Uppugundla, N., da Costa Sousa, L., Gao, D., Cheh, A.M., Agarwal, U.P., Bianchetti, C.M., Phillips Jr., G.N., Langan, P., Balan, V., Gnanakaran, S., Dale, B.E. 2011. Restructuring the crystalline cellulose hydrogen bond network enhances its depolymerization rate. Journal of the American Chemical Society 133: 11163-11174. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja2011115
  25. Syaftika, N., Matsumura, Y. 2018. Comparative study of hydrothermal pretreatment for rice straw and its corresponding mixture of cellulose, xylan, and lignin. Bioresource Technology 255: 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.085
  26. Widyorini, R., Dewi, G.K., Nugroho, W.D., Prayitno, T.A., Jati, A.S., Tejolaksono, M.N. 2018. Properties of citric acid-bonded composite board from elephant dung fibers. Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology 46: 132-142.
  27. Widjaja, A., Agnesty, S.Y., Sangian, H.F., Gunawan, S. 2015. Application of ionic liquid [Dmim]Dmp pretreatment in the hydrolysis of sugarcane bagasse for biofuel production. Bulletin of Chemical Reaction Engineering & Catalysis 10: 70-77.
  28. Yu, H., Wu, Z., Chen, G. 2018. Catalytic gasification characteristics of cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin. Renewable Energy 121: 559-567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.01.047
  29. Yue, D., Qian, X. 2018. Isolation and rheological characterization of cellulose nanofibrils (cnfs) from coir fibers in comparison to wood and cotton. Polymers 10: 320: 1-12.