DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Two Small Intravenous Catheters for High-Rate Contrast Medium Injection for Computed Tomography in Patients Lacking Superficial Veins to Accommodate a Large Catheter

  • Son, Bum Gu (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Kim, Min Jung (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Park, Myeung Hwa (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Kim, Kyoungsook (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Kim, Jiyu (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Kim, Se-Young (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Lee, Kyung Jin (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Choi, Sang Hyun (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Kim, Ah Young (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Park, Seong Ho (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center)
  • Received : 2017.08.30
  • Accepted : 2017.10.30
  • Published : 2018.06.01

Abstract

Objective: To prospectively investigate the feasibility of using 2 small intravenous catheters for high-rate computed tomography (CT) contrast injection in patients lacking superficial veins capable of accommodating ${\leq}20-gauge$ catheters. Materials and Methods: Sixty-eight consecutive eligible adults referred for dynamic liver CT were enrolled; 58 had previously undergone liver CT, including 8 that experienced extravasation. Two 22- or 24-gauge catheters were placed in all patients after 2-5 venipunctures, and 2 mL/kg of contrast agent (370 mg I/mL) was split-administered through both catheters to achieve total flow rate of 4 mL/s. Patients' experience and examination success rate, defined as uneventful scans completed at 4 mL/s or at < 4 mL/s achieving standard image quality in all phases, were analyzed. Quantitative hepatic signal-to-noise and hepatic vascular contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were compared with 30 control examinations scanned at 4 mL/s using an 18-gauge catheter. Results: One case each of extravasation and severe injection pain caused the examination to be aborted. Success rate was 88.2% (60/68; 54 patients scanned at 4 mL/s, 6 at 3.5-3.9 mL/s). Fifty-five of 58 patients (94.8%) that had past CT regarded the venipuncture as more tolerable than (n = 36) or similar to (n = 19) past experiences; 45 of 58 patients (77.6%) found contrast injection less painful than (n = 35) or similar to (n = 10) past experiences. When compared with control examinations, signal-to-noise ratio was similar in all phases ($p{\geq}0.502$), but the hepatic arterial CNR in arterial phase was slightly inferior ($p{\leq}0.047$). Conclusion: Using 2 small intravenous catheters can effectively achieve high-rate CT contrast injection in patients lacking adequate superficial veins.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Dongkook Life Science. Co., Ltd.

References

  1. Fishman EK. CTisus: everything you need to know about computed tomography (CT) & CT scanning. Web site. http://www.ctisus.com. Accessed August 30, 2017
  2. Springer Healthcare. MDCT.net. Web site. https://mdct.net. Accessed August 30, 2017
  3. Johnson PT, Christensen GM, Fishman EK. I.v. contrast administration with dual source 128-MDCT: a randomized controlled study comparing 18-gauge nonfenestrated and 20-gauge fenestrated catheters for catheter placement success, infusion rate, image quality, and complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;202:1166-1170 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.11730
  4. Schima W, Hammerstingl R, Catalano C, Marti-Bonmati L, Rummeny EJ, Montero FT, et al. Quadruple-phase MDCT of the liver in patients with suspected hepatocellular carcinoma: effect of contrast material flow rate. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;186:1571-1579 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.05.1226
  5. Cho JS, Kwag JG, Oh YR, Han SD, Song CJ. Detection and characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma: value of dynamic CT during the arterial dominant phase with uniphasic contrast medium injection. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996;20:128-134 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-199601000-00024
  6. Behrendt FF, Bruners P, Keil S, Plumhans C, Mahnken AH, Stanzel S, et al. Impact of different vein catheter sizes for mechanical power injection in CT: in vitro evaluation with use of a circulation phantom. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2009;32:25-31 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-008-9359-8
  7. Wienbeck S, Fischbach R, Kloska SP, Seidensticker P, Osada N, Heindel W, et al. Prospective study of access site complications of automated contrast injection with peripheral venous access in MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195:825-829 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.3739
  8. Nicola R, Shaqdan KW, Aran S, Prabhakar AM, Singh AK, Abujudeh HH. Contrast media extravasation of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging: management guidelines for the radiologist. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2016;45:161-164 https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2015.08.004
  9. Pacheco Compana FJ, Gago Vidal B, Mendez Diaz C. [Extravasation of contrast media at the puncture site: strategies for managment]. Radiologia 2014;56:295-302 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rx.2014.02.003
  10. Sbitany H, Koltz PF, Mays C, Girotto JA, Langstein HN. CT contrast extravasation in the upper extremity: strategies for management. Int J Surg 2010;8:384-386 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.06.002
  11. Sandler KL, Markham LW, Mah ML, Byrum EP, Williams JR. Optimizing CT angiography in patients with Fontan physiology: single-center experience of dual-site power injection. Clin Radiol 2014;69:e562-e567 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2014.09.011
  12. Prabhu SP, Mahmood S, Sena L, Lee EY. MDCT evaluation of pulmonary embolism in children and young adults following a lateral tunnel Fontan procedure: optimizing contrastenhancement techniques. Pediatr Radiol 2009;39:938-944 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-009-1304-8
  13. Shuman WP, Chan KT, Busey JM, Mitsumori LM, Choi E, Koprowicz KM, et al. Standard and reduced radiation dose liver CT images: adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus model-based iterative reconstruction-comparison of findings and image quality. Radiology 2014;273:793-800 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.14140676
  14. Park SH, Kim PN, Kim KW, Lee SW, Yoon SE, Park SW, et al. Macrovesicular hepatic steatosis in living liver donors: use of CT for quantitative and qualitative assessment. Radiology 2006;239:105-112 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2391050361
  15. Shuman WP, O'Malley RB, Busey JM, Ramos MM, Koprowicz KM. Prospective comparison of dual-energy CT aortography using 70% reduced iodine dose versus single-energy CT aortography using standard iodine dose in the same patient. Abdom Radiol 2017;42:759-765 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-1041-z
  16. Lv P, Liu J, Chai Y, Yan X, Gao J, Dong J. Automatic spectral imaging protocol selection and iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT with reduced contrast agent dose: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2017;27:374-383 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4349-8
  17. Ma CL, Chen XX, Lei YX, Zhang XR, Jia YJ, Tian X, et al. Clinical value of dual-energy spectral imaging with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction for reducing contrast medium dose in CT portal venography: in comparison with standard 120-kVp imaging protocol. Br J Radiol 2016;89:20151022 https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20151022
  18. Lee JW, Lee G, Lee NK, Moon JI, Ju YH, Suh YJ, et al. Effectiveness of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction for 64-slice dual-energy computed tomography pulmonary angiography in patients with a reduced iodine load: comparison with standard computed tomography pulmonary angiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2016;40:777-783 https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000000443
  19. Iyama Y, Nakaura T, Yokoyama K, Kidoh M, Harada K, Tokuyasu S, et al. Impact of knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction in abdominal dynamic CT with low tube voltage and low contrast dose. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016;206:687-693 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.15.14518
  20. Chung YE, You JS, Lee HJ, Lim JS, Lee HS, Baek SE, et al. Possible contrast media reduction with low keV monoenergetic images in the detection of focal liver lesions: a dual-energy CT animal study. PLoS One 2015;10:e0133170 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133170
  21. Noda Y, Kanematsu M, Goshima S, Kondo H, Watanabe H, Kawada H, et al. Reduction of iodine load in CT imaging of pancreas acquired with low tube voltage and an adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2014;38:714-720 https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000000106
  22. Chen CM, Chu SY, Hsu MY, Liao YL, Tsai HY. Low-tube-voltage (80 kVp) CT aortography using 320-row volume CT with adaptive iterative reconstruction: lower contrast medium and radiation dose. Eur Radiol 2014;24:460-468 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-3027-3
  23. Nakaura T, Nakamura S, Maruyama N, Funama Y, Awai K, Harada K, et al. Low contrast agent and radiation dose protocol for hepatic dynamic CT of thin adults at 256-detector row CT: effect of low tube voltage and hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithm on image quality. Radiology 2012;264:445-454 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.12111082
  24. Goo HW, Goo JM. Dual-energy CT: new horizon in medical imaging. Korean J Radiol 2017;18:555-569 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2017.18.4.555

Cited by

  1. Alternative vascular device for high-flow computed tomography angiography: ultrasound-guided long peripheral catheter (4 Fr × 10 cm) vol.22, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1177/1129729820938191