DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

경관인식에 따른 산지경관 관리 가치 연구

Mountainous Landscape Management Value by Landscape Recognition

  • 민수희 (한국산지보전협회 산지연구센터) ;
  • 장효진 (서울대학교 지리학과) ;
  • 정윤희 (서울대학교 농업생명과학연구원) ;
  • 송정은 (한국산지보전협회 산지연구센터)
  • Min, Su-Hui (Forestland Policy Research Center, Korea Forest Conservation Association) ;
  • Jang, Hyo-Jin (Dept. of Geography, Seoul National University) ;
  • Jeung, Yoon-Hee (Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Song, Jung-Eun (Forestland Policy Research Center, Korea Forest Conservation Association)
  • 투고 : 2018.03.27
  • 심사 : 2018.05.29
  • 발행 : 2018.06.30

초록

본 연구는 국토의 골격을 형성하는 산지경관의 보전과 여가 휴양 및 복지 등의 다양한 산지수요에 대응하기 위한 합리적 경관관리 수단이 요구되는 시점에 실제 경관을 바라보고 인식하는 주체인 일반인을 대상으로 산지경관 인식을 조사하고, 산지경관 관리를 위한 지불용의성 평가(WTP)를 통해 경제적 가치를 추정함으로써 산지경관 관리를 위한 기초자료를 제공하고자 하였다. 국토경관과 산지경관 인식비교 결과, 산지경관은 경관미 3.96, 관리수준 만족도 3.28, 관리의 필요성 4.38로 국토경관보다 높게 나타난 반면, 국토경관의 경관미는 만족하나 관리 수준이 미흡하여 이에 대한 개선 필요성이 요구되었다. 경관이 아름다운 지역으로 수려한 산지경관자원이 풍부한 제주(39.0%), 강원(38.6%) 순으로 선정되었다. 이들은 산지경관의 광활한 스카이라인과 지역의 배경이자 랜드마크를 형성하는 산지경관의 심미적 특성을 높게 평가하였으며, 개발사업 전산지경관영향검토 수행 필요성에 대해 응답자의 86.8%가 찬성함으로써 산지경관 관리에 대한 의식이 높아진 것으로 판단되었다. 산지경관 관리를 위해 지불하고자 하는 1인당 지불의사금액은 3,742원으로 도출되었으며, 이는 2016년 산악형 국립공원 방문객 수를 기준으로 환산하면, 약 1,695억 원의 경제적 가치를 지니는 것으로 추정된다. 산지경관은 행정주체의 정책만으로 관리하기에 한계가 있다. 국민의 경관인식 현황을 진단함으로써 경관관리의 중요성과 필요성의 공감대를 형성하고, 이를 바탕으로 보다 실효적인 정책방향 수립과 산지경관 관리가 추진되길 기대한다.

Recently, the conservation of mountainous landscape and compensation for diverse demands for mountain areas such as leisure, recreation and welfare are under discussion. The purpose of this study is to investigation the perception of mountainous landscapes by those who view and recognize the landscapes and to estimate economic value by estimating the willingness to pay for the management of mountainous landscapes. This study will provide data for the management of mountainous landscapes. As a result of comparing the perception between the territorial landscape and the mountain landscape, the mountain scenery was 3.96, the management level satisfaction was 3.28, and the management necessity was 4.38, which was higher than the national landscape, while the national landscape was satisfactory but the management level was insufficient. Jeju Island (39.0%) and Gangwon (38.6%) were chosen as the most scenic areas with beautiful forest and mountainous landscape resources. The aesthetic characteristics of the vast skyline of mountain scenery, the background of the area, and the mountainous landscape that forms the landmark were evaluated highly. And, it is considered that consciousness of mountainous landscape management is heightened by 86.8% of respondents, who positively answered the Mountainous Landscape Visual Impact Assessment before the development project. The per capita payment amount for mountainous landscape management was calculated to be 3,742 won and, based on the number of visitors to the mountain National Parks in 2016, it is estimated to have an economic value of about 169.5 billion won. Policymakers have limitations in the mountainous landscape management policies of the administrative subject. Establishing a consensus on the importance and necessity of landscape management by diagnosing the status of public perception is expected to help create more effective policy direction and implement strategies for the management of these areas.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Architecture Urban Research Institute (2013) A Study on the Landscape Competitiveness Evaluation in Korean Cities. Architecture Urban Research Institute.
  2. Architecture Urban Research Institute (2015) A Study on Establishment of Landscape Policy Plan and Activation of Landscape Agreement. Architecture Urban Research Institute.
  3. Architecture Urban Research Institute (2016) A Study on Improving the Rural Landscape Management System from the Aspect of Land Management (2). Architecture Urban Research Institute.
  4. Bahk, H. C., S. C. Lee, S. H. Jeong, S. J. Lee, S. J. Kim and H. J. Park (2010) A study of the shift and the difference in perceptions on urban landscape of Seoul. Seoul Studies 11(4): 33-49.
  5. Chae, S. I. (2003) Social Scientific Survey Methodology. B &M Books.
  6. Han, S. H. (2014) Estimating the fluctuation of economic valuation through the change of Haeundae beach’s landscape: Comparing 2009 vs 2013. Journal of Northeast Asia Tourism Research 10(1): 117-139.
  7. Hanemann. W. M. (1984) Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66(3): 332-341. https://doi.org/10.2307/1240800
  8. Im, S. B. (1991) Theories in Landscape Analysis. Seoul National University Press.
  9. Im, S. B. (2007) Environmental Psychology and Human Behavior. Bomundang.
  10. Jang, J. I. and S. Y. Park (2017) The economic benefits of coastal scape management. Journal of Korean Society for Marine Environment and Energy 20(4): 209-218. https://doi.org/10.7846/JKOSMEE.2017.20.4.209
  11. Joo, S. H. and G. I. Kim (2012) A study on the changes of the landscape cognition in Yong-In City. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 40(5): 88-99. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2012.40.5.088
  12. Kim, B. G., S. K. Oh and J. M. Lim (2009) Landscape administration by the enforcement of the landscape law in Japan. Journal of The Urban Design Insitute of Korea 10(1): 5-20.
  13. Kim, J. J., C. W. Park and M. J. Kang (2010) Study on the local officials’ awareness for direction of forest landscape management. Journal of Korean Forest Society 99(4): 603-610.
  14. Korea Environment Institute (2007) Building the Environmental Valuation System. Korea Environment Institute.
  15. Korea Forest Service (2013-2015) Establishment of Forest-land Scenery Management System.
  16. Korea Forest Service (2017) Forest Welfare Promotion Plan.
  17. Min, S. H., Y. H. Jung, W. Y. Joo and H. J. Jang (2016) A study on the mountainous landscape impact review-system by the importanceperformance analysis. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 44(1): 29-39. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2016.44.1.029
  18. Ministry of Environment (2001) A Study on the Economic Value Measurement of Natural Resources. Ministry of Environment.
  19. Park, S. G., S. C. Lee, G. L. Kang and S. H. Choi (2016) A study about the presumed economic value of miscanthus landscape conservation miscanthus colonies in Youngnam province. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 44(4): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2016.44.4.001
  20. Sim, K. W., H. G. Kwon and S. H. Lee (2013) A study on economic value of national park based on contingent valuation methods: Case of 20 national parks. Journal of Korean Institute of Forest Recreation 17(4): 33-40.