DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Aging Workforce and Organizational Innovation: Curvilinearity and the Moderating Role of Age Diversity

고령화와 조직 혁신: 비선형성과 연령 다양성의 조절효과

  • Park, Jisung (College of Business and Economics, Chungnam National University)
  • Received : 2018.03.29
  • Accepted : 2018.06.01
  • Published : 2018.06.30

Abstract

This study examines the contrasting effects of an aging workforce on organizational innovation and the moderating role of age diversity. By utilizing a knowledge-based view, this study asserts that an aging workforce can contribute to organizational innovation to some degree due to accumulated firm-specific knowledge and experiences as well as various social networks within and outside the firm. On the contrary, as the portion of an aging workforce increases, the negative effect of the aging workforce on organizational innovation can overwhelm the positive effects because of the limitations of new knowledge creation. In addition, this study explores the effect of age diversity to moderate the relationship between aging workforce and organizational innovation.Empirical findings showed that an aging workforce and organizational innovation had an inverted-U relationship, and age diversity moderated this curvilinear relationship as this study predicted. These theoretical arguments and empirical findings highlight the necessity to explore the complex effects of an aging workforce on organizational innovation as well as additional factors influencing the relationship between aging workforce and firm innovation.

본 논문은 고령인력이 조직 혁신에 미치는 효과와 연령 다양성이 이러한 관계를 어떻게 조절하는지를 중심으로 살펴본다. 지식경영 기반 관점에 근거하여, 본 연구는 기업 특유적 지식과 조직 내외부 사회적 연결망 측면에서 고령인력이 일정 정도 조직 혁신에 기여할 수 있을 것으로 보았다. 반면, 고령인력 비중이 지속적으로 늘어나게 되면 새로운 지식 창출관점에서 한계를 가질 수 있으므로 조직 혁신에 미치는 긍정적 효과보다는 부정적 효과가 보다 강하게 나타날 것으로 예상하였다. 이에 더하여, 고령인력과 조직 혁신 간 비선형적 관계를 조절하는 요인으로 연령 다양성의 효과에 대해 살펴보았는데, 본 연구는 새로운 지식의 창출이라는 측면에서 연령 다양성이 고령인력과 조직 혁신 간 비선형 관계를 조절할 것으로 예측하였다. 실증 분석을 실시한 결과, 예측한대로 고령인력과 조직 혁신은 역 U자 관계를 가지고 있었으며, 연령 다양성은 이러한 역 U자 관계를 조절하는 역할을 하는 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 이론적 논의와 실증 결과는 고령인력이 조직 혁신에 미치는 다양한 효과들을 보다 다각적으로 검증하고 이러한 관계에 영향을 줄 수 있는 보다 다양한 요인들에 대한 탐색이 이루어져야 함을 보여준다.

Keywords

References

  1. E. Yeatts, W. E. Folts, J. D. Knapp, "Older Workers' Adaptation to a Changing Workplace: Employment Issues for the 21st Century", Educational Gerontology, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 331-347, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/036012799267774
  2. M. J. Ashworth, "Preserving Knowledge Legacies: Workforce Aging, Turnover and Human Resource Issues in the US Electric Power Industry", International Journal of Human Resource Management, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 1659-665, 1688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190600878600
  3. R. A. Posthuma, M. A. Campion, "Age Stereotypes in the Workplace: Common Stereotypes, Moderators, and Future Research Directions", Journal of Management, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 158-188, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308318617
  4. I. Nonaka, H. Takeuchi "The Knowledge-Creating Company", Harvard Business Review, vol. 85, no. 7/8, pp. 162-171, 2007.
  5. I. Nonaka, "A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation", Organization Science, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 14-37, 1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.5.1.14
  6. T. W. Ng, D. C. Feldman, "Evaluating Six Common Stereotypes about Older Workers with Meta-Analytical Data", Personnel Psychology, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 821-858, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12003
  7. K. H. Frosch "Workforce Age and Innovation: A Literature Survey", International Journal of Management Review, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 414-430, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00298.x
  8. C. Binnewies, S. Ohly, C. Niessen, "Age and Creativity at Work: The Interplay between Job Resources, Age and Idea Creativity", Journal of Managerial Psychology, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 438-457, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940810869042
  9. B. Verworn, C. Hipp, "Does the Ageing Workforce Hamper the Innovativeness of Firms? (No) Evidence from Germany", International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 180-197, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJHRDM.2009.023452
  10. U. Backes-Gellner, M. R. Schneider, S. Veen, "Effect of Workforce Age on Quantitative and Qualitative Organizational Performance: Conceptual Framework and Case Study Evidence", Organization Studies, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1103-1121, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840611416746
  11. R. M. Kanter, "Why a Thousand Flowers Bloom: Structural, Collective, and Social Conditions for Innovation in Organization", In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 10, pp. 169-211, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1988.
  12. T. M. Amabile, "How to Kill Creativity", Harvard Business Review, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 634-665, 1998.
  13. R. Kanfer, P. L. Ackerman, "Aging, Adult Development, and Work Motivation", Academy of Management Review, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 440-458, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/20159053
  14. M. E. Beier, P. L. Ackerman, "Age, Ability, and the Role of Prior Knowledge on the Acquisition of New Domain Knowledge: Promising Results in a Real-World Learning Environment", Psychology and Aging, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 341-355, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.20.2.341
  15. T. W. Ng, D. C. Feldman, "A Meta-Analysis of Relationships of Age and Tenure with Innovation-related Behaviour", Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 585-616, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12031
  16. K. Y. Williams, C. A. O'Reilly, "Demography and Diversity in Organizations: A Review of 40 Years of Research", In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 20, pp. 77-140, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  17. K. A. Jehn, G. B. Northcraft, M. A. Neale, "Why Differences Make a Difference: A Field Study of Diversity, Conflict, and Performance in Workgroups ", Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 741-763, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2667054
  18. F. J. Milken, L. L. Martins, "Searching for Common Threads: Understanding the Multiple Effects of Diversity in Organizational Groups", Academy of Management Review, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 402-433, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258667
  19. G. Ahuja, R. Katila, "Where do Resources Come From? The Role of Idiosyncratic Situations", Strategic Management Journal, vol. 25, no. 8-9, pp. 887-907, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.401
  20. A. Nerkar, "Old is Gold? The Value of Temporal Exploration in the Creation of New Knowledge", Management Science, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1183-1194, 2002.
  21. L. Rosenkopf, A. Nerkar, "Beyond Local Search: Boundary-spanning, Exploration, and Impact in the Optical Disk Industry", Strategic Management Journal, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 287-306, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.160
  22. B. Crepon, E. Duguet, "Estimating the Innovation Function from Patent Number: GMM on Count Panel Data", Journal of Applied Econometrics, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 243-263, 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(199705)12:3<243::AID-JAE444>3.0.CO;2-4
  23. P. M. Blau, Inequality and Heterogeneity. Free Press, Glen-COE, IL, 1977.
  24. J. Hilbe, Negative Binomial Estimation. Oxford University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811852