농업과학연구 (Korean Journal of Agricultural Science)

  • 제45권2호
  • /
  • Pages.169-176
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2466-2402(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2466-2410(eISSN)
충남대학교 농업과학연구소 (Institute of Agricultural Science, CNU)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Glycine soja and hairy vetch supplementation on the nutritional quality of corn silage

  • Jung, Kang Seok (College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Cho, Hyun Min (College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Hyung Suk (Woosong College) ;
  • Heo, Jung Min (College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Soo Kee (College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chungnam National University)
  • 투고 : 2018.01.26
  • 심사 : 2018.03.09
  • 발행 : 2018.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study evaluated the effects of Glycine soja (GS) and hairy vetch supplementation on the quality of corn silage. The feeding regimen consisted of a corn silage (Control) and a control supplemented either with 20% GS or 20% hairy vetch with four replicates. All experimental diets were stored for 40 days at room temperature ($20-25^{\circ}C$). The control had a higher (p < 0.05) dry matter level but had a lower level (p < 0.05) of crude protein, crude fat, acid detergent fiber and neutral detergent fiber than any other treatments. Hairy vetch had a higher level (p < 0.05) of acetic acid and butyric acid than any other groups but had a lower level (p < 0.05) of lactic acid than that of the control. A lower silage pH was observed (p < 0.05) in the control compared to the other treatments. The control had lower (p < 0.05) sucrose and fructose concentrations compared to the other treatments. Corn silage supplemented with hairy vetch showed a higher level (p < 0.05) of crude protein and buffer solution protein and a higher ratio of soluble protein to insoluble protein than any of the other groups. Thus, the results of the present study suggest that GS and hairy vetch supplementation of corn silage would be beneficial for maintaining quality and elevating protein levels when compared to the control.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ahmed S, Rao M. 1982. Performance of maize-soybean intercrop combination in the tropics: Results of a multilocation study. Field Crops Research 5:147-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(82)90015-6
  2. Albrecht KA, Beauchemin KA. 2003. Alfalfa and other perennial legume silage. Silage Science and Technology 2003:633-664.
  3. Anil L, Park J, Philips RH. 2000. The potential of forage-maize intercrops in ruminant nutrition. Animal Feed Science and Technology 86:157-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(00)00176-0
  4. AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists). 1995. Official method of analysis (16th ed.). Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington. DC, USA.
  5. Armstrong KL, Albrecht KA, Lauer JG, Riday H. 2008. Intercropping corn with lablab bean, velvet bean, and scarlet runner bean for forage. Crop Science 48:371-378. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2007.04.0244
  6. Carruthers K, Prithiviraj B, Fe Q, Cloutier D, Martin RC, Smith DL. 2000. Intercropping of corn with soybean, lupin and forages: Silage yield and quality. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 185:177-185. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-037x.2000.00421.x
  7. Contreras-Govea FE, Muck RE, Armstrong KL, Albrecht KA. 2009. Nutritive value of corn silage in mixture with climbing beans. Animal Feed Science and Technology 150:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2008.07.001
  8. Choi CW. 2016. Changes in ruminal fermentation and blood metabolism in steers fed low protein TMR with protein fraction-enriched feeds. Korea Journal of Agricultural science 43:379-386. https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20160040
  9. Darby HM, Lauer JG. 2002. Planting date and hybrid influence on corn forage yield and quality. Agronomy Journal 94:281-289. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2002.0281
  10. Duncan DB. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F tests. Biometrics 11:1-42. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478
  11. Goering HK, Van Soest PJ. 1970. Forage fiber analysis. Agric. Handbook. No. 379. ARS, USDA. Washington DC, USA.
  12. Jang WS, Yang BM, Heo JM, Lee HS, Lee SK. 2015. Effects of supplementation of hairy vetch on the quality of whole crop barley silage. CNU Journal of Agricultural Science 42:383-388. [in Korean]
  13. Kim CJ, Kim HK, Park KJ, Shin JN, Lee SK, Lee ID, Lee JS, Jeon BT, Jung YK, Jo ih, Han HJ. 1995. Grass science. pp. 390-391. Hyangmoonsa, Seoul, Korea. [in Korean]
  14. Kim JG, Li YW, Park HS, Kim JD. 2017. Comparative study on the productivity for silage corn (Zea mays L.) variety certified import adaptability in Pyeongchang area. Journal of the Korean Society of Grassland and Forage Science 37:161-167. https://doi.org/10.5333/KGFS.2017.37.2.161
  15. Kung L JR, Stokes MR, Lin CJ. 2003. Silage additives. In Buxton DR, Harrison JH, Muck RE. (Eds.). pp. 305-360. Silage science and Technology, ASA-CSSA, Madison, USA.
  16. Lessard JR, Erfle JD, Sauer FD, Mahadevan S. 1978. Protein and free amino acid patterns in maize ensiled with or without urea. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 29:506-512. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740290603
  17. Licitra G, Hernandez, Van soest PJ. 1996. Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fraction of ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology 57:347-358. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00837-3
  18. Martin RC, Voldeng HC, Smith DL. 1990. Intercropping corn and soybean in a cool temperate region: Yield, protein and economic benefits. Field Crops Research 23:295-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(90)90061-F
  19. McDonald P. 1981. The biochemistry of silage. pp. 148-152. A Wiley-Interscience Publication, Hoboken, NJ, USA.
  20. Muck RE, Moser LE, Pitt RE. 2003. Postharvest factors affecting ensiling. Agronomy 42:251-304.
  21. Mustafa AF, Seguin P. 2003. Characteristics and in situ degradability of whole crop faba bean, pea, and soybean silages. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 83:793-799. https://doi.org/10.4141/A03-065
  22. Ofori F, Stern WR. 1987. Cereal-legume intercropping systems. Advances in Agronomy 41:41-86.
  23. Putnam DH, Herbert SJ, Vargas A. 1986. Intercropped corn-soybean density studies. II. Yield composition and protein. Experimental Agriculture 22:373-381. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479700014629
  24. Sheaffer CC, Orf JH, Devine TE, Jewett JG. 2001. Yield and quality of forage soybean. Agronomy Journal 93:99-106. 10.2134/agronj2001.93199x
  25. SAS Institute. 2005. SAS Prosedure guide. VERSION 8.2. SAS Inst. Cary, NC, USA.
  26. Singh NB, Singh PP, Nair KPP. 1986. Effect of legume intercropping on enrichment of soil nitrogen, bacterial activity and productivity of associated maize crops. Experimental Agriculture 22:339-344. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479700014587
  27. Sniffen CJ, O'Connor JD, Van Soest PJ, Fox DG, Russel JB. 1992. A net carbohydrate protein system for evaluating cattle diet: II. Carbohydrate and protein availability. Journal of Animal Science 70:3562-3577. https://doi.org/10.2527/1992.70113562x
  28. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74:3583-3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2
  29. Weinberg ZG, Muck RE. 1996. New trends and opportunities in the development and use of inoculants for silage. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 19:53-68.
  30. Yang BM, Heo JM, Park KW, Lee HS, Lee SK. 2016. Effects of Glycine soja supplementation on the quality of corn silage. Weed & Turfgrass Science 5:1-6. [in Korean] https://doi.org/10.5660/WTS.2016.5.1.1