World Technopolis Review

World Technopolis Association (세계과학도시연합)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Future of Science Parks and Areas of Innovation: Science and Technology Parks Shaping the Future

  • Received : 2018.02.13
  • Accepted : 2018.04.30
  • Published : 2018.06.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The successful development of science parks is dependent on the relevance and delivery of a range of value propositions they offer to their stakeholders. Experience has shown that the benefits of these value propositions are 'place based' and 'time dependent', influenced by the prevailing technology, social and business environments in which they operate, and the relationship that is developed between entrepreneurs, corporates, academia and government in creating these projects, and their performance is dependent on economic, physical and networking assets they create and deploy. This paper looks at some of the history that has influenced the development of parks, lessons learnt from their planning, development and operation. It reviews these details in the context of delivering value propositions in the context of temporal, spatial, technology and entrepreneurial profile of the new idea of 'innovation districts', influencing 'city planning' and supporting 'smart specialisation strategies'.

Keywords

References

  1. Dobbs, R., Madgavkar, A., Barton, D., Labaye, E., Manyika, J., Roxburgh, C., Lund, S., and Madhav, S. (2012) The World at Work: Jobs, pay, and skills for 3.5 billion people, McKinsey Global Institute, McKinsey & Company. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/-/media/McKinsey/Global%20Themes/Employment%20and%20Growth/The%20world%20at%20work/MGI%20Global_labor_Full_Report_June_2012.ashx
  2. European Centre for Strategic Management of Universities (ESMU) (2010) University Engagement and Regional Innovation, Paul Benneworth Center for Higher Education Policy Studies University of Twente The Netherlands. Available at: https://www.eurashe.eu/library/modernising-phe/MODERN_University%20Engagement%20and%20Regional%20Innovation.pdf
  3. Foray, D., Goddard, J., Beldarrain, X. G., Landabaso, M., Mc-Cann, P., Nauwelaers, C., and Ortega-Argiles, R. (2012) RIS3 Guide to Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisation (RIS3), European Commission. Available at: http://s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/documents/20182/84453/RIS3+Guide.pdf/fceb8c58-73a9-4863-8107-752aef77e7b4
  4. Gibson, J., Robinson, M., and Cain, S. (June 2015) City initiatives for Technology, Innovation and Entrepreneurship: A Resource for City Leadership, Published jointly by Nesta, Accenture, and Catapult Future Cities. Available at: http://citie.org/assets/uploads/2015/04/CITIE_Report_2015.pdf
  5. Gill R., Personal Communication (2017) "SQW following their preparation of the SIA for Innovate South on behalf of the LEP Enterprise M3".
  6. Hargroves, K., and Smith, M. H. (2005) The Natural Advantage of Nations: Business Opportunities, Innovation and Governance in the 21st Century, Earthscan, London.
  7. Her Majesty's Treasury and the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (2006) Devolving Decision Making: 3 -Meeting the Regional Economic Challenge: The Importance of Cities to Regional Growth, London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. Available at: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/media/20C/18/bud06_cities_563.pdf
  8. Huggins, R., and Izushi, H. (2007) "The Knowledge Competitiveness of Regional Economics: Conceptualisation and Measurement", Bank of Valletta Review No.35 (Spring 2007). Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Robert_Huggins5/publication/40499471_The_knowledge_competitiveness_of_regional_economies_conceptualisation_and_measurement/links/00b7d53aaad02929b7000000.pdf
  9. Huggins, R. (2016) "Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Networks: Lessons for Regional Development Policy", Welsh Economic Review 24 (Spring 2016). Available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
  10. Katz, B., and Wagner, J. (2014) "The Rise of Innovation Districts: A New Geography of innovation in America", Metropolitan Policy Program at Brookings (May 2014), Brookings Institution. Available at: https://www.brookings.edu/essay/rise-of-innovation-districts
  11. Lobo, J., and Strumsky, D. (2008) "Metropolitan patenting, inventor agglomeration and social networks: A tale of two effects", Journal of Urban Economics 63: 871-884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2007.07.005
  12. Malechi, E. J. (2010) "Everywhere? The Geography of Knowledge", Journal of Regional Science 50(1): 493-513. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.2009.00640.x
  13. Nauwelaers, C., Kleibrink, A., and Stancova, K. (2014) The Role of Science Parks in Smart Specialisation Strategies (S3 Policy Brief Series, No. 08/2013), European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for prospective Technological Studies, Spain.
  14. Parry, M. (1992) "The Driving Force behind the concept, physical planning and development of science parks", Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Development Strategies of Science Town, Nov. 19-20, 1992, Korea Science and Engineering Foundation: Daejon.
  15. Parry, M. (1992) "Science Parks: the driving forces behind the concept and their physical planning", Paper presented at the International Symposium on the Development Strategies for Science Town, Organised by KOSEF Daejeon November 19th -20th 1992.
  16. Parry, M. (2014) "Tenant companies: The lessons for the planning, development and management of science and technology parks from an analysis of 29 years of data on tenant companies on the Surrey Research Park", Proceedings of the IASP Annual Conference 2014 (Oct. 19-22, 2014, Qatar), International Association of Science Parks and Areas of Innovation (IASP).
  17. Parry M. (2016) "Science and Technology Parks, Areas of Innovation, government, universities, civil society and business - where are they going in the innovation race and what should S&TPs be doing to help anchor innovation in a region?", Proceedings of IASP Annual Conference 2016 (20-23 Sep. 2016, Moscow), IASP.
  18. Research Commissioner Janez Potocnik's Expert Group (2009) Knowledge for Growth: Prospects for science, technology and innovation, European Commission. available at: http://ec.europa.eu/invest-in-research/pdf/download_en/selected_papers_en.pdf
  19. Reynolds, P. D., Camp, S. M., Bygrave, W. D., Autio, E., and Hay, M. (2001) Global Entrepreneurship Monitor: 2001 Executive Report, Business Council for the United Nations. Available at: http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un/unpan002481.pdf
  20. Robertson, J. (27 Oct. 2016) "How to Big Bang changed the City of London for ever", BBC News. Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-37751599
  21. Schumpeter, J. A. (1976) Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (2nd Edition), Routledge.
  22. SEEDA (2001) Global Index of Regional Knowledge Economies: Benchmarking South East England, The South East England Development Agency (SEEDA) and Robert Huggins Associates. Available at: http://www.secouncils.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/_publications/93-Huggins_report_november_2001.pdf
  23. Strumsky, D., and Thill, J-C. (2013) "Profiling US metropolitan regions by their social research networks and regional economic performance", Journal of Regional Science 53(5): 813-833. https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12048
  24. Technopolis (2016) SIAs: Guidance for Wave 2 Consortia, UK Science Park Association.
  25. UKSPA (2003) Evaluation of the past and future economic contribution of the UK Science Park Movement, UKSPA(The United Kingdom Science Park Association). Available at: http://www.tamana.com/apps/cms/articlefiles/70-UKSPAEvaluation-ExecutiveSummary.pdf
  26. Wal, A. T., and Corbishley C. (2014) Imperial West as a world-leading Innovation District, Imperial College London.
  27. CITIE. http://citie.org/
  28. CITIE - Framework. http://citie.org/framework/
  29. Smart Specialisation Platforms - Science Parks. http://s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/science-parks

Cited by

  1. STP Development in the Context of Smart City vol.8, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.7165/wtr19s1223.21