DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Influence of the Wafer Resistivity for Dopant-Free Silicon Heterojunction Solar Cell

실리콘 웨이퍼 비저항에 따른 Dopant-Free Silicon Heterojunction 태양전지 특성 연구

  • Kim, Sung Hae (Department of Materials and Chemical Engineering, Hanyang University) ;
  • Lee, Jung-Ho (Department of Materials and Chemical Engineering, Hanyang University)
  • 김성해 (재료화학공학과, 한양대학교 ERICA캠퍼스) ;
  • 이정호 (재료화학공학과, 한양대학교 ERICA캠퍼스)
  • Received : 2018.04.26
  • Accepted : 2018.06.09
  • Published : 2018.06.30

Abstract

Dopant-free silicon heterojunction solar cells using Transition Metal Oxide(TMO) such as Molybdenum Oxide($MoO_X$) and Vanadium Oxide($V_2O_X$) have been focused on to increase the work function of TMO in order to maximize the work function difference between TMO and n-Si for a high-efficiency solar cell. One another way to increase the work function difference is to control the silicon wafer resistivity. In this paper, dopant-free silicon heterojunction solar cells were fabricated using the wafer with the various resistivity and analyzed to understand the effect of n-Si work function. As a result, it is shown that the high passivation and junction quality when $V_2O_X$ deposited on the wafer with low work function compared to the high work function wafer, inducing the increase of higher collection probability, especially at long wavelength region. the solar cell efficiency of 15.28% was measured in low work function wafer, which is 34% higher value than the high work function solar cells.

Keywords

References

  1. Bullock J, Efficient silicon solar cells with dopantfree asymmetric heterocontacts, Nature Energy, 2016, 1, 15031 https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2015.31
  2. Almora O, Superior performance of $V_2O_5$ as hole selective contact over other transition metal oxides in silicon heterojunction solar cells, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 2017, 168, 221-226 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2017.04.042
  3. Mews M, Oxygen vacancies in tungsten oxide and their influence on tungsten oxide_silicon heterojunction solar cells, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 2016, 158, 77-83 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2016.05.042
  4. Bullock J, Lithium Fluoride Based Electron Contacts for High Efficiency n-type Crystalline Silicon Solar cells, Adv. Energy Mater, 2016, 6, 1600241 https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201600241
  5. Wan Y, Conductive and Stable Magnesium Oxide Electron Selective Contacts for Efficient Silicon solar cells, Adv. Energy Mater, 2017, 7, 1601863 https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201601863
  6. L.G. Gerling, Origin of passivation in holeselective transition metal oxides for crystalline silicon heterojunction solar cells, J. Mater. Res, 2017, 32, 260-268 https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2016.453
  7. Liu X, Effect of oxygten plasma treatment on air exposed MoOx thin film, Org, Electron, 2014, 15, 977-983 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgel.2014.02.011
  8. Irfan I, Work function recovery of air exposed molybdenum oxide thin films, Appl. Phys. Lett, 2012, 101, 093305 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4748978
  9. L.G. Gerling, S. Mahato, A. Morales-Vilches, G. Masmitja,P. Ortega, C. Voz, R. Alcubilla, and J. Puigdollers, Transition metal oxides as holeselective contacts in silicon heterojunctions solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells, 2016, 145, 109-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2015.08.028
  10. Wu, W, Dopant free multilayer back contact silicon solar cells employing V2Ox_Metal_V2Ox as an emitter, RSC Adv, 2017, 7, 23851-23858 https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA03368K