DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Orthophotos and 3D Models Generated by UAV-Based Oblique Images Taken in Various Angles

  • Lee, Ki Rim (School of Geospatial Information, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Han, You Kyung (School of Convergence & Fusion System Engineering, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Won Hee (School of Convergence & Fusion System Engineering, Kyungpook National University)
  • Received : 2018.04.23
  • Accepted : 2018.06.07
  • Published : 2018.06.30

Abstract

Due to intelligent transport systems, location-based applications, and augmented reality, demand for image maps and 3D (Three-Dimensional) maps is increasing. As a result, data acquisition using UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles) has flourished in recent years. However, even though orthophoto map production and research using UAVs are flourishing, few studies on 3D modeling have been conducted. In this study, orthophoto and 3D modeling research was performed using various angle images acquired by a UAV. For orthophotos, accuracy was evaluated using a GPS (Global Positioning System) survey that employed VRS (Virtual Reference Station) acquired checkpoints. 3D modeling was evaluated by calculating the RMSE (Root Mean Square Error) of the difference between the outline height values of buildings obtained from the GPS survey to the corresponding 3D modeling height values. The orthophotos satisfied the acceptable accuracy of NGII (National Geographic Information Institute) for a 1/500 scale map from all angles. In the case of 3D modeling, models based on images taken at 45 degrees revealed better accuracy of building outlines than models based on images taken at 30, 60, or 75 degrees. To summarize, it was shown that for orthophotos, the accuracy for 1/500 maps was satisfied at all angles; for 3D modeling, images taken at 45 degrees produced the most accurate models.

Keywords

References

  1. Chiabrando, F., D'Andria, F., Sammartano, G., and Spano, A. (2018), UAV photogrammetry for archaeological site survey. 3D models at the Hierapolis in Phrygia (Turkey), Virtual Archaeology Review, Vol. 9, No. 18, pp. 28-43. https://doi.org/10.4995/var.2018.5958
  2. Doneus, M., Verhoeven, G., Fera, M., Briese, C., Kucera, M., and Neubauer, W. (2011), From deposit to point cloud-a study of low-cost computer vision approaches for the straightforward documentation of archaeological excavations, Geoinformatics FCE CTU, Vol. 6, pp. 81-88. https://doi.org/10.14311/gi.6.11
  3. Eker, R., Aydin, A., and Hubl, J. (2018), Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based monitoring of a landslide: Gallenzerkogel landslide (Ybbs-Lower Austria) case study, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, Vol. 190, No. 1, pp. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6336-1
  4. Han, S.H. and Hong, C.K. (2017), Acquisition of subcentimeter GSD images using UAV and analysis of visual resolution, Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography, Vol. 35, No. 6, pp. 563- 572. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.7848/KSGPC.2017.35.6.563
  5. Hartley, R.I. (1997), Self-calibration of stationary cameras, International Journal of Computer Vision, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 5-23. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007957826135
  6. Han, Y.K., Byun, Y.G., Choi, J.W., Han, D.Y., and Kim, Y.I. (2012), Automatic registration of high-resolution images using local properties of features, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, Vol. 78, No. 3, pp. 211-221. https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.78.3.211
  7. Khaloo, A., Lattanzi, D., Cunningham, K., Dell'Andrea, R., and Riley, M. (2018), Unmanned aerial vehicle inspection of the Placer River Trail Bridge through image-based 3D modelling, Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 124-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2017.1330891
  8. Lee, K.R. and Lee, W.H. (2017), Comparison of orthophoto and 3D modeling using vertical and high oblique images taken by UAV, Journal of the Korean Society for Geospatial Information Science, Vol. 25, No. 4, pp. 35-45.
  9. Lim, Y.S., La, P.H., Park, J.S., Lee, M.H., Pyeon, M.W., and Kim, J.I. (2015), Calculation of tree height and canopy crown from drone images using segmentation, Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography, Vol. 33, No. 6, pp. 605-613. https://doi.org/10.7848/ksgpc.2015.33.6.605
  10. Lin, Y., Jiang, M., Yao, Y., Zhang, L., and Lin, J. (2015), Use of UAV oblique imaging for the detection of individual trees in residential environments, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 404-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.03.003
  11. Lucieer, A., Jong, S.M.D., and Turner, D. (2014), Mapping landslide displacements using Structure from Motion (SfM) and image correlation of multi-temporal UAV photography, Progress in Physical Geography, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 97-116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133313515293
  12. Rossi, P., Mancini, F., Dubbini, M., Mazzone, F., and Capra, A. (2017), Combining nadir and oblique UAV imagery to reconstruct quarry topography: methodology and feasibility analysis, European Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 211-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2017.1313097
  13. Uysal, M., Toprak, A.S., and Polat, N. (2015), DEM generation with UAV photogrammetry and accuracy analysis in Sahitler Hill, Measurement, Vol. 73, pp. 539-543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.06.010
  14. Verhoeven, G. (2011), Taking computer vision aloft-archaeological three-dimensional reconstructions from aerial photographs with photoscan, Archaeological Prospection, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 67-73. https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.399
  15. Wang, L., Niu, Z., Wu, C., Xie, R., and Huang, H. (2012), A robust multisource image automatic registration system based on the SIFT descriptor, International Journal of Remote Sensing, Vol. 33, No. 12, pp. 3850-3869. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2011.636079
  16. Watanabe, Y. and Kawahara, Y. (2016), UAV photogrammetry for monitoring changes in river topography and vegetation, Procedia Engineering, Vol. 154, pp. 317-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.482

Cited by

  1. 네트워크 RTK 무인기의 항공삼각측량 정확도 평가 vol.38, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.7848/ksgpc.2020.38.6.663
  2. 연직사진과 경사사진을 함께 이용한 UAV 사진측량의 정확도 평가 연구 vol.39, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.7848/ksgpc.2021.39.1.41