구강회복응용과학지 (Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science)

  • 제34권2호
  • /
  • Pages.97-103
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2384-4353(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-4272(eISSN)
대한턱관절교합학회 (Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

콘빔형 전산화단층영상을 이용한 한국인의 본윌 삼각에 대한 평가

Evaluation of Bonwill triangle using cone beam computerized tomography in Korean

  • 공현준 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 오상천 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Kong, Hyun-Jun (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Oh, Sang-Chun (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
  • 투고 : 2018.02.06
  • 심사 : 2018.03.05
  • 발행 : 2018.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적: 본 연구의 목적은 콘빔형 전산화단층영상(cone-beam computerized tomography)을 이용하여 한국인의 본윌 삼각을 평가함으로써 그간 서양인을 기준으로 제시된 본윌 삼각 관련 수치와 비교하기 위함이다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 원광대학교 치과대학 대전치과병원에 내원하여 Cone-beam CT를 촬영한 환자 중, 본 연구의 기준에 적합한 한국인 120명(남성 60명, 여성 60명)이 선택되었으며 Invivo 5.1 (Anatomage, San Jose, USA)가 Cone-beam CT scan을 분석하기 위해 사용되었다. 축의 방향설정을 시행한 후, 과두간 거리는 각 과두의 중심점을 지정하여 측정하였으며, 과두-절치간 거리는 과두 중심점과 하악 양 중절치 절단연의 접촉점을 지정하여 측정하였다. 수집된 자료는 SPSS Version 23.0 (IBM Inc., Armonk, USA)을 이용하여 분석하였고, independent t-test를 이용하여 성별에 따른 통계적 유의성을 검증하였다. 결과: 한국인의 평균 과두간 거리는 105.9 mm였으며, 남성(108.3 mm)이 여성(103.4 mm)에 비해 통계학적으로 유의하게 크게 나타났다. 한국인의 평균 과두-절치간 거리는 105.2 mm였으며, 남성(108.1 mm)이 여성(102.3 mm)에 비해 통계학적으로 유의하게 크게 나타났다. 결론: 본 연구에서 측정된 한국인의 과두간 거리는 105.9 mm로 서양인을 대상으로 제시된 110 mm에 비해 작은 값을 보였으며, 남성이 여성에 비해 통계학적으로 유의하게 크게 나타났다. 본 제한된 연구 결과를 근거로 한국인의 보철적 수복 시 과두간 거리를 좀 더 개인에 맞게 조절할 수 있는 교합기 사용이 필요하다고 사료된다.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the Bonwill triangle of Korean using the cone beam computerized tomography (Cone-beam CT). Materials and Methods: 120 Koreans (60 males and 60 females) who visited Daejeon Dental College Hospital of Wonkwang University and who underwent the Cone-beam CT were selected. The Cone-beam CT images were analysed with Invivo 5.1 (Anatomage, San Jose, USA). After reorientation of axis, the intercondylar distance was measured by clicking both middle points of condyle. And the condyle-incisor distance was measured by clicking the middle point of condyle and contact point of the mandibular central incisor's incisal edge. The collected data were analysed using the SPSS Version 23.0 (IBM Inc., Armonk, USA) and statistical significance was verified by gender using independent t-test. Results: The mean intercondylar distance of Korean was 105.9 mm, and the male (108.3 mm) was statistically significantly larger than the female (103.4 mm). The mean condyle-incisor distance of Korean was 105.2 mm, and the male (108.1 mm) was statistically significantly larger than the female (102.3 mm). Conclusion: The mean intercondylar distance of Korean in this study was 105.9 mm that was smaller than well-known 110 mm of Caucasian and the male was statistically significantly larger than the female. Within the limitations of this study, it would be necessary to use the articulator which can adjust the intercondylar distance according to the individual for prosthodontic treatment of Korean.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. The Academy of Prosthodontics. The glossary of prosthodontics terms. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:10-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.03.013
  2. Jain AR. Articulators through the years revisited: from 1700 to 1900-part I. World J Dent 2015;6:222-5. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1347
  3. Lee SH. Fixed prosthodontics. 2nd ed. Seoul; Jisung Publishing Co.; 2007. p. 101-2.
  4. Keshvad A, Winstanley RB, Hooshmand T. Intercondylar width as a guide to setting up complete denture teeth. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:217-26. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00509.x
  5. Tradowsy M. Sex difference in intercondylar distance. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:301-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90200-V
  6. Lazic B, Tepavcevic B, Keros J, Komar D, Stanicic T, Azinovic Z. Intercondylar distances of the human temporomandibular joints. Coll Antropol 2006;30: 37-41.
  7. Lee KY, Lee DJ. A comparative study of teeth and dental arch of Korean and Caucasian. Oral Biol Res 1993;71:1-15.
  8. Song WC, Yun KH, Koh KS. Facial flatness of Korean: using facial depth. Korean J Anat 2003;36: 499-506.
  9. Kook YA, Nojima K, Moon HB, McLaughlin RP, Sinclair PM. Comparison of arch forms between Korean and North American white populations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:680-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.10.038
  10. Hwang HS, Kim WS, McNamara JA Jr. Ethnic differences in the soft tissue profile of Korean and European-American adults with normal occlusions and well-balanced faces. Angle Orthod 2002;72:72- 80.
  11. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Miani A Jr, Colombo A, Tartaglia G. Mathematical definition of the curve of Spee in permanent healthy dentitions in man. Arch Oral Biol 1992;37:691-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(92)90073-H
  12. Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Miani A Jr, Tartaglia G. Mathematical definition of the shape of dental arches in human permanent healthy dentitions. Eur J Orthod 1994;16:287-94. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/16.4.287
  13. Bayome M, Park JH, Kook YA. New three-dimensional cephalometric analyses among adults with a skeletal Class I pattern and normal occlusion. Korean J Orthod 2013;43:62-73. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2013.43.2.62
  14. Naji P, Alsufyani NA, Lagravere MO. Reliability of anatomic structures as landmarks in three-dimensional cephalometric analysis using CBCT. Angle Orthod 2014;84:762-72. https://doi.org/10.2319/090413-652.1
  15. Beck HO. Choosing the articulator. J Am Dent Assoc 1962;64:468-75. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1962.0121
  16. Hobo S, Shillingburg HT Jr, Whitsett LD. Articulator selection for restorative dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1976;36:35-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(76)90231-6
  17. Oh SC, Kim SG, Kim YJ. An evaluation of curve of Spee using cone beam computerized tomography in Korea. J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci 2014;30:93- 101. https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2014.30.2.93
  18. Lundstrom A. Some asymmertries of the dental arches, Jaws, and skull, and their etiological significance.Am J Orthod 1961;47:81-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(61)90205-6
  19. Williamson EH, Simmons MD. Mandibular asymmetry and its relation to pain dysfunction. Am J Orthod 1979;76:612-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(79)90207-0