DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Pseudoglandular Formation in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Determines Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Diffusion-Weighted MRI

  • Park, In Kyung (Department of Radiology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Yu, Jeong-Sik (Department of Radiology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Cho, Eun-Suk (Department of Radiology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Joo Hee (Department of Radiology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Chung, Jae-Joon (Department of Radiology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2018.02.26
  • Accepted : 2018.03.27
  • Published : 2018.06.30

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the impact of pseudoglandular formation on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and to validate the results using histopathological grades. Materials and Methods: We assessed 182 HCCs surgically resected from 169 consecutive patients. Each type of tumor pseudoglandular formation was categorized into "non-," "mixed-," or "pure-," based on official histopathology reports. The ADC for each tumor was independently measured, using the largest region of interest on the ADC map. Data were assessed using the analysis of variance test, with Bonferroni correction for post hoc analysis to stratify the relationship of ADCs with pseudoglandular formation, followed by subgroup analysis according to the histopathological tumor grades. Results: The mean ADC was significantly higher in pure pseudoglandular lesions (n = 5, $1.29{\pm}0.08{\times}10^{-3}mm^2/s$) than in non-pseudoglandular lesions (n = 132, $1.08{\pm}0.17{\times}10^{-3}mm^2/s$; P = 0.003) or mixed-pseudoglandular lesions (n = 45, $1.16{\pm}0.24{\times}10^{-3}mm^2/s$; P = 0.034). The ADC values and pseudoglandular formation were significantly correlated in moderately differentiated HCCs (n = 103; r = 0.307, P = 0.007), while well- (n = 19) and poorly-differentiated HCCs (n = 60) did not show significant correlation (r = 0.105 and 0.068, respectively; P = 0.600 and 0.685, respectively). Conclusion: The degree of pseudoglandular formation could be one of the determinants of ADC in DWI of HCCs-especially moderately differentiated HCCs-while its influence does not appear to be significant in well- or poorly differentiated HCCs.

Keywords

References

  1. Rampone B, Schiavone B, Martino A, Viviano C, Confuorto G. Current management strategy of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2009;15:3210-3216 https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.15.3210
  2. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2015;65:87-108 https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21262
  3. Jensen JH, Helpern JA, Ramani A, Lu H, Kaczynski K. Diffusional kurtosis imaging: the quantification of nongaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 2005;53:1432-1440 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.20508
  4. Kele PG, van der Jagt EJ. Diffusion weighted imaging in the liver. World J Gastroenterol 2010;16:1567-1576 https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v16.i13.1567
  5. Parikh T, Drew SJ, Lee VS, et al. Focal liver lesion detection and characterization with diffusion-weighted MR imaging: comparison with standard breath-hold T2-weighted imaging. Radiology 2008;246:812-822 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2463070432
  6. Lowenthal D, Zeile M, Lim WY, et al. Detection and characterisation of focal liver lesions in colorectal carcinoma patients: comparison of diffusion-weighted and Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MR imaging. Eur Radiol 2011;21:832-840 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-1977-2
  7. Lee MH, Kim SH, Park MJ, Park CK, Rhim H. Gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepatobiliary phase MRI and high-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging to distinguish well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinomas from benign nodules in patients with chronic liver disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197:W868-875 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.6237
  8. Inchingolo R, De Gaetano AM, Curione D, et al. Role of diffusion-weighted imaging, apparent diffusion coefficient and correlation with hepatobiliary phase findings in the differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma from dysplastic nodules in cirrhotic liver. Eur Radiol 2015;25:1087-1096 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3500-7
  9. Muhi A, Ichikawa T, Motosugi U, et al. High-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging of hepatocellular lesions: estimation of grade of malignancy of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;30:1005-1011 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21931
  10. Heo SH, Jeong YY, Shin SS, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient value of diffusion-weighted imaging for hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation with the histologic differentiation and the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor. Korean J Radiol 2010;11:295-303 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2010.11.3.295
  11. Nishie A, Tajima T, Asayama Y, et al . Diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient for predicting histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Radiol 2011;80:e29-33 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.06.019
  12. Chang WC, Chen RC, Chou CT, et al. Histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma correlates with arterial enhancement on gadoxetic acid-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images. Abdom Imaging 2014;39:1202-1212 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-014-0168-z
  13. Chen J, Wu M, Liu R, Li S, Gao R, Song B. Preoperative evaluation of the histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma with diffusion-weighted imaging: a metaanalysis. PLoS One 2015;10:e0117661 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117661
  14. Guo W, Zhao S, Yang Y, Shao G. Histological grade of hepatocellular carcinoma predicted by quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging. Int J Clin Exp Med 2015;8:4164-4169
  15. Tang Y, Wang H, Ma L, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of hepatocellular carcinomas: a retrospective analysis of correlation between apparent diffusion coefficients and histological grade. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2016;41:1539-1545 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0715-x
  16. Li X, Zhang K, Shi Y, Wang F, Meng X. Correlations between the minimum and mean apparent diffusion coefficient values of hepatocellular carcinoma and tumor grade. J Magn Reson Imaging 2016;44:1442-1447 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25323
  17. Noworolski SM, Vigneron DB, Chen AP, Kurhanewicz J. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and MR diffusion imaging to distinguish between glandular and stromal prostatic tissues. Magn Reson Imaging 2008;26:1071-1080 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2008.01.033
  18. Wang Y, Chen ZE, Nikolaidis P, et al . Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of pancreatic adenocarcinomas: association with histopathology and tumor grade. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;33:136-142 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.22414
  19. Yu JS, Kim JH, Chung JJ, Kim KW. Added value of diffusion-weighted imaging in the MRI assessment of perilesional tumor recurrence after chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;30:153-160 https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.21818
  20. Theise ND, Park YN, Curado MP, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma. In Bosman FT, Carneiro F, Hruban RH, eds. WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system. 4th ed. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2010:205-216
  21. Woo S, Lee JM, Yoon JH, Joo I, Han JK, Choi BI. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation with enhancement degree and histologic grade. Radiology 2014;270:758-767 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13130444
  22. Granata V, Fusco R, Catalano O, et al. Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation with histologic grade. Oncotarget 2016;7:79357-79364
  23. Shan Q, Chen J, Zhang T, et al. Evaluating histologic differentiation of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma using intravoxel incoherent motion and AFP levels alone and in combination. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2017;42:2079-2088 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1107-6