기술혁신학회지 (Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society)

  • 제21권4호
  • /
  • Pages.1508-1535
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1598-2912(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-8666(eISSN)
한국기술혁신학회 (Korea Technology Innovation Society)
권호 표지

프로세스 관점에서의 기술혁신 및 고용성과에 관한 연구 : 중소기업을 중심으로

A Study on Technological Innovation and Employment Performance from the Perspective of Process : Focused on Small and Medium Sized Enterprises

  • 봉강호 (건국대학교 기술경영학과) ;
  • 박재민 (건국대학교 기술경영학과)
  • 투고 : 2018.08.24
  • 심사 : 2018.10.09
  • 발행 : 2018.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

기업들에 있어서 고용은 혁신활동의 결과를 바탕으로 하는 연속된 의사결정과정이다. 따라서 기술혁신을 통한 고용성과를 살펴봄에 있어서 이 같은 관계성을 명시적으로 분석에 고려할 필요가 있다. 이러한 문제의식을 바탕으로 본 연구에서는 중소기업의 기술혁신과 고용효과의 관계를 선행 연구와 같이 단일방정식을 추정하는 순위로짓(ordered logit) 모형으로 분석할 뿐 아니라, 연립방정식을 추정하는 외견무관회귀(SUR) 모형을 활용하여 실제 동시적으로 수행되어지는 기술경영 과정의 상관성을 반영하여 기업의 혁신활동과 기술혁신 성과, 보상제도 그리고 고용 창출의 구조적 관계를 분석하고자 하였다. 분석 결과, 보상제도의 시행은 기술개발 및 기술사업화 성과를 높이고, 이것은 다시 기업의 고용을 촉진하는 구조적 관계를 확인할 수 있었다. 특히 고용성과에 있어 기술개발 뿐 아니라 사업화 성과가 일종의 허들로 작용한다는 점에서 기술혁신을 프로세스 관점에서 관리할 때 기업의 고용성과는 높아진다고 볼 수 있겠다.

Employment in enterprises is a consecutive decision-making process based on the results of their innovative activities and it is necessary to consider this relationship as well explicitly in an analysis of the employment performance through technological innovation. Based on this critical mind, this study would analyze the structural relationships among enterprises' innovative activities, the performance of technological innovation, a compensation system and the creation of employment, reflecting the correlation of the process of the actual technology management performed simultaneously, utilizing the seemingly unrelated regression(SUR) model to estimate a simultaneous equation in addition to analyzing the relationship between technological innovation and the effect on employment with the ordered logit model to estimate a single equation as in the preceding studies. As a result of the analysis, a structural relationship could be found out, in which the execution of the compensation system would increase the performances of technical development and technology commercialization, which in turn, accelerates enterprises' employment. Especially, it is judged that enterprises' employment performance increases when technological innovation is managed from a process perspective in that the commercialization performance, as well as technical development, acts as a kind of hurdle in the effect on employment.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 고윤성.최형규 (2017), "연구개발투자 및 설비투자와 고용창출, 그리고 기업성과에 대한 연구", 회계정보연구, 35(2): 115-141.
  2. 김건식 (2013), "중소 제조업의 기술개발 영향요인과 개발성과 간의 인과경로 : 기술개발 단계별 분석", 중소기업연구, 35(4): 25-56.
  3. 김영준.송경모.민재웅.윤지환.조용덕 (2017), 기술경영학개론, 서울 : 탐진.
  4. 문성배 (2015), "서비스 기업의 기술혁신이 고용창출에 미치는 영향 분석", 한국경제연구, 33(4): 5-29.
  5. 문성배.전현배 (2008), "기술혁신활동의 고용효과에 관한 실증 분석 : ICT기업과 비ICT기업의 비교를 중심으로", 산업조직연구, 16(1): 1-24.
  6. 박상문.서종현 (2012), "중소기업의 기술경영 활동수준과 기술역량 및 기술혁신 애로요인간의 관계", 중소기업연구, 34(2): 81-99.
  7. 박성근.김병근 (2011), "한국의 서비스업에서 기술혁신전략이 고용에 미치는 영향 : 기업수준의 연구", 기술혁신학회지, 14(2): 223-245.
  8. 박재민.이중만 (2011), "기업의 혁신 활동이 기업성과에 미치는 영향", 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 11(3): 339-350. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2011.11.3.339
  9. 배영임 (2015), "중소기업 R&D활동이 고용창출에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 : 정부R&D 지원의 조절효과를 중심으로", 벤처창업연구, 10(3): 75-83.
  10. 봉강호.박재민.김재영 (2018), "중소기업의 기술협력이 혁신성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 : 자원기반이론 관점에서", 기술혁신연구, 26(3): 98-128. https://doi.org/10.14386/SIME.2018.26.3.98
  11. 이공래 (2000), 기술혁신이론 개관, 서울 : 과학기술정책연구원.
  12. 이지우 (2011), "중소제조기업의 인적자원관리제도 도입 및 활용정도와 조직성과의 관계", 인적자원관리연구, 18(4): 23-46.
  13. 이종민.노민선.정선양 (2013), "중소기업의 기술기획 역량이 기술사업화 성공에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 기술혁신연구, 21(1): 253-278.
  14. 이후성.이정수.박재민 (2015), "정부 R&D지원 유형에 따른 중소기업 기술적 성과 분석", 기술혁신학회지, 18(1): 73-97.
  15. 전승표.성태응.서주환 (2016), "중소기업 R&D 정보 지원과 성과의 관계에 대한 연구 : ICT 기업을 중심으로", 기술혁신학회지, 19(1): 48-79.
  16. 정선양 (2016), 전략적 기술경영, 제4판, 서울 : 박영사.
  17. 조가원.김선우.조용래.강희종.손수아.목은지.구원모.김상신.오완근 (2017), 2017년 한국 기업혁신조사 : 제조업 및 서비스업 부문 - 한국기업혁신조사의 동향과 활용, 조사연구 2017-03, 세종 : 과학기술정책연구원.
  18. 중소벤처기업부.중소기업중앙회 (2017), 2017년 중소기업기술통계조사 보고서, 대전, 서울 : 동 기관.
  19. Aghion, P. and Howitt, P. (1998), Endogenous Growth Theory, Cambridge: MIT Press.
  20. Barringer, B. R., Jones, F. F. and Neubaum, D. O. (2005), "A Quantitative Content Analysis of the Characteristics of Rapid-growth Firms and Their Founders", Journal of Business Venturing, 20(5): 663-687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.03.004
  21. Berndt, E. R. and Christensen, L. R. (1973), "The Translog Function and the Substitution of Equipment, Structures, and Labor in US Manufacturing 1929-68", Journal of Econometrics, 1(1): 81-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(73)90007-9
  22. Bottazzi, G., Dosi, G., Lippi, M., Pammolli, F. and Riccaboni, M. (2001), "Innovation and Corporate Growth in the Evolution of the Drug Industry", International Journal of Industrial Organization, 19(7): 1161-1187. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(01)00068-6
  23. Brown, M. G. and Svenson, R. A. (1998), "Measuring R&D Productivity", Research Technology Management, 31(4): 11-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.1988.11670531
  24. Brown, S. L. and Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997), "The Art of Continuous Change: Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations", Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1): 1-35. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393807
  25. Cameron, A. C. and Trivedi, P. K. (2010), Microeconometrics Using Stata, Revised Edition, College Station: Stata Press.
  26. Cetindamar, D., Phaal, R. and Probert, D. (2009), "Understanding Technology Management as a Dynamic Capability: A Framework for Technology Management Activities", Technovation, 29(4): 237-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.004
  27. Chandler, A. D. (1962), Strategy and Structure, Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  28. Cohen, W. M. and Klepper, S. (1992), "The Anatomy of Industry R&D Intensity Distributions", The American Economic Review, 82(4): 773-799.
  29. Cooper, R. G. (1994), "Perspective Third-Generation New Product Processes", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11(1): 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.1110003
  30. D'Andria, D. and Uebelmesser, S. (2016), "The Relationship between R&D Intensity and Profit-sharing Schemes: Evidence from Germany and the United Kingdom", Demographischer Wandel - Session: Firm Investment and Innovation: Empirical Studies, C24-V2, 1-35, http://hdl.handle.net/10419/145622.
  31. David, P., Hall, B. and Toole, A. (2000), "Is Public R&D a Complement or Substitute for Private R&D?: A Review of the Econometric Evidence", Research Policy, 29(4): 497-529. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00087-6
  32. Delery, J. E. and Doty, D. H. (1996), "Modes of Theorizing in Strategic Human Resource Management: Tests of Universalistic, Contingency, and Configurational Performance Predictions", Academy of Management Journal, 39(4): 802-835. https://doi.org/10.2307/256713
  33. Doughery, D. (2001), "Reimagining the Differentiation and Integration of Work for Sustained Product Innovation", Organization Science, 12(5): 612-631. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.5.612.10096
  34. Drongelen, I. C. K. and Bilderbeek, J. (1999), "R&D Performance Measurement: More than Choosing a Set of Metrics", R&D Management, 29(1): 35-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00115
  35. Entorf, H. and Pohlmeier, W. (1990), "Employment, Innovation and Export Activity: Evidence from Firm-Level Data", in J-P. Florens, M. Ivaldi, J-J. Laffont and F. Laisney(eds.), Microeconometrics: Surveys and Applications, Oxford: Basil-Blackwell, 394-415.
  36. Evangelista, R. and Savona, M. (2003), "Innovation, Employment and Skills in Services. Firm and Sectoral Evidence", Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 14(4): 449-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0954-349X(03)00030-4
  37. Fabi, B., Raymond, L. and Lacoursiere, R. (2007), "HRM Practice Clusters in Relation to Size and Performance: An Empirical Investigation in Canadian Manufacturing SMEs", Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 20(1): 25-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2007.10593384
  38. Freel, M. S. (2000), "Do Small Innovating Firms Outperform Non-Innovators?", Small Business Economics, 14(3): 195-210. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008100206266
  39. Freeman, C., Clark, J. and Soete, L. (1982), Unemployment and Technical Innovation: A Study of Long Wave and Economic Development, Westport: Greenwood.
  40. Gali, J. (1999), "Technology, Employment, and the Business Cycle: Do Technology Shocks Explain Aggregate Fluctuations?", American Economic Review, 89(1): 249-271. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.1.249
  41. Glaeser, E. L., Kallal, H. D., Scheinkman, J. A. and Shleifer, A. (1992), "Growth in Cities", The Journal of Political Economy, 100(6): 1126-1152. https://doi.org/10.1086/261856
  42. Greenan, N. and Guellec, D. (2000), "Technological Innovation and Employment Reallocation", Labour, 14(4): 547-590. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9914.00146
  43. Greene, W. (2000), Econometric Analysis, 7th ed., Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
  44. Gregory, M. J. (1995), "Technology Management: A Process Approach", Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 209(5): 347-356. https://doi.org/10.1243/PIME_PROC_1995_209_094_02
  45. Hall, B. and Van Reenen, J. (2000), "How Effective are Fiscal Incentives for R&D?: A Review of the Evidence", Research Policy, 29(4): 449-469. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00085-2
  46. Harden, E. A., Kruse, D. L. and Blasi, J. R. (2010), "Who Has a Better Idea? Innovation, Shared Capitalism, and Human Resources Policies", in D. L. Kruse, R. B. Freeman and J. R. Blasi(eds.), Shared Capitalism at Work: Employee Ownership, Profit and Gain Sharing, and Broad-based Stock Options, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 225-253.
  47. Hurmelinna, P. and Puumalainen, K. (2007), "Nature and Dynamics of Appropriability: Strategies of Appropriating Returns on Innovation", R&D Management, 37(2): 95-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2007.00460.x
  48. Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A. and Simon, D. G. (2003), "A Model of Strategic Entrepreneurship: The Construct and its Dimensions", Journal of Management, 29(6): 963-989. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00086-2
  49. Jensen, M. C. and Meckling, W. H. (1976), "Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure", Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  50. Kraft, K. and Lang, J. (2013), "Profit Sharing and Training", Oxford Bulletin of Economic and Statistics, 75(6): 940-961. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2012.00714.x
  51. Lachenmaier, S. and Rottmann, H. (2007), "Employment Effects of Innovation at the Firm Level", Journal of Economics and Statistics, 227(3): 254-272.
  52. Levin, R. C., Klevorick, A. K., Nelson, R. and Winter, S. (1987), "Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development", Brookings Papers on Economics Activity, 18(3): 783-831.
  53. Lin, B. W., Lee, Y. and Hung, S. C. (2006), "R&D Intensity and Commercialization Orientation Effects on Financial Performance", Journal of Business Research, 59(5): 679-685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.01.002
  54. Lopez-Garcia, P. and Puente, S. (2012), "What Makes a High-growth Firm? A Dynamic Probit Analysis Using Spanish Firm-level Data", Small Business Economics, 39(4): 1029-1041. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9321-z
  55. Miller, W. L. and Morris, L. (2008), Fourth Generation R&D: Managing Knowledge, Technology, and Innovation, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  56. Mogee, M. E. (1993), "Educating Innovation Managers: Strategic Issues for Business and Higher Education", IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 40(4): 410-417. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.257734
  57. OECD (2005), Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd ed., Paris: OECD Publishing.
  58. OECD (2017), "Status Report on the Revision OSLO MANUAL on Measuring Innovation".
  59. Pavitt, K. (1984), "Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory", Research Policy, 13(6): 343-373. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0
  60. Pisano, G. (2010), "The Evolution of Science-based Business: Innovating How Innovate", Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(2): 465-482. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtq013
  61. Porter, L. M. and Lawler, E. E. (1968), Managerial Attitudes and Performance, New York: Irwin-Dorsey.
  62. Prahalad, C. K. and Hamel, G. (1990), "The Core Competence of the Corporation", Harvard Business Review, May-June, 79-91.
  63. Rogers, E. M. (1995), Diffusion of Innovations, 4th ed., New York: The Free Press.
  64. Rosegger, G. (1986), The Economics of Production and Innovation, 2nd ed., Oxford: Pergamon Press.
  65. Rosenberg, N. (1976), Perspective on Technology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  66. Rothwell, R. and Zegveld, W. (1985), Reindustrialization and Technology, New York: M. E. Sharpe.
  67. Scherer, F. M. and Ross, D. (1990), Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
  68. Schilling, M. A. (2016), Strategic Management of Technological Innovation, 5th ed., New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
  69. Schuler, R. S. and Jackson, S. E. (1987), "Organizational Strategy and Organization Level as Determinants of Human Resource Management Practices", Human Resource Planning, 10(3): 125-141.
  70. Schumpeter, A. (1934), The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest Rates and the Business Cycle, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  71. Schuster, M. (1984), "The Scanlon Plan: A Longitudinal Analysis", The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 20(1): 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/002188638402000107
  72. Teece, D. and Pisano, G. (1994), "The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: An Introduction", Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3): 537-556.
  73. Tidd, J. and Bessant, J. (2013), Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change, 5th ed., Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  74. Van Reenen, J. (1997), "Technological Innovation and Employment in a Panel of British Manufacturing Firms", Journal of Labor Economics, 15(2): 255-284. https://doi.org/10.1086/209833
  75. Vivarelli, M., Evangelista, R. and Pianta, M. (1996), "Innovation and Employment in Italian Manufacturing Industry", Research Policy, 25(7): 1013-1026. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(95)00878-0
  76. Vivarelli, M. and Pianta, M. (2000), "The Employment Impact of Innovation: Evidence and Policy", Small Business Economics, 22(5): 417-420. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SBEJ.0000022291.88080.c1
  77. Von Hippel, E. (1976), "The Dominant Role of Users in the Scientific Instruments Innovation Process", Research Policy, 5(3): 212-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(76)90028-7
  78. Vroom, V. H. (1964), Work and Motivation, Oxford: Wiley.
  79. Zahra, S. A., Neubaum, D. O. and Huse, M. (2000), "Entrepreneurship in Medium-size Companies: Exploring the Effects of Ownership and Governance Systems", Journal of Management, 26(5): 947-976. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600509