DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

다른 발화 속도의 또렷한 음성과 대화체로 발화한 영어문장 인지

The perception of clear and casual English speech under different speed conditions

  • Yi, So Pae (Department of Defense Education Activity, Humphreys West Elementary School)
  • 투고 : 2018.05.18
  • 심사 : 2018.06.12
  • 발행 : 2018.06.30

초록

Korean students with much exposure to the relatively slow and clear speech used in most English classes in Korea can be expected to have difficulty understanding the casual style that is common in the everyday speech of English speakers. This research attempted to investigate an effective way to utilize casual speech in English education, by exploring the way different speech styles (clear vs. casual) affect Korean learners' comprehension of spoken English. Twenty Korean university students and two native speakers of English participated in a listening session. The English utterances were produced in different speech styles (clear slow, casual slow, clear fast, and casual fast). The Korean students were divided into two groups by English proficiency level. The results showed that the Korean students achieved 69.4% comprehension accuracy, while the native speakers of English demonstrated almost perfect results. The Korean students (especially the low-proficiency group) had more problems perceiving function words than they did perceiving content words. Responding to the different speech styles, the high-proficiency group had more difficulty listening to utterances with phonological variation than they did listening to utterances produced at a faster speed. The low-proficiency group, however, struggled with utterances produced at a faster speed more than they did with utterances with phonological variation. The pedagogical implications of the results are discussed in the concluding section.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Boersma, P., & Heuven, V. (2001). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5(9-10), 341-345.
  2. Bradlow, A. R., Kraus, N., & Hayes, E. (2003). Speaking clearly for learning-impaired children: Sentence perception in noise. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46(1), 80-97. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2003/007)
  3. Choi, I. (2010). Impact of varying degrees of English speech rate on listening comprehension. Multimedia Assisted Language Learning, 13(1), 99-119.
  4. Ferguson, S. H., & Kewley-Port, D. (2002). Vowel intelligibility in clear and conversational speech for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112(1), 259-271. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1482078
  5. Hazan, V., & Baker, R. (2010). Does reading clearly produce the same acoustic-phonetic modifications as spontaneous speech in a clear speaking style? DiSS-LPSS Joint Workshop 2010, Tokyo, 7-10.
  6. Hwang, S., & Yang, B. (2006). Students perception of linked or clear English speech. Speech Sciences, 13(3), 107-119.
  7. Kim, E., & Yang, B. (2004). Korean students' repetition of English sentences under noise and speed conditions. Speech Sciences, 11(2), 105-117.
  8. Krause, J. C., & Braida, L. D. (2004). Acoustic properties of naturally produced clear speech at normal speaking rates. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115(1), 362-378. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1635842
  9. Picheny, M. A., Durlach, N. I., & Braida, L. D. (1986). Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing ii: Acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 29(4), 434-446. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.2904.434
  10. Picheny, M. A., Durlach, N. I., & Braida, L. D. (1989). Speaking clearly for the hard of hearing iii: An attempt to determine the contribution of speaking rate to differences in intelligibility between clear and conversational speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 32, 600-603. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3203.600
  11. Yang, B. (2004). (No English title available) The Journal, College of Education Pusan National University, 43, 17-30.
  12. Yang, B. (2017). Google speech recognition of an English paragraph produced by college students in clear or casual speech styles. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 9(4), 43-50. https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2017.9.4.043