정보교육학회논문지 (Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education)

  • 제22권3호
  • /
  • Pages.345-356
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1229-3245(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-8428(eISSN)
한국정보교육학회 (Korea Association of Information Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

비버 챌린지 2017을 통한 초등학생들의 컴퓨팅 사고 수준 분석

Elementary School Students' Level of Computational Thinking through Bebras Challenge 2017

  • 투고 : 2018.05.23
  • 심사 : 2018.06.27
  • 발행 : 2018.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 논문의 목적은 비버 챌린지 2017의 국내 문항 및 응시 결과를 분석함으로써 초등학생들의 컴퓨팅 사고 수준을 파악하는 것이다. 이를 위해 비버 챌린지 2017의 '도전하기' 결과 데이터를 바탕으로 초등학생 그룹 II(초등 3 4학년)와 그룹 III(초등 5 6학년)의 평가 요소별, 성별, 학년별 성취도를 기술 통계 및 추리 통계를 통해 분석하였다. 분석 결과, 평가 요소별 성취도는 각 그룹 내에서 차이를 보였다. 또한, 성별에 따른 성취도는 그룹 II의 1개 영역을 제외하고는 유의한 차이가 나타나지 않았다. 학년별 성취도는 그룹 III에서 학년 간 차이가 통계적으로 유의미하게 나타났다. 이러한 연구 결과는 추후 초등학교 정보 교육에서 무엇을, 어떻게 평가할 수 있을지와 관련된 학생 수준에 관한 시사점을 제공하고, 후속 연구 수행에 기여할 것으로 기대한다.

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the elementary school students' level of computational thinking ability by analyzing the domestic question and examination results of Beaver Challenge 2017. Based on the results of the 'Challenge' results of Beaver Challenge 2017, the achievement by element, gender, and grade of elementary school students II (elementary school 3.4) and group III (elementary school 5.6) Respectively. As a result of the analysis, the achievement by the evaluation factors showed difference within each group. In addition, there was no significant difference in achievement according to gender except for one area of group II. The achievement level of each grade was statistically significant in the group III. The results of this study are expected to provide implications for the level of students related to what can be evaluated in elementary school information education and contribute to the follow-up research.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bebras Informatics Korea(2017). 2017 Plan of Bebras Informatics Korea(2017-CH-08b).
  2. Brenda C. Wilson(2010). A Study of Factors Promoting Success in Computer Science Including Gender Differences. Computer Science Education, 12(1-2), 141-164. https://doi.org/10.1076/csed.12.1.141.8211
  3. ByeongGeon Yu, JaMee Kim, WonGyu Lee(2012). Analysis on the Relation Between Programming Achievement and Problem Solving According to Gender. The Journal of Korea Association of Computer Education, 10(4), 27-37.
  4. ChanJung Park, JungSuk Hyun, HeuiLan Jin(2017). Analysis of Difference in Computer Programming Understanding Ability focused on Statement Structures between Genders and Abstract Thinking Levels of High School Students. The Journal of Korea Association of Computer Education, 19(6), 69-80.
  5. DongYun Kim(2017). Bebras challenge Introduction and Future Plan. The 1st Korea Information Science Education Federation conference.
  6. Jeannette M. Wing(2006). Computational Thinking. Communication of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
  7. Jeannette M. Wing(2008). Computational Thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society A, 366, 3717-3725. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0118
  8. Marina Papastergiou(2008). Are Computer Science and Information Technology still masculine fields? High school students' perceptions and career choices. Computers & Education, 51(2), 594-608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.06.009
  9. Ministry of Education (2015). Commentary to National Curriculum, Revised in 2017.
  10. The Korean Association of Computer Education, National IT Industry Promotion Agency (2014). Survey on current status and requirements of SW education in domestic and overseas.
  11. UngYeol Jung & YoungJun Lee(2017). The Applicability and Related Issues of Bebras Challenge in Informatics Education. The Journal of Korea Association of Computer Education, 20(5), 1-14.
  12. Valentina Dagien & Gerald Futschek(2008). Bebras international contest on informatics and computer literacy: Criteria for good tasks. International Conference on Informatics in Secondary Schools-Evolution and Perspectives, 19-30.
  13. Valentina Dagien & Gerald Futschek(2016). Bebras-a sustainable community building model for the concept based learning of informatics and computational thinking. Informatics in Education-An International Journal, 15(1), 25-44. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2016.02
  14. YongJu Jeon & TaeYoung Kim(2014). The Understanding of Software Education by the Analysis of International Trends, Proceedings of the Korean Association of Computer Education Conference, 18(2), 137-142.
  15. Bebras Challenge(2018). http://bebras.org
  16. Bebras Challenge Korea(2017). http://bebras.kr
  17. Computing At School(2013). Computing in the National Curriculum : A Guide for Primary Teachers. http://www.computingatschool.org.uk/data/uploads/CASPrimaryComputing.pdf
  18. Computing At School(2013). Computing in the National Curriculum : A Guide for Secondary Teachers. http://www.computingatschool.org.uk/data/uploads/CASPrimaryComputing.pdf
  19. Computer Science Teachers Association (2017). K-12 Computer Science Standards, Reviesd 2017, https://www.doe.k12.de.us/cms/lib/DE01922744/Centricity/Domain/176/CSTA%20Computer%20 Science%20Standards%20Revised%202017.pdf
  20. Department for Education(2013). National Curriculum in England: computing programmes of study. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-computing-programmes-of-study
  21. Korea Education and Research Information Science(2011). The Modeling of 21st Century Leaners' and Teachers' abilities. http://lib.keris.or.kr/search/media/imglist/CAT000000009855
  22. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning(2013.10.9.). Software, Tools for Realizing the Creative Economy. http://www.msip.go.kr/web/msipContents/contents.do?mId=NzM=
  23. OECD DeSeCo(2005). The Definition and Selection of Key Competencies. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/35070367.pdf
  24. Partnership for 21st Century Skills(2009). Framework for 21st Century Learning. http://www.p21.org
  25. Ungyeol Jung, Hakin Kim, Min Hyuk Lee, HyeonAh Lee & Seongjin Ahn(2018), A Study on the Factors Influencing Computational Thinking Ability of Secondary School Students in Bebras Challenge 2017, The Journal of Korea Association of Computer Education, 21(3), 21-33.
  26. World Economic Forum(2016). What are the 21st-century skills every student needs? https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/03/21st-century-skills-future-jobs-students

피인용 문헌

  1. 알고리즘 교육을 통한 비버챌린지 결과 분석 vol.23, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2019.23.1.65
  2. 로봇 활용 SW 교육에서 활동 및 학습 내용에 따른 학습자 흥미: 햄스터 로봇을 중심으로 vol.23, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2019.23.1.85
  3. A Study on the Effect of Bebras Challenge to Raise CT vol.20, pp.10, 2018, https://doi.org/10.9728/dcs.2019.20.10.1961
  4. 초등학교 소프트웨어교육에서 교구와 학습자 수준에 따른 컴퓨팅사고력 향상도 비교 vol.23, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.32431/kace.2020.23.2.004
  5. EXCEL VBA를 이용한 컴퓨팅 사고력 교육 모델에 대한 학습자의 인식 연구 vol.23, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.32431/kace.2020.23.2.005
  6. An alternative approach for measuring computational thinking: Performance-based platform vol.42, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100929