정보교육학회논문지 (Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education)

  • 제22권3호
  • /
  • Pages.297-305
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1229-3245(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-8428(eISSN)
한국정보교육학회 (Korea Association of Information Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

피지컬 컴퓨팅 기반의 인터랙티브 프로토타이핑 프로그래밍 학습모형 개발 및 적용

Development and Application of Interactive Prototyping Programming Learning Model based on Physical Computing

  • 투고 : 2018.04.19
  • 심사 : 2018.06.23
  • 발행 : 2018.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

피지컬 컴퓨팅은 컴퓨팅을 인간과 환경, 사물의 영역으로 확장한 개념으로 하드웨어와 소프트웨어 통합한 물리적 산출물 기반의 프로그래밍 학습매체로 주목받고 있다. 본 연구에서는 기술적 자유도가 높은 피지컬 컴퓨팅의 특징을 활용한 인터랙티브 프로토타이핑 기반의 프로그래밍 학습 모형을 개발하고 실험연구를 통해 학습 효과를 분석하였다. 실험처치 효과 검증을 위해 초등학교 5학년 59명 학습자를 대상으로 실험집단과 통제집단으로 구성하고 실험집단에는 인터랙티브 프로토타이핑 프로그래밍 학습모형을 적용하고 통제집단에는 선형순차 프로그래밍 학습모형을 적용하였다. 실험처치 전 후 정보과학 창의적 성향 검사를 실시하였고 두 집단의 사전검사 점수를 공변량으로 처리한 공분산분석(ANCOVA) 결과 유의수준 .05에서 학습 효과가 있음을 증명하였다. 이를 통해 초등학교 5학년 학습자를 대상으로 피지컬 컴퓨팅 기반의 인터랙티브 프로토타이핑 프로그래밍 학습모형의 프로그래밍 학습에 적용 가능성을 시사한다.

Physical computing is the concept of expanding computing to humans, environments, and objects. It draws attention as a programming learning medium based on physical outputs in integration of hardware and software. This study developed a programming learning model based on interactive prototyping using the characteristics of physical computing with a high degree of technical freedom and analyzed its learning effect in an experiment. To examine the effect of the experimental treatment, this researcher divided fifty nine 5th-grade elementary students into an experimental group and into a control group. the interactive prototyping programming learning model was applied to the experimental group, and a linear sequential programming learning model was applied to the control group. Information Science Creative Personality Test was conducted before and after the experimental treatment. Analysis of Covariance was conducted with the pre-test scores of the two groups. As a result, it was proved that there was the effect of learning at the significance level of .05. It indicates that the physical computing based interactive prototyping programming learning model is applicable to the programming learning for 5th-grade elementary students.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Jin Young Hak (2012). Development of Information Science Creative Personality Inventory . Korea National University of Education [master's thesis].
  2. Kim Do Young (2018). Prototyping-based Architectural Design Process Using Digital and Physical Models. SKKU University [master's thesis].
  3. Kim Hae Jin & Seo Jeong Hyun & Kim Young Sik (2016). The Effect of Scratch Programming Education Using Arduino on Middle School Students' Creative Problem Solving Ability. Journal of Korean Association for Learner-centered Curriculum and Instruction, 16(12), 707-724.
  4. Lee Ji Youn (2017). A study on the effect of prototyping on creativity in design process: focused on science high school students. Hongik University [master's thesis].
  5. Lee Tae Il (2008). Factors of Interactive Prototyping for Creative Interaction Design. Journal of Korean Society of Design Science, 23(5), 27-36.
  6. Lee Young Jae & Jeon Hyung Gi & Kim Young Sik (2017). Development and Applyment Selection Standards of Physical Computing Teaching Aids for Elementary SW Education According to The 2015 Revised Curriculum. Journal of Korean Association of Information Education, 21(4), 437-450. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2017.21.4.437
  7. Seo Jeong Hyun (2016). Development and application of educational contents for software education based on the integrative production for increasing the IT competence of elementary students. Journal of Korean Association of Information Education, 20(4), 357-366.
  8. Seon Jeong Hyun (2017). Development and Application of Teaching-learning Strategies Using Physical Computing with Structured Reflective Journal and Feedback in Problem-based Learning. Korea National University of Education [master's thesis].
  9. Ministry of Education (2015). Particulars of 2015 Revised Curriculum : Practical arts(Technology, Home Life).
  10. Ministry of Education (2015). Software education management guidelines.
  11. Gibson, I., Gao, Z., & Campbell, I. (2004). A comparative study of virtual prototyping and physical prototyping. International Journal of manufacturing technology and management, 6(6), 503-522. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMTM.2004.005931
  12. Hartmann, B., Klemmer, S. R., Bernstein, M., Abdulla, L., Burr, B., Robinson-Mosher, A., & Gee, J. (2006). Reflective physical prototyping through integrated design, test, and analysis. In Proceedings of the 19th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology (pp. 299-308). ACM.
  13. Katterfeldt, E. S., Dittert, N., & Schelhowe, H. (2015). Designing digital fabrication learning environments for Bildung: Implications from ten years of physical computing workshops. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 5, 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2015.08.001
  14. O'Sullivan, D., & Igoe, T. (2004). Physical computing: sensing and controlling the physical world with computers. Course Technology Press.
  15. Przybylla, M., & Romeike, R. (2015). Key Competences with Physical Computing. KEYCIT 2014: key competencies in informatics and ICT, 7, 351.
  16. Stankovic, J. A., Lee, I., Mok, A., & Rajkumar, R. (2005). Opportunities and obligations for physical computing systems. Computer, 38(11), 23-31. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2005.386
  17. Ulrich, K. T. (2003). Product design and development. Tata McGraw-Hill Education.
  18. Youmans, R. J. (2011). The effects of physical prototyping and group work on the reduction of design fixation. Journal of Design Studies, 32(2), 115-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2010.08.001