Structural Engineering and Mechanics

  • 제66권6호
  • /
  • Pages.677-691
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1225-4568(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6217(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Structural reliability assessment using an enhanced adaptive Kriging method

  • Vahedi, Jafar (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Sistan and Baluchestan) ;
  • Ghasemi, Mohammad Reza (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Sistan and Baluchestan) ;
  • Miri, Mahmoud (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Sistan and Baluchestan)
  • 투고 : 2017.11.28
  • 심사 : 2018.03.23
  • 발행 : 2018.06.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Reliability assessment of complex structures using simulation methods is time-consuming. Thus, surrogate models are usually employed to reduce computational cost. AK-MCS is a surrogate-based Active learning method combining Kriging and Monte-Carlo Simulation for structural reliability analysis. This paper proposes three modifications of the AK-MCS method to reduce the number of calls to the performance function. The first modification is related to the definition of an initial Design of Experiments (DoE). In the original AK-MCS method, an initial DoE is created by a random selection of samples among the Monte Carlo population. Therefore, samples in the failure region have fewer chances to be selected, because a small number of samples are usually located in the failure region compared to the safe region. The proposed method in this paper is based on a uniform selection of samples in the predefined domain, so more samples may be selected from the failure region. Another important parameter in the AK-MCS method is the size of the initial DoE. The algorithm may not predict the exact limit state surface with an insufficient number of initial samples. Thus, the second modification of the AK-MCS method is proposed to overcome this problem. The third modification is relevant to the type of regression trend in the AK-MCS method. The original AK-MCS method uses an ordinary Kriging model, so the regression part of Kriging model is an unknown constant value. In this paper, the effect of regression trend in the AK-MCS method is investigated for a benchmark problem, and it is shown that the appropriate choice of regression type could reduce the number of calls to the performance function. A stepwise approach is also presented to select a suitable trend of the Kriging model. The numerical results show the effectiveness of the proposed modifications.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Au, S. and Beck, J.L. (2001), "Estimation of small failure probabilities in high dimensions by subset simulation", Probabil. Eng. Mech., 16(4), 263-277. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-8920(01)00019-4
  2. Basudhar, A. (2012), "Computational optimal design and uncertainty quantification of complex systems using explicit decision boundaries", Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Arizona, U.S.A.
  3. Basudhar, A. and Missoum, S. (2008), "Adaptive explicit decision functions for probabilistic design and optimization using support vector machines", Comput. Struct., 86(19-20), 1904-1917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruc.2008.02.008
  4. Bichon, B.J., Eldred, M.S., Swiler, L.P., Mahadevan, S. and McFarland, J.M. (2008), "Efficient global reliability analysis for nonlinear implicit performance functions", AIAA J., 46(10), 2459-2468. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.34321
  5. Bourinet, J., Deheeger, F. and Lemaire, M. (2011), "Assessing small failure probabilities by combined subset simulation and support vector machines", Struct. Saf., 33(6), 343-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.06.001
  6. Bucher, C. and Most, T. (2008), "A comparison of approximate response functions in structural reliability analysis", Prob. Eng. Mech., 23(2-3), 154-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2007.12.022
  7. Butler, N. (2001), "Optimal and orthogonal Latin hypercube designs for computer experiments", Biometrika, 88(3), 847-857. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/88.3.847
  8. Cardoso, J.B., De Almeida, J.R., Dias, J.M. and Coelho, P.G. (2008), "Structural reliability analysis using Monte Carlo simulation and neural networks", Adv. Eng. Softw., 39(6), 505-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2007.03.015
  9. Cheng, J. and Xiao, R. (2005), "Serviceability reliability analysis of cable-stayed bridges", Struct. Eng. Mech., 20(6), 609-630. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2005.20.6.609
  10. Dizangian, B. and Ghasemi, M.R. (2016), "An efficient method for reliable optimum design of trusses", Steel Compos. Struct., 21(5), 1069-1084. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.21.5.1069
  11. Echard, B., Gayton, N. and Lemaire, M. (2011), "AK-MCS : An active learning reliability method combining Kriging and Monte Carlo simulation", Struct. Saf., 33(2), 145-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2011.01.002
  12. Engelund, S. and Rackwitz, R. (1993), "A benchmark study on importance sampling techniques in structural reliability", Struct. Saf., 12(4), 255-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4730(93)90056-7
  13. Fang, Y. and Tee, K.F. (2017), "Structural reliability analysis using response surface method with improved genetic algorithm", Struct. Eng. Mech., 62(2), 139-142. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.62.2.139
  14. Gaspar, B., Teixeira, A.P. and Soares, C.G. (2017), "Adaptive surrogate model with active refinement combining Kriging and a trust region method", Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 165, 277-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.03.035
  15. Hartigan, J.A. and Wong, M.A. (1979), "Algorithm AS 136: A K-means clustering algorithm", Appl. Stat., 28(1), 100. https://doi.org/10.2307/2346830
  16. Hurtado, J.E. and Alvarez, D.A. (2003), "Classification approach for reliability analysis with stochastic finite-element modeling", J. Struct. Eng., 129(8), 1141-1149. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:8(1141)
  17. Jones, D.R., Schonlau, M. and William, J. (1998), "Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions", J. Glob. Optim., 13(4), 455-492. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008306431147
  18. Kaymaz, I. (2005), "Application of kriging method to structural reliability problems", Struct. Saf., 27(2), 133-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2004.09.001
  19. Krige, D.G. (1951), "A statistical approach to some basic mine problems on the Witwatersrand", J. Chem. Met. Min. Soc. South Afr., 52(6), 119-139.
  20. Lelievre, N., Beaurepaire, P., Mattrand, C. and Gayton, N. (2018), "AK-MCSi : A Kriging-based method to deal with small failure probabilities and time-consuming models", Struct. Saf., 73, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2018.01.002
  21. Lemaire, M. (2009), Structural Reliability, ISTE Wiley.
  22. Lophaven, S.N., Sondergaard, J. and Nielsen, H.B. (2002), DACE A Matlab Kriging Toolbox, IMM Informatiocs Math. Model.
  23. Lv, Z., Lu, Z. and Wang, P. (2015), "A new learning function for Kriging and its applications to solve reliability problems in engineering", Comput. Math. Appl., 70(5), 1182-1197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2015.07.004
  24. Madsen H.O., Krenk S. and Lind N.C. (1986), Methods of Structural Safety, Englewood Cliffs (N.J.), Prentice-Hall.
  25. Melchers, R.E. (1994), "Structural system reliability assessment using directional simulation", Struct. Saf., 16(1-2), 23-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4730(94)00026-M
  26. Melchers, R.E. (1999), Structural Reliability Analysis and Prediction, John Wiley & Sons, U.K.
  27. Pan, Q. and Dias, D. (2017), "An efficient reliability method combining adaptive support vector machine and Monte Carlo simulation" Struct. Saf., 67, 85-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.04.006
  28. Rajashekhar, M.R. and Ellingwood, B.R. (1993), "A new look at the response surface approach for reliability analysis", Struct. Saf., 12(3), 205-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4730(93)90003-J
  29. Rashki, M., Miri, M. and Azhdary Moghaddam, M. (2012), "A new efficient simulation method to approximate the probability of failure and most probable point", Struct. Saf., 39, 22-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2012.06.003
  30. Romero, V.J., Burkardt, J.V., Gunzburger, M.D. and Peterson, J.S. (2006), "Comparison of pure and 'Latinized' centroidal Voronoi tessellation against various other statistical sampling methods", Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 91(10-11), 1266-1280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2005.11.023
  31. Sacks, J., Welch, W.J., Mitchell, J.S.B. and Henry, P.W. (1989), "Design and experiments of computer experiments", Stat. Sci., 4(4), 409-423. https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177012413
  32. Schobi, R., Sudret, B. and Marelli, S. (2016), "Rare event estimation using polynomial-chaos Kriging", ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertain. Eng. Syst. Part A Civil Eng., D4016002.
  33. Schueremans, L. and Van Gemert, D. (2005), "Benefit of splines and neural networks in simulation-based structural reliability analysis", Struct. Saf., 27(3), 246-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2004.11.001
  34. Shao, S. and Murotsu, Y. (1997), "Structural reliability analysis using a neural network", JSME Int. J., 40(3), 242-246. https://doi.org/10.1299/jsmea.40.242
  35. Sun, Z., Wang, J., Li, R. and Tong, C. (2017), "LIF: A new Kriging based learning function and its application to structural reliability analysis", Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 157, 152-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.09.003
  36. Vapnik, V.N. (1998), Statistical Learning Theory, Wiley, New York, U.S.A.
  37. Waarts, P.H. (2000), "Structural reliability using finite element methods: An appraisal of DARS: Directional adaptive response surface sampling", Ph.D. Dissertation, Technical University of Delft, the Netherlands.

피인용 문헌

  1. Decomposable polynomial response surface method and its adaptive order revision around most probable point vol.76, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2020.76.6.675
  2. An efficient reliability analysis strategy for low failure probability problems vol.78, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2021.78.2.209