DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Intra-organizational Conflict and Innovative Performance in Media Industry: An Exploratory Simulation Study

  • Received : 2017.11.10
  • Accepted : 2018.04.08
  • Published : 2018.04.30

Abstract

Media industry is attempting various types of strategic innovation in the content and organization as they enter transition period. However, previous research has casually treated the organizational culture from the management and realized that cognitive/cultural differences between the specific departments yield conflicts. This means the researchers explored less on the decision-making process with the conflict between sub-groups and constituent in the organization. Our study reviewed the most positive method to achieve the innovation outcome through the conflict management within the organization based on the behavioral theory of the firm and applied computer simulation model for analysis to construct the quantitative scenario and infer the result. Conflict always found while media organization experiences innovation within the groups. However, in the long term, securing the independence through the certain state of 'anarchy' which possibly lead consensus implies significance rather to comprise collegiate system for unilateral control. In specific, this study explored the issues in 'conflict management' that has been evaded in media organization research through NK simulation model.

Keywords

References

  1. P. Napoli, "Audience evolution: New technologies and the transformation of media audiences," Columbia University Press, pp. 25-174, 2011.
  2. S. Cottle, "Media organization and production," Sage, Eds, pp. 25-187, 2003.
  3. N. Olivera & F. Luminareau, "How coordination trajectories influence the performance of interorganizational project networks," Organization Science, 28, 6, pp. 1029-1060, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1151
  4. F. Lumineau, & N. Oliveira, "A pluralistic perspective to overcome major blind spots in research on interorganizational relationships," Academy of Management Annals, 12, 1, pp. 440-465, 2018. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0033
  5. M. D. Cohen, "Conflict and complexity: Goal diversity and organizational search effectiveness," American Political Science Review, 78, 2, pp. 435-451, 1984. https://doi.org/10.2307/1963374
  6. P. M. Napoli, "Foundations of communication policy: Principles and process in the regulation of electronic media," Hampton Press, 2001.
  7. S. A. Lafsky, "The progress of women and people of color in the US journalistic workforce : A long, slow journey," Women in Mass Communication, 2, pp. 87-103, 1993.
  8. B. B. Cook. & S. R. Banks, "Predictions of job burnout in reporters and copy editors," Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 70, 1, pp. 108-117, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769909307000112
  9. A. Alexander, J. E. Owers, R. Carveth, C. A. Hollifield, and A. N. Greco, "Media economics: Theory and practice," Routledge, Eds, 2003.
  10. G. Gavetti & D. Levinthal, "Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search," Administrative science quarterly, 45, 1, pp. 113-137, 2000. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666981
  11. N. Hu, W. Jianlin, and G. Jibao, "Cultural intelligence and employees' creative performance: The moderating role of team conflict in interorganizational teams," Journal of Management & Organization, pp. 1-21, 2017.
  12. D. Croteau, & W. Hoynes, "The business of media: Corporate media and the public interest," Pine forge press, 2006.
  13. R. M. Cyert & J. G. March, "A behavioral theory of the firm." Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 2, pp. 169-187, 1963.
  14. C. Adami, "What is complexity?," BioEssays, 24, 12, pp. 1085-1094, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.10192
  15. S. Balachandan, & E. Hernandez, "Networks and innovation: Accounting for structural and institutional sources of recombination in brokerage triads," Organization Science, 2018.
  16. S. Paruchuri, & S. Awate, "Organizational knowledge networks and local search: The role of intraorganizational inventor networks," Strategic Management Journal, 38, 3 pp. 657-675, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2516
  17. S. K. Ethiraj, D. Levinthal. and R. R. Roy, "The dual role of modularity: Innovation and imitation," Management Science, 54, 5, pp. 939-955, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0775
  18. S. K. Ethiraj & D. Levinthal, "Hoping for A to Z while rewarding only A: Complex organizations and multiple goals," Organization Science, 20, 1, pp. 4-21, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0358
  19. M. T. Hannan & J. Freeman, "Structural inertia and organizational change," American sociological review, 49, 2, pp.149-164, 1984. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095567
  20. R. Florida, "Cities and the creative class," Routledge, 2005.
  21. S. Kauffman, J. Lobo, and W. Macready, "Optimal search on a technology landscape," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 43, 2, pp. 141-166, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(00)00114-1
  22. S. Kauffman. & W. Macready, "Technological evolution and adaptive organizations: ideas from biology may find applications in economics". Complexity, 1, 2, pp. 26-43, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1002/cplx.6130010208
  23. S. Kaufmann, "The origins of order," Oxford University Press, New York, 1993.
  24. F. H. Westhoff, B. V. Yarbrough, and R. M. Yarbrough, "Complexity, organization, and Stuart Kauffman's the origins of order," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 29, 1, pp. 1-25, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(95)00049-6
  25. D. Levinthal, & J. G. March, "A model of adaptive organizational search," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2, 4, pp. 307-333, 1981. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(81)90012-3
  26. C. C. Miller, L. M. Burke. and W. H. Glick, "Cognitive diversity among upper-echelon executives: Implications for strategic decision processes," Strategic Management Journal, 19, 1, pp. 39-58, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199801)19:1<39::AID-SMJ932>3.0.CO;2-A
  27. P. Auerswald, S. Kauffman, J. Lobo. and K. Shell, "The production recipes approach to modeling technological innovation: An application to learning by doing," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 24, 3, pp. 389-450, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1889(98)00091-8
  28. P. Brandes, R. Dharwadkar, and S. Suh. "I know something you don't know!: The role of linking pin directors in monitoring and incentive alignment," Strategic Management Journal, 37, 5, pp. 964-981, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2353
  29. D. Levinthal, & J. G. March, "The myopia of learning," Strategic management journal, 14, 2, pp. 95-112, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141009
  30. M. L. Tushman, & C. A. O'Reilly III, "Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change," California Management Review, 38, 4, pp. 8-29, 1996. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165852
  31. D. Kim, "Media Governance in Korea 1980-2017," Springer, 2018.