Earthquakes and Structures

  • 제14권6호
  • /
  • Pages.615-626
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2092-7614(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-7622(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic risk estimation of the Kirikkale province through street survey based rapid assessment method (SSRA)

  • Sonmezer, Yetis Bulent (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Kirikkale University) ;
  • Bas, Selcuk (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Bartin University) ;
  • Akbas, Sami Oguzhan (Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Gazi University)
  • 투고 : 2018.02.08
  • 심사 : 2018.05.08
  • 발행 : 2018.06.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The seismic vulnerability of Turkey is relatively high due to its active fault systems with potential to create destructive earthquakes. Thus, reducing the loss of life and property, the number of the earthquake-prone buildings and their retrofit requirements are considerably significant key issues under the scenario earthquakes. The street survey based rapid assessment (SSRA) method can be considered as a powerful tool to determine the seismic vulnerability of building stock of an earthquake-prone city/state. In this study, the seismic vulnerability of the building stock of the Kirikkale province in Turkey is aimed to be estimated adopting the street survey based rapid assessment method (SSRA). For this purpose, central 2074 existing reinforced concrete (R/C) buildings were structurally surveyed with rapid visual site screening and disadvantages such as, the existence of short-column, soft-story, heavy overhangs, pounding effect and local soil conditions were determined for obtaining the structural performance score of each. The results obtained from the study demonstrate that 11-25% of the surveyed buildings in the study region needs to be investigated through more advanced assessment methods. Besides, higher correlation between increasing story number and unsafe/safe building ratio is obtained for the buildings with soft-story parameter than that for those with heavy overhangs and short-column parameters. The conformity of the results of the current study with the previous documented cases of rapid assessment efforts in the recent earthquakes in Turkey shows that the SSRA method for the Kirikkale province performed well, and thus this methodology can be reliably used for similar settlement areas.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abrahamson, N., Silva, W. and Kamai, R. (2013), "Update of the AS08 ground-motion prediction equations based on the NGAWest2 data set", Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER), University of California, Berkeley, California.
  2. Ajay Kumar, S., Rajaram, C., Mishra, S., Pradeep Kumar, R. and Karnath, A. (2017), "Rapid visual screening of different housing typologies in Himachal Pradesh, India", Nat. Hazard., 85(3), 1851-1875. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2668-3
  3. Al-Nimry, H., Resheidat, M. and Qeran, S. (2015), "Rapid assessment for seismic vulnerability of low and medium rise infilled RC frame buildings", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 14(2), 275-293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-015-0023-4
  4. Albayrak, U., Canbaz, M. and Albayrak, G. (2015), "A Rapid Seismic Risk Assessment Method for Existing Building Stock in Urban Areas", Procedia Eng., 118, 1242-1249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.476
  5. Anagnostopoulos, S.A. and Spiliopoulos, K.V. (1992), "An investigation of earthquake induced pounding between adjacent buildings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 21(4), 289-302. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290210402
  6. ATC-40 (1996), Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, Applied Technology Council, Washington D.C.
  7. Binici, F. (2013), "Seismicity of Turkey and the provisions of legislation and financial policy challenging the urban transformation in Turkey in terms of building stock", Hatay, Turkey.
  8. Boore, D., Stewart, J., Emel, S. and Atkinson, G. (2013), "NGAWest2 equations for predicting response spectral accelerations for shallow crustal earthquakes", Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER), University of California, Berkeley, California.
  9. Campbell, K. and Bozorgnia, Y. (2013), "NGA-West2 campbell-Bozorgnia ground motion model for the horizontal components of PGA, PGV, and 5%-Damped elastic Pseudo-Acceleration response spectra for periods ranging from 0.01 to 10 s", Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER), University of California, Berkeley, California.
  10. Darandeli, M.B. (2001), "Development of a new family of normalized modulus reduction and material damping curves", PhD Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin, TX, USA.
  11. DolSEk, M. and Fajfar, P. (2001), "Soft storey effects in uniformly infilled reinforced concrete frames", J. Earthq. Eng., 5(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460109350383
  12. EC8 (2004), Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance Part 3: Strengthening and Repair of Buildings, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels.
  13. FEMA-310 (1998), Handbook for the Seismic Evaluation of Buildings -A Pre-standar, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington D.C.
  14. FEMA-356 (2000), Pre-standard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington D.C.
  15. GeoMotions-LLC (2017), A Computer Program for Equivalent-Linear Site Response Analysis, Washington, U.S.A.
  16. Gross, J.L. and Phan, L.T. (2000), "Implications for earthquake risk reduction in the united states from the Kocaeli, Turkey, earthquake of August 17, 1999", ASCE World Structural Engineering Conference.
  17. Guevara, L.T. and Garci'a, L.E. (2005), "The captive- and shortcolumn effects", Earthq. Spectra, 21(1), 141-160. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1856533
  18. Gutenberg, B. and Richter, C. (1956), "Earthquake magnitude, intensity, energy, and acceleration", Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 46, 105-145.
  19. Hassan, A.F. and Sozen, M.A. (1997), "Seismic vulnerability assessment of low-rise buildings in regions with infrequent earthquakes", ACI Struct. J., 94(1), 31-39.
  20. Ilki, A., Comert, M., Demir, C., Orakcal, K., Ulugtekin, D., Tapan, M. and Kumbasar, N. (2014), "Performance based rapid seismic assessment method (PERA) for reinforced concrete frame buildings", Adv. Struct. Eng., 17(3), 439-459. https://doi.org/10.1260/1369-4332.17.3.439
  21. Iyisan, R. (1996), "Zeminlerde kayma dalgasi hizi ile penetrasyon deney sonuclari arasindaki bagintilar", İMO Teknik Dergi, 7(32), 1187-1199.
  22. Jain, S.K., Mitra, K., Kumar, M. and Shah, M. (2010), "A proposed rapid visual screening procedure for seismic evaluation of rc-frame buildings in India", Earthq. Spectra, 26(3), 709-729. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3456711
  23. Kocyigit, A. (2008), "Ankara's earthquake and source of 2005- 2007 Afsar (Bala-Ankara) Earthquakes", MTA Natural Resources and Economy Bulletin, 1-7.
  24. Ozcebe, G., Sucuoglu, H., Yucemen, M.S., Yakut, A. and Kubin, J. (2006), "Seismic risk assessment of existing building stock in İstanbul: a pilot application in Zeytinburnu district", San Fransisco, CA, USA.
  25. Ozcebe, G., Yucemen, M.S., Aydogan, V. and Yakut, A. (2003), Preliminary Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings in Turkey, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht.
  26. O zhendekci, N. and O zhendekci, D. (2012), "Rapid seismic vulnerability assessment of low- to mid-rise reinforced concrete buildings using Bingöl's regional data", Earthq. Spectra, 28(3), 1165-1187. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000065
  27. Palanci, M. and Senel, S.M. (2013), "Rapid seismic performance assessment method for one story hinged precast buildings", Struct. Eng. Mech., 48(2), 257-274. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2013.48.2.257
  28. Perrone, D., Aiello, M.A., Pecce, M. and Rossi, F. (2015), "Rapid visual screening for seismic evaluation of RC hospital buildings", Struct., 3, 57-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2015.03.002
  29. Polat, G. and Mete, A.S. (1999), "Procedure for determining seismic vulnerability of building structures", ACI Struct. J., 96(3), 336-342.
  30. Sucuoglu, H. (2007), "A screening procedure for seismic riisk assessment in urban building stocks", Turkish Camber of Civil Engineers, Istanbul, Turkey.
  31. Sucuoglu, H. and Yazgan, U. (2003), "Simple survey procedures for seismic risk assessment in: urban building stocks, seismic assessment and rehabilitation of existing buildings", NATO Sci. Ser. IV, 29 97-118
  32. Sucuoglu, H. and Yazgan, U. (2003), Simple Survey Procedures for Seismic Risk Assessment in Urban Building Stocks, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht.
  33. Sucuoglu, H., Gür, T. and Günay, M.S. (2004), "Performancebased seismic rehabilitation of damaged reinforced concrete buildings", J. Struct. Eng., 130(10), 1475-1486. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:10(1475)
  34. Walsh, K.Q., Cummuskey, P.A., Jafarzadeh, R. and Ingham, J.M. (2017), "Rapid identification and taxonomical classification of structural seismic attributes in a region wide commercial building stock", J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 31(1), 04016067. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000927
  35. Yakut, A., Aydogan, V., Ozcebe, G. and Yucemen, M.S. (2003), Preliminary Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings in Turkey, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht.