DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Community-Based Policies and Support for Free Drinking Water Access in Outdoor Areas and Building Standards in U.S. Municipalities

  • Park, Sohyun (Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity and Obesity, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) ;
  • Onufrak, Stephen (Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity and Obesity, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) ;
  • Wilking, Cara ;
  • Cradock, Angie (Prevention Research Center on Nutrition and Physical Activity, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Landmark Center)
  • Received : 2018.03.08
  • Accepted : 2018.03.11
  • Published : 2018.04.30

Abstract

We examined community-level characteristics associated with free drinking water access policies in U.S. municipalities using data from a nationally representative survey of city managers/officials from 2,029 local governments in 2014. Outcomes were 4 free drinking water access policies. Explanatory measures were population size, rural/urban status, census region, poverty prevalence, education, and racial/ethnic composition. We used multivariable logistic regression to test differences and presented only significant findings. Many (56.3%) local governments had at least one community plan with a written objective to provide free drinking water in outdoor areas; municipalities in the Northeast and South regions and municipalities with ${\leq}50%$ of non-Hispanic whites were less likely and municipalities with larger population size were more likely to have a plan. About 59% had polices/budget provisions for free drinking water in parks/outdoor recreation areas; municipalities in the Northeast and South regions were less likely and municipalities with larger population size were more likely to have it. Only 9.3% provided development incentives for placing drinking fountains in outdoor, publicly accessible areas; municipalities with larger population size were more likely to have it. Only 7.7% had a municipal plumbing code with a drinking fountain standard that differed from the statewide plumbing code; municipalities with a lower proportion of non-Hispanic whites were more likely to have it. In conclusion, over half of municipalities had written plans or a provision for providing free drinking water in parks, but providing development incentives or having a local plumbing code provision were rare.

Keywords

References

  1. Institute of Medicine (US). Dietary reference intakes for water, potassium, sodium, chloride, and sulfate. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press; 2005.
  2. Manz F. Hydration and disease. J Am Coll Nutr 2007;26:535S-541S. https://doi.org/10.1080/07315724.2007.10719655
  3. Popkin B, D'Anci K, Rosenberg I. Water, hydration, and health. Nutr Rev 2010;68:439-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.2010.00304.x
  4. Muckelbauer R, Sarganas G, Gruneis A, Muller-Nordhorn J. Association between water consumption and body weight outcomes: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr 2013;98:282-99. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.112.055061
  5. Wang YC, Ludwig DS, Sonneville K, Gortmaker SL. Impact of change in sweetened caloric beverage consumption on energy intake among children and adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2009;163:336-43. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.23
  6. Tate DF, Turner-McGrievy G, Lyons E, Stevens J, Erickson K, Polzien K, Diamond M, Wang X, Popkin B. Replacing caloric beverages with water or diet beverages for weight loss in adults: main results of the Choose Healthy Options Consciously Everyday (CHOICE) randomized clinical trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2012;95:555-63. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.111.026278
  7. Bogart LM, Babey SH, Patel AI, Wang P, Schuster MA. Lunchtime school water availability and water consumption among California adolescents. J Adolesc Health 2016;58:98-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.09.007
  8. Park S, Sherry B, Wethington H, Pan L. Use of parks or playgrounds: reported access to drinking water fountains among US adults, 2009. J Public Health (Oxf) 2012;34:65-72. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdr047
  9. Cradock AL, Kenney EL, McHugh A, Conley L, Mozaffarian RS, Reiner JF, Gortmaker SL. Evaluating the impact of the Healthy Beverage Executive Order for city agencies in Boston, Massachusetts, 2011-2013. Prev Chronic Dis 2015;12:E147.
  10. Long MW, Gortmaker SL, Patel AI, Onufrak SJ, Wilking CL, Cradock AL. Public perception of quality and support for required access to drinking water in schools and parks. Am J Health Promot 2018;32:72-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890117116671253
  11. American Planning Association. Comprehensive planning for public health: results of the planning and community health research center survey [Internet]. Available from https://planning-org-uploaded-media.s3.amazonaws.com/legacy_resources/research/publichealth/pdf/surveyreport.pdf [cited 2017 February 10] 2011.
  12. Moore LV, Carlson SA, Onufrak S, Carroll DD, Galuska D. Development and implementation of a local government survey to measure community supports for healthy eating and active living. Prev Med Rep 2017;6:74-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.02.005
  13. United States Census Bureau. 2007 Census of governments [Internet]. Available from https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/cog/data/tables.html [cited 2017 February 10]. 2009.
  14. Onufrak SJ, Park S, Wilking C. Student-reported school drinking fountain availability by youth characteristics and state plumbing codes. Prev Chronic Dis 2014;11:E60.
  15. Kushner N. Quenching community thirst: planning for more access to drinking water in public places [Internet]. Available from https://planning-org-uploaded-media.s3.amazonaws.com/legacy_resources/research/publichealth/pdf/wateraccessreport.pdf [cited 2017 February 10]. 2013.
  16. United States Census Bureau. Download urban area relationship files [Internet]. Available from https://www.census.gov/geo/maps-data/data/ua_rel_download.html [cited 2017 February 10]. 2010.
  17. United States Department of Agriculture. Geography of poverty [Internet]. Available from https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/rural-economy-population/rural-poverty-well-being/geography-of-poverty.aspx [cited 2017 February 10]. 2015.
  18. Park S, McGuire LC, Galuska DA. Regional differences in sugar-sweetened beverage intake among US adults. J Acad Nutr Diet 2015;115:1996-2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2015.06.010
  19. Steinman L, Doescher M, Levinger D, Perry C, Carter L, Eyler A, Aytur S, Cradock AL, Evenson KR, Heinrich K, Kerr J, Litt J, Severcan Y, Voorhees C. Master plans for pedestrian and bicycle transportation: community characteristics. J Phys Act Health 2010;7 Suppl 1:S60-6. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.7.s1.s60
  20. Goodman AB, Blanck HM, Sherry B, Park S, Nebeling L, Yaroch AL. Behaviors and attitudes associated with low drinking water intake among US adults, Food Attitudes and Behaviors Survey, 2007. Prev Chronic Dis 2013;10:E51.
  21. Brooks CJ, Gortmaker SL, Long MW, Cradock AL, Kenney EL. Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in hydration status among US adults and the role of tap water and other beverage intake. Am J Public Health 2017;107:1387-94. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2017.303923
  22. Millard-Ball A. The limits to planning: causal impacts of city climate action plans. J Plan Educ Res 2013;33:5-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X12449742