DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Screening and Evaluation of Yeast Antagonists for Biological Control of Botrytis cinerea on Strawberry Fruits

  • Chen, Pei-Hua (Department of Biology, National Changhua University of Education) ;
  • Chen, Rou-Yun (Department of Biology, National Changhua University of Education) ;
  • Chou, Jui-Yu (Department of Biology, National Changhua University of Education)
  • Received : 2018.01.03
  • Accepted : 2018.02.26
  • Published : 2018.03.31

Abstract

Gray mold (Botrytis cinerea) is one of the most common diseases of strawberries (Fragaria${\times}$ananassa Duchesne) worldwide. Although many chemical fungicides are used for controlling the growth of B. cinerea, the risk of the fungus developing chemical resistance together with consumer demand for reducing the use of chemical fungicides have necessitated an alternative method to control this pathogen. Various naturally occurring microbes aggressively attack plant pathogens and benefit plants by suppressing diseases; these microbes are referred to as biocontrol agents. However, screening of potent biocontrol agents is essential for their further development and commercialization. In this study, 24 strains of yeast with antagonistic ability against gray mold were isolated, and the antifungal activity of the volatile and diffusible metabolites was evaluated. Putative mechanisms of action associated with the biocontrol capacity of yeast strains against B. cinerea were studied through in vitro and in vivo assays. The volatile organic compounds produced by the Galactomyces candidum JYC1146 could be useful in the biological control of plant pathogens and therefore are potential alternative fungicides with low environmental impact.

Keywords

References

  1. Giampieri F, Tulipani S, Alvarez-Suarez JM, et al. The strawberry: composition, nutritional quality, and impact on human health. Nutrition. 2012;28:9-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2011.08.009
  2. Giampieri F, Forbes-Hernandez TY, Gasparrini M, et al. Strawberry as a health promoter: an evidence based review. Food Funct. 2015;6:1386-1398. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5FO00147A
  3. Otles S, Ozgoz S. Health effects of dietary fiber. Acta Sci Pol Technol Aliment. 2014;13:191-202. https://doi.org/10.17306/J.AFS.2014.2.8
  4. Naidu KA. Vitamin C in human health and disease is still a mystery? An overview. Nutr J. 2003;2:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2891-2-7
  5. Tulipani S, Romandini S, Alvarez Suarez JM, et al. Folate content in different strawberry genotypes and folate status in healthy subjects after strawberry consumption. Biofactors. 2008;34:47-55. https://doi.org/10.1002/biof.5520340106
  6. Elad Y, Williamson B, Tudzynski P, Delen N. Botrytis spp. and diseases they cause in agricultural systems-an introduction. In: Elad Y, Williamson B, Tudzynski P, et al., editors. Botrytis: biology, pathology and control. The Netherlands: Springer; 2007. p. 1-8.
  7. Braun P, Sutton J. Infection cycles and population dynamics of Botrytis cinerea in strawberry leaves. Can J Plant Pathol. 1988;10:133-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060668809501745
  8. Xu X, Harris DC, Berrie AM. Modeling infection of strawberry flowers by Botrytis cinerea using field data. Phytopathology. 2000;90:1367-1374. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.2000.90.12.1367
  9. Xiao C, Chandler C, Price J, et al. Comparison of epidemics of Botrytis fruit rot and powdery mildew of strawberry in large plastic tunnel and field production systems. Plant Disease. 2001;85:901-909. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2001.85.8.901
  10. Droby S, Lichter A. Post-harvest Botrytis infection: etiology, development and management. In: Elad Y, Williamson B, Tudzynski P, et al., editors. Botrytis: Biology, pathology and control. The Netherlands: Springer; 2007. p. 349-367.
  11. van Kan JA. Infection strategies of Botrytis cinerea. In: VIII International Symposium on Postharvest Physiology of Ornamental Plants; 2003. p. 77-90.
  12. Gourgues M, Brunet-Simon A, Lebrun MH, et al. The tetraspanin BcPls1 is required for appressorium-mediated penetration of Botrytis cinerea into host plant leaves. Mol Microbiol. 2004;51:619-629.
  13. Govrin EM, Levine A. The hypersensitive response facilitates plant infection by the necrotrophic pathogen Botrytis cinerea. Curr Biol. 2000;10:751-757. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00560-1
  14. Bezier A, Lambert B, Baillieul F. Study of defenserelated gene expression in grapevine leaves and berries infected with Botrytis cinerea. Eur J Plant Pathol. 2002;108:111-120. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015061108045
  15. Puhl I, Treutter D. Ontogenetic variation of catechin biosynthesis as basis for infection and quiescence of Botrytis cinerea in developing strawberry fruits. J Plant Dis Prot. 2008;115:247-251. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03356272
  16. Maas JL. Compendium of strawberry diseases. St. Paul (MN): APS press; 1998.
  17. Agrios GN. Plant Pathology. 5th ed. Department of Plant Pathology. University of Florida; 2005.
  18. Magnin-Robert M, Quantinet D, Couderchet M, et al. Differential induction of grapevine resistance and defense reactions against Botrytis cinerea by bacterial mixtures in vineyards. BioControl. 2013;58:117-131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-012-9474-y
  19. Spadaro D, Droby S. Development of biocontrol products for postharvest diseases of fruit: the importance of elucidating the mechanisms of action of yeast antagonists. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2016;47:39-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2015.11.003
  20. Huang R, Li G, Zhang J, et al. Control of postharvest Botrytis fruit rot of strawberry by volatile organic compounds of Candida intermedia. Phytopathology. 2011;101:859-869. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-09-10-0255
  21. Zhang H, Wang L, Dong Y, et al. Postharvest biological control of gray mold decay of strawberry with Rhodotorula glutinis. Biol Control. 2007;40:287-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2006.10.008
  22. Compant S, Duffy B, Nowak J, et al. Use of plant growth-promoting bacteria for biocontrol of plant diseases: principles, mechanisms of action, and future prospects. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71:4951-4959. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.71.9.4951-4959.2005
  23. Lopes MR, Klein MN, Ferraz LP, et al. Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a novel and efficient biological control agent for Colletotrichum acutatum during pre-harvest. Microbiol Res. 2015;175:93-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2015.04.003
  24. Agrawal T, Kotasthane AS. Chitinolytic assay of indigenous Trichoderma isolates collected from different geographical locations of Chhattisgarh in Central India. SpringerPlus. 2012;1:73. https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-1-73
  25. Dunne C, Crowley JJ, Mo€enne-Loccoz Y, et al. Biological control of Pythium ultimum by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia W81 is mediated by an extracellular proteolytic activity. Microbiology. 1997;143:3921-3931. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-143-12-3921
  26. Mangunwardoyo W, Aprilismulan A, Oetari A, Sjamsuridzal W. Screening cellulose activity of yeast isolated from soil, sediment and water river from Taman Nasional Gunung Halimun, West Java, Indonesia. Malays J Microbiol. 2011;7:e216.
  27. Vero S, Garmendia G, Gonzalez MB, et al. Evaluation of yeasts obtained from Antarctic soil samples as biocontrol agents for the management of postharvest diseases of apple (Malusdomestica). FEMS Yeast Res. 2013;13:189-199. https://doi.org/10.1111/1567-1364.12021
  28. Giobbe S, Marceddu S, Scherm B, et al. The strange case of a biofilm-forming strain of Pichia fermentans, which controls Monilinia brown rot on apple but is pathogenic on peach fruit. FEMS Yeast Res. 2007;7:1389-1398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1567-1364.2007.00301.x
  29. Kurtzman CP, Robnett CJ. Identification of clinically important ascomycetous yeasts based on nucleotide divergence in the 5' end of the largesubunit (26S) ribosomal DNA gene. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:1216-1223.
  30. Morgan W, Kamoun S. RXLR effectors of plant pathogenic oomycetes. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2007;10:332-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2007.04.005
  31. Fang XL, Phillips D, Li H, et al. Severity of crown and root diseases of strawberry and associated fungal and oomycete pathogens in Western Australia. Australasian Plant Pathol. 2011;40:109-119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13313-010-0019-5
  32. Golzar H, Phillips D, Mack S. Occurrence of strawberry root and crown rot in Western Australia. Austral Plant Disease Notes. 2007;2:145-147. https://doi.org/10.1071/DN07057
  33. Eikemo H, Klemsdal SS, Riisberg I, et al. Genetic variation between Phytophthora cactorum isolates differing in their ability to cause crown rot in strawberry. Mycol Res. 2004;108:317-324. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953756204009244
  34. Abad ZG, Abad JA, Coffey MD, et al. Phytophthora bisheria sp. nov., a new species identified in isolates from the Rosaceous raspberry, rose and strawberry in three continents. Mycologia. 2008;100:99-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/15572536.2008.11832502
  35. Parafati L, Vitale A, Restuccia C, et al. Biocontrol ability and action mechanism of food-isolated yeast strains against Botrytis cinerea causing post-harvest bunch rot of table grape. Food Microbiol. 2015;47:85-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2014.11.013
  36. Morath SU, Hung R, Bennett JW. Fungal volatile organic compounds: a review with emphasis on their biotechnological potential. Fungal Biol Rev. 2012;26:73-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbr.2012.07.001
  37. Chen H, Xiao X, Wang J, et al. Antagonistic effects of volatiles generated by Bacillus subtilis on spore germination and hyphal growth of the plant pathogen, Botrytis cinerea. Biotechnol Lett. 2008;30:919-923. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-007-9626-9
  38. Li Q, Ning P, Zheng L, et al. Effects of volatile substances of Streptomyces globisporus JK-1 on control of Botrytis cinerea on tomato fruit. Biol Control. 2012;61:113-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2011.10.014
  39. Ortiz-Castro R, Contreras-Cornejo HA, Macias-Rodriguez L, et al. The role of microbial signals in plant growth and development. Plant Signal Behav. 2009;4:701-712. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.4.8.9047
  40. Su HJ, Thseng FM, Chen JS, et al. Production of volatile substances by rhizomorphs of Marasmius crinisequi and its significance in nature. Fungal Divers. 2011;49:199-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13225-010-0084-7
  41. Etebarian H ZE, Sahebani N. Biological control of apple gray mold by mixtures of Bacillus Subtilis and yeast isolates. Afr J Food Sci. 2014;8:155-163. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJFS2013.1043
  42. Makower M, Bevan E. The inheritance of a killer character in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). In: Geerts SJ, editor. Genetics today: Proceedings of the XI international congress of genetics; 1963. p. 235-244.
  43. Santos A, Marquina D. Killer toxin of Pichia membranifaciens and its possible use as a biocontrol agent against grey mould disease of grapevine. Microbiology (Reading, Engl). 2004;150:2527-2534. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.27071-0
  44. Marquina D, Santos A, Peinado JM. Biology of killer yeasts. Int Microbiol. 2002;5:65-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10123-002-0066-z
  45. Chen PH, Chou JY. Screening and identification of yeasts antagonistic to pathogenic fungi show a narrow optimal pH range for antagonistic activity. Pol J Microbiol. 2017;66:101-106. https://doi.org/10.5604/17331331.1234997
  46. Backman P. Fungicide formulation: relationship to biological activity. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 1978;16:211-237. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.py.16.090178.001235
  47. Kim J, Lee SH, Kim CS, et al. Biological control of strawberry gray mold caused by Botrytis cinerea using Bacillus licheniformis N1 formulation. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;17:438-444.
  48. Frey-Klett P, Burlinson P, Deveau A, et al. Bacterial-fungal interactions: hyphens between agricultural, clinical, environmental, and food microbiologists. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2011;75:583-609. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00020-11
  49. Seneviratne G, Zavahir J, Bandara W, et al. Fungal-bacterial biofilms: their development for novel biotechnological applications. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;24:739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-007-9539-8
  50. Brown GE. Biology and control of Geotrichum candidum, the cause of citrus sour rot. Proc Flo State Hort Soc. 1984;92:186-189.
  51. Liti G, Carter DM, Moses AM, et al. Population genomics of domestic and wild yeasts. Nature. 2009;458:337-341. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07743
  52. Chou JY, Chen HW, Lin CC, et al. Yeast diversity associated with the biting midge Forcipomyia taiwana in Taiwan. Nova Hedw. 2015;101:519-527. https://doi.org/10.1127/nova_hedwigia/2015/0291

Cited by

  1. Scent of a Killer: Microbial Volatilome and Its Role in the Biological Control of Plant Pathogens vol.11, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00041
  2. Genome Sequence, Assembly, and Characterization of the Antagonistic Yeast Candida oleophila Used as a Biocontrol Agent Against Post-harvest Diseases vol.11, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00295
  3. Foliar application of endophytic Wickerhamomyces anomalus against grey mould in Eucalyptus dunnii vol.30, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2019.1687645
  4. Seed priming alleviates crop growth inhibition by salinity vol.458, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/458/1/012006
  5. Innovation of fruit coating with antifungal yeast to maintain the quality of postharvest strawberries vol.458, pp.None, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/458/1/012018
  6. Endophytic Fungi Isolated from Plants Growing in Central Andean Precordillera of Chile with Antifungal Activity against Botrytis cinerea vol.6, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/jof6030149
  7. Bioactivity of volatile organic compounds by Aureobasidium species against gray mold of tomato and table grape vol.36, pp.11, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-020-02947-7
  8. Insight into the Microbiological Control Strategies against Botrytis cinerea Using Systemic Plant Resistance Activation vol.10, pp.11, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10111822
  9. Aureobasidium pullulans volatilome identified by a novel, quantitative approach employing SPME-GC-MS, suppressed Botrytis cinerea and Alternaria alternata in vitro vol.10, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-61471-8
  10. From the vineyard to the cellar: new insights of Starmerella bacillaris (synonym Candida zemplinina) technological properties and genomic perspective vol.105, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-11041-9
  11. Strawberry FaWRKY25 Transcription Factor Negatively Regulated the Resistance of Strawberry Fruits to Botrytis cinerea vol.12, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12010056
  12. The Use of Interactions Between Microorganisms in Strawberry Cultivation (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) vol.12, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.780099
  13. Biological Control of Phytopathogenic Fungi by Kluyveromyces marxianus and Torulaspora delbrueckii Isolated from Iraqi Date Vinegar vol.15, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.22207/jpam.15.1.23
  14. Broad-Spectrum Activity of Volatile Organic Compounds from Three Yeast-like Fungi of the Galactomyces Genus Against Diverse Plant Pathogens vol.49, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/12298093.2020.1857042
  15. Cellulase-producing yeast isolated from fermented cocoa beans as biocontrol for pathogenic mold chocolate fruit collected from Sentul, Jawa Barat, Indonesia vol.1869, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1869/1/012043
  16. Application of indigenous honeybees in dispersing Trichoderma harzianum spores for control of the strawberry grey mould vol.31, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/09583157.2020.1865269
  17. Isolation and Characterization of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Yeasts from Typical Bulgarian Sourdoughs vol.9, pp.7, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9071346
  18. Mechanisms of Action of Microbial Biocontrol Agents against Botrytis cinerea vol.7, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7121045
  19. A Sustainable Alternative for Postharvest Disease Management and Phytopathogens Biocontrol in Fruit: Antagonistic Yeasts vol.10, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10122641
  20. Biosafe Management of Botrytis Grey Mold of Strawberry Fruit by Novel Bioagents vol.10, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10122737