Steel and Composite Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Performance based design optimum of CBFs using bee colony algorithm

  • Mansouri, Iman (Department of Civil Engineering, Birjand University of Technology) ;
  • Soori, Sanaz (Department of Civil Engineering, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman) ;
  • Amraie, Hamed (Islamic Azad University-Roudehen Branch) ;
  • Hu, Jong Wan (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Incheon National University) ;
  • Shahbazi, Shahrokh (TAAT Investment Group)
  • Received : 2017.08.18
  • Accepted : 2018.03.30
  • Published : 2018.06.10
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The requirement to safe and economical buildings caused to the exploitation of nonlinear capacity structures and optimization of them. This requirement leads to forming seismic design method based on performance. In this study, concentrically braced frames (CBFs) have been optimized at the immediate occupancy (IO) and collapse prevention (CP) levels. Minimizing structural weight is taken as objective function subjected to performance constraints on inter-story drift ratios at various performance levels. In order to evaluate the seismic capacity of the CBFs, pushover analysis is conducted, and the process of optimization has been done by using Bee Algorithm. Results indicate that performance based design caused to have minimum structural weight and due to increase capacity of CBFs.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport of Korean government

References

  1. AISC (2010), American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC), Prequalified Connections for Special and Intermediate Steel Moment Frames for Seismic Applications, Chicago, IL, USA.
  2. Artar, M. (2016a), "A comparative study on optimum design of multi-element truss structures", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 22(3), 521-535. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.22.3.521
  3. Artar, M. (2016b), "Optimum design of braced steel frames via teaching learning based optimization", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 22(4), 733-744. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.22.4.733
  4. ATC40 (1996), ATC-40 Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings, Applied Technology Council Redwood City, CA, USA.
  5. Cornell, C.A., Vamvatsicos, D. and Jalayer, F. (2000), "Seismic Reliability of Steel Frames", Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
  6. FEMA356 (2000), Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington, D.C., USA.
  7. Fenves, G.L., Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F. and Scott, M.H. (2004). Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (OpenSESS), Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
  8. Fragiadakis, M., Lagaros, N.D. and Papadrakakis, M. (2006), "Performance based earthquake engineering using structural optimization tools", Int. J. Reliab. Saf., 1(1-2), 59-76. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJRS.2006.010690
  9. Ganzerli, S., Pantelides, C. and Reaveley, L. (2000), "Performance‐based design using structural optimization", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 29(11), 1677-1690. https://doi.org/10.1002/1096-9845(200011)29:11<1677::AID-EQE986>3.0.CO;2-N
  10. Gholizadeh, S. (2015), "Performance-based optimum seismic design of steel structures by a modified firefly algorithm and a new neural network", Adv. Eng. Software, 81, 50-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2014.11.003
  11. Gholizadeh, S., Davoudi, H. and Fattahi, F. (2017), "Design of steel frames by an enhanced moth-flame optimization algorithm", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 24(1), 129-140. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2017.24.1.129
  12. Gong, Y., Xue, Y., Xu, L. and Grierson, D.E. (2012), "Energybased design optimization of steel building frameworks using nonlinear response history analysis", J. Constr. Steel Res., 68(1), 43-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.07.002
  13. Hajirasouliha, I., Pilakoutas, K. and Mohammadi, R.K. (2016), "Effects of uncertainties on seismic behaviour of optimum designed braced steel frames", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 20(2), 317-335. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2016.20.2.317
  14. HAZUS (1997), "Earthquake loss estimation methodology: Technical Manual", National Institute of Building for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., USA.
  15. Jalayer, F. and Cornell, C.A. (2003), "A technical framework for probability-based demand and capacity factor (DCFD) seismic formats", PEER 2003/08.
  16. Karaboga, D. (2005), "An idea based on honey bee swarm for numerical optimization", Technical Report-tr06, Erciyes University, Engineering Faculty, Computer Engineering Department.
  17. Kaveh, A., Fahimi-Farzam, M. and Kalateh-Ahani, M. (2015), "Performance-based multi-objective optimal design of steel frame structures: Nonlinear dynamic procedure", Scientia Iranica. Transaction A, Civil Engineering, 22(2), 373.
  18. Krishnamoorthy, C.S., Prasanna, V.P. and Sudarshan, R. (2002), "Object-oriented framework for genetic algorithm with application to space truss optimization", J. Comput. Civil Eng., 16(1), 66-75. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(2002)16:1(66)
  19. Lagaros, N.D. and Papadrakakis, M. (2007), "Seismic design of RC structures: A critical assessment in the framework of multi‐objective optimization", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 36(12), 1623-1639. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.707
  20. Liu, M., Burns, S.A. and Wen, Y.K. (2005), "Multiobjective optimization for performance‐based seismic design of steel moment frame structures", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 4(3), 289-306.
  21. Mirzai, N.M., Zahrai, S.M. and Bozorgi, F. (2017), "Proposing optimum parameters of TMDs using GSA and PSO algorithms for drift reduction and uniformity", Struct. Eng. Mech., Int. J., 63(2), 147-160.
  22. Moller, O., Foschi, R.O., Quiroz, L.M. and Rubinstein, M. (2009), "Structural optimization for performance-based design in earthquake engineering: applications of neural networks", Struct. Saf., 31(6), 490-499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.06.007
  23. Parsopoulos, K.E. and Vrahatis, M.N. (2002), "Recent approaches to global optimization problems through Particle Swarm Optimization", Nat. Comput., 1(2-3), 235-306. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016568309421
  24. Qiao, S., Han, X., Zhou, K. and Li, W. (2017), "Conceptual configuration and seismic performance of high-rise steel braced frame", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 23(2), 173-186. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2017.23.2.173
  25. SEAOC (1999), Blue Book: Performance-Based Seismic Engineering, Sacramento, CA, USA.
  26. Tehranizadeh, M. and Moshref, A. (2011), "Performance-based optimization of steel moment resisting frames", Scientia Iranica, 18(2), 198-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scient.2011.03.029
  27. Zhang, J. and Foschi, R.O. (2004), "Performance-based design and seismic reliability analysis using designed experiments and neural networks", Probab. Eng. Mech., 19(3), 259-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2004.02.009
  28. Zhu, G. and Kwong, S. (2010), "Gbest-guided artificial bee colony algorithm for numerical function optimization", Appl. Math. Comput., 217, 3166-3173.

Cited by

  1. Coupling SAP 2000 with ABC algorithm for truss optimization vol.87, pp.212, 2018, https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v87n212.79614
  2. An efficient discrete optimization algorithm for performance-based design optimization of steel frames vol.23, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433219872440
  3. Performance evaluation of composite moment-frame structures with seismic damage mitigation systems using wavelet analyses vol.74, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2020.74.2.201