DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

기관지유발검사 시행과 해석: 전문가 의견서

The KAAACI Standardization Committee Report on the procedure and application of the bronchial provocation tests

  • 임경환 (국군수도병원 내과) ;
  • 김민혜 (이화여자대학교 의과대학 내과학교실) ;
  • 양민석 (서울대학교 의과대학 보라매병원 내과) ;
  • 송우정 (서울대학교 의과대학 내과학교실) ;
  • 정재우 (중앙대학교 의과대학 내과학교실) ;
  • 이정민 (연세대학교 원주의과대학 소아청소년과학교실) ;
  • 서동인 (서울대학교 의과대학 소아청소년과학교실) ;
  • 신유섭 (아주대학교 의과대학 알레르기내과학교실) ;
  • 권재우 (강원대학교 의학전문대학원 내과학교실) ;
  • 김세훈 (서울대학교 의과대학 분당병원 내과) ;
  • 김상헌 (한양대학교 의과대학 내과학교실) ;
  • 이병재 (성균관대학교 의과대학 내과학교실) ;
  • 조상헌 (서울대학교 의과대학 내과학교실) ;
  • 대한천식알레르기학회 표준화위원회 (대한천식알레르기학회)
  • Lim, Kyung-Hwan (Department of Internal Medicine, Armed Forces Capital Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Min-Hye (Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine) ;
  • Yang, Min-Suk (Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government - Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center) ;
  • Song, Woo-Jung (Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Jung, Jae-Woo (Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Jeongmin (Department of Pediatrics, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine) ;
  • Suh, Dong In (Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Shin, Yoo Seob (Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Ajou University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kwon, Jae-Woo (Department of Internal Medicine, Kangwon National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Sae-Hoon (Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Sang-Heon (Department of Internal Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Byung-Jae (Division of Allergy, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Cho, Sang-Heon (Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • the Korean Academy of Asthma, Allergy and Clinical Immunology Standardization Committee (the Korean Academy of Asthma)
  • 투고 : 2017.09.01
  • 심사 : 2017.09.19
  • 발행 : 2018.01.31

초록

Bronchial provocation tests are of value in the evaluation of airway hyperresponsiveness. Nonspecific bronchial challenge (methacholine, mannitol, exercise, etc.) is used when the symptoms, physical examination, and measurements of pulmonary function are unremarkable in the diagnosis of asthma, when a patient is suspected of having occupational asthma or exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB), and when a screening test for asthma or EIB is required for some occupational groups in whom bronchospasm would pose an unacceptable hazard. Methacholine inhalation challenge is most widely used pharmacologic challenge and highly sensitive. For appropriate interpretation of the results of methacholine provocation, it is important to perform the test with the standardized protocol and to recognize that inhalation methods significantly influence the sensitivity of the procedure. Indirect challenges (e.g., mannitol and exercise) correlate with airway inflammation and are more specific but less sensitive for asthma. Indirect provocation tests are used to confirm asthma, to differentiate asthma from other airway diseases, and to evaluate EIB.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

참고문헌

  1. Busse WW, Lemanske RF Jr. Asthma. N Engl J Med 2001;344:350-62. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200102013440507
  2. Chapman DG, Irvin CG. Mechanisms of airway hyper-responsiveness in asthma: the past, present and yet to come. Clin Exp Allergy 2015;45:706-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/cea.12506
  3. Anderson SD, Brannan JD. Bronchial provocation testing: the future. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2011;11:46-52. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACI.0b013e3283423183
  4. Tiffeneau R, Beauvallet M. Epreuve de bronchoconstriction et de bronchodilation par aerosols. Bull Acad Med 1945;129:165-8.
  5. Cockcroft DW, Davis BE. Diagnostic and therapeutic value of airway challenges in asthma. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2009;9:247-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-009-0036-z
  6. Cockcroft D, Davis B. Direct and indirect challenges in the clinical assessment of asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2009;103:363-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60353-5
  7. Cockcroft DW. Direct challenge tests: airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma: its measurement and clinical significance. Chest 2010;138(2 Suppl):18S-24S. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.10-0088
  8. Anderson SD. Indirect challenge tests: Airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma: its measurement and clinical significance. Chest 2010;138(2 Suppl):25S-30S. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.10-0116
  9. Coates AL, Wanger J, Cockcroft DW, Culver BH; and the Bronchoprovocation Testing Task Force: Kai-Hakon Carlsen, Diamant Z, Gauvreau G, et al. ERS technical standard on bronchial challenge testing: general considerations and performance of methacholine challenge tests. Eur Respir J 2017;49(5). pii: 1601526. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01526-2016.
  10. Crapo RO, Casaburi R, Coates AL, Enright PL, Hankinson JL, Irvin CG, et al. This official statement of the American Thoracic Society was adopted by the ATS Board of Directors, July 1999. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161:309-29. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.161.1.ats11-99
  11. Martin RJ, Wanger JS, Irvin CG, Bucher Bartelson B, Cherniack RM. Methacholine challenge testing: safety of low starting FEV1. Asthma Clinical Research Network (ACRN). Chest 1997;112:53-6. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.112.1.53
  12. Freezer NJ, Croasdell H, Doull IJ, Holgate ST. Effect of regular inhaled beclomethasone on exercise and methacholine airway responses in school children with recurrent wheeze. Eur Respir J 1995;8:1488-93.
  13. Kim MH, Song WJ, Kim TW, Jin HJ, Sin YS, Ye YM, et al. Diagnostic properties of the methacholine and mannitol bronchial challenge tests: a comparison study. Respirology 2014;19:852-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.12334
  14. Anderson SD, Charlton B, Weiler JM, Nichols S, Spector SL, Pearlman DS, et al. Comparison of mannitol and methacholine to predict exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and a clinical diagnosis of asthma. Respir Res 2009;10:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-10-4
  15. Kim CW. Bronchial asthma with negative methacholine challenge test. J Asthma Allergy Clin Immunol 2012;32:150-1.
  16. Cockcroft DW, Davis BE, Todd DC, Smycniuk AJ. Methacholine challenge: comparison of two methods. Chest 2005;127:839-44. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.127.3.839
  17. Prieto L, Ferrer A, Domenech J, Perez-Frances C. Effect of challenge method on sensitivity, reactivity, and maximal response to methacholine. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2006;97:175-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60009-9
  18. Cockcroft DW, Davis BE. The bronchoprotective effect of inhaling methacholine by using total lung capacity inspirations has a marked influence on the interpretation of the test result. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006;117: 1244-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2006.02.038
  19. Todd DC, Davis BE, Hurst TS, Cockcroft DW. Dosimeter methacholine challenge: comparison of maximal versus submaximal inhalations. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2004;114:517-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2004.06.016
  20. Holzer K, Anderson SD, Douglass J. Exercise in elite summer athletes: Challenges for diagnosis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2002;110:374-80. https://doi.org/10.1067/mai.2002.127784
  21. Ban GY, Park HL, Hwang EK, Ye YM, Shin YS, Nahm DH, et al. Clinical characteristics of asthmatics having negative results to methacholine bronchial challenge. J Asthma Allergy Clin Immunol 2012;32:152-8.
  22. Nair P, Martin JG, Cockcroft DC, Dolovich M, Lemiere C, Boulet LP, et al. Airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma: measurement and clinical relevance. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2017;5:649-59.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2016.11.030
  23. Dell SD, Bola SS, Foty RG, Marshall LC, Nelligan KA, Coates AL. Provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% drop in FEV1 should be used to interpret methacholine challenge tests with modern nebulizers. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2015;12:357-63. https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.201409-433OC
  24. Sverrild A, Porsbjerg C, Backer V. The use of inhaled mannitol in the diagnosis and management of asthma. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2012; 13:115-23. https://doi.org/10.1517/14656566.2012.638917
  25. Porsbjerg C, Sverrild A, Backer V. The usefulness of the mannitol challenge test for asthma. Expert Rev Respir Med 2013;7:655-63. https://doi.org/10.1586/17476348.2013.847370
  26. Anderson SD, Brannan J, Spring J, Spalding N, Rodwell LT, Chan K, et al. A new method for bronchial-provocation testing in asthmatic subjects using a dry powder of mannitol. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;156(3 Pt 1):758-65. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.156.3.9701113
  27. Brannan JD, Anderson SD, Perry CP, Freed-Martens R, Lassig AR, Charlton B, et al. The safety and efficacy of inhaled dry powder mannitol as a bronchial provocation test for airway hyperresponsiveness: a phase 3 comparison study with hypertonic (4.5%) saline. Respir Res 2005;6:144. https://doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-6-144
  28. Miedinger D, Chhajed PN, Tamm M, Stolz D, Surber C, Leuppi JD. Diagnostic tests for asthma in firefighters. Chest 2007;131:1760-7. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.06-2218
  29. Miedinger D, Mosimann N, Meier R, Karli C, Florek P, Frey F, et al. Asthma tests in the assessment of military conscripts. Clin Exp Allergy 2010; 40:224-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2222.2009.03387.x
  30. Brannan JD, Koskela H, Anderson SD, Chew N. Responsiveness to mannitol in asthmatic subjects with exercise- and hyperventilation-induced asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;158:1120-6. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.158.4.9802087
  31. Holzer K, Anderson SD, Chan HK, Douglass J. Mannitol as a challenge test to identify exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in elite athletes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;167:534-7. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200208-916OC
  32. Porsbjerg C, Brannan JD. Alternatives to exercise challenge for the objective assessment of exercise-induced bronchospasm: eucapnic voluntary hyperpnoea and the osmotic challenge tests. Breathe 2010;7:52-63. https://doi.org/10.1183/18106838.0701.053
  33. Brannan JD, Koskela H, Anderson SD, Chan HK. Budesonide reduces sensitivity and reactivity to inhaled mannitol in asthmatic subjects. Respirology 2002;7:37-44. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1843.2002.00357.x
  34. Koskela HO, Hyvarinen L, Brannan JD, Chan HK, Anderson SD. Sensitivity and validity of three bronchial provocation tests to demonstrate the effect of inhaled corticosteroids in asthma. Chest 2003;124:1341-9. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.124.4.1341
  35. Leuppi JD, Salome CM, Jenkins CR, Anderson SD, Xuan W, Marks GB, et al. Predictive markers of asthma exacerbation during stepwise dose reduction of inhaled corticosteroids. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;163: 406-12. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.163.2.9912091
  36. Anderson WJ, Lipworth BJ. Relationship of mannitol challenge to methacholine challenge and inflammatory markers in persistent asthmatics receiving inhaled corticosteroids. Lung 2012;190:513-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-012-9396-6
  37. Porsbjerg C, Brannan JD, Anderson SD, Backer V. Relationship between airway responsiveness to mannitol and to methacholine and markers of airway inflammation, peak flow variability and quality of life in asthma patients. Clin Exp Allergy 2008;38:43-50.
  38. Sverrild A, Porsbjerg C, Thomsen SF, Backer V. Airway hyperresponsiveness to mannitol and methacholine and exhaled nitric oxide: a random-sample population study. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010;126:952-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2010.08.028
  39. Kim KW. Clinical implication of mannitol challenge test and exaled nitric oxide in childhood asthma. Seoul: Ministry of Health & Welfare, 2011.
  40. Park TY, Yi MJ, Choi WH, Kim SY, Yu R, Ban JE, et al. Relationship between atopy and bronchial hyperresponsiveness to indirect stimuli in asthmatic children. Allergy Asthma Respir Dis 2017;5:83-91. https://doi.org/10.4168/aard.2017.5.2.83
  41. Anderson SD. Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2013;33:xv-xvii. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iac.2013.05.001
  42. Parsons JP, Hallstrand TS, Mastronarde JG, Kaminsky DA, Rundell KW, Hull JH, et al. An official American Thoracic Society clinical practice guideline: exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013;187:1016-27. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201303-0437ST
  43. Pongdee T, Li JT. Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2013;110:311-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2013.02.002
  44. Park HK, Jung JW, Cho SH, Min KU, Kang HR. What makes a difference in exercise-induced bronchoconstriction: an 8 year retrospective analysis. PLoS One 2014;9:e87155. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087155
  45. Kippelen P, Anderson SD. Pathogenesis of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am 2013;33:299-312, vii. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iac.2013.02.002
  46. Anderson SD, Connolly NM, Godfrey S. Comparison of bronchoconstriction induced by cycling and running. Thorax 1971;26:396-401. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.26.4.396
  47. Choi IS, Ki WJ, Kim TO, Han ER, Seo IK. Seasonal factors influencing exercise-induced asthma. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res 2012;4:192-8. https://doi.org/10.4168/aair.2012.4.4.192
  48. Koh YI, Choi IS. Seasonal difference in the occurrence of exercise-induced bronchospasm in asthmatics: dependence on humidity. Respiration 2002;69:38-45. https://doi.org/10.1159/000049368

피인용 문헌

  1. New Approach to Chronic Cough: An Introductory Guide Based on Recent Clinical Practice Guidelines vol.94, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3904/kjm.2019.94.6.471
  2. Analysis of PC20-FEF25%-75% and ΔFVC in the methacholine bronchial provocation test vol.9, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4168/aard.2021.9.3.141
  3. Effect of overweight or obesity on lung function and asthma severity in prepubertal asthmatic children vol.9, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4168/aard.2021.9.4.231
  4. Relationships between lung function and clinical findings in school-age survivors of preterm birth vol.9, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.4168/aard.2021.9.2.69