한국콘텐츠학회논문지 (The Journal of the Korea Contents Association)

  • 제18권5호
  • /
  • Pages.123-130
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1598-4877(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2508-6723(eISSN)
한국콘텐츠학회 (The Korea Contents Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

한국 영어 학습자의 관점에서 본 통합과 분리 형태초점교수법

Integrated and Isolated Form-focused Instruction from Korean EFL Learners' Perspective

  • 투고 : 2018.03.02
  • 심사 : 2018.04.06
  • 발행 : 2018.05.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 한국대학생의 통합과 분리 형태초점 교수법에 대한 견해를 조사하고, 이러한 견해가 집중도와 문법학습의 믿음과 어떠한 상관관계가 있는 지, 추가적으로 수준별 성별 차이점을 조사하는 것이다. 본 연구의 목적을 위해서 서울소재 대학생 157명을 대상으로 실시한 설문지 조사 결과를 상관관계분석과 T 검정을 사용하여 분석하였다. 참여 학생들은 통합 형태초점교수법을 선호하는 것으로 나타났으며, 통합 형태초점교수법의 선호도는 학습자의 영어 수업시간의 집중도와 영어 수준과 유의미하게 연관성이 있다는 것을 보여준다. 다른 한편으로 분리 형태초점 교수법의 선호도는 학습자의 문법에 대한 믿음과 유의미한 상관관계를 보여주었고 수준별 성별로 모든 학생들이 공통적인 결과로 나타났다. 결론적으로 통합 형태초점 교수법은 학습자의 집중도와 영어 수준에, 분리 형태초점 교수법은 학습자의 문법 학습에 대한 믿음에 영향을 받는다는 것을 알 수 있다. 결론적으로 교실현장에서 통합 형태초점교수법을 사용할 필요하며, 이러한 접근도 학습자의 수준과 집중도를 고려할 필요가 있다는 것을 보여준다.

The present study aims to investigate how Korean EFL learners' views of form-focused instruction, integrated and isolated FFI (form-focused instruction), are related to their beliefs about grammar and attention and how different these relationships are between high and low proficiency levels and between males and females in Korean college contexts. The findings indicated the participants' strong preference for integrated FFI, which was significantly correlated with two factors, attention in English class and English proficiency. On the other hand, the isolated FFI was strongly correlated with their beliefs about grammar learning, that is, independent learning of grammar and importance of learning grammar rules. In conclusion, the integrated FFI was associated with students' proficiency and attention, while the isolated FFI was related to their views of grammar learning. In conclusion, it is suggested that we need to use integrated FFI in Korean EFL contexts considering students' levels of proficiency and attention.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. B. Laufer, "Comparing focus on form and focus on forms in second language vocabulary learning," Canadian Modern Language Review, Vol.63, No.1, pp.149-166, 2006. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.63.1.149
  2. N. Shintani, "The Effect of Focus on Form and Focus on Forms Instruction on the Acquisition of Productive Knowledge of L2 Vocabulary by Young Beginning‐Level Learners," TESOL Quarterly, Vol.47, No.1, pp.36-62, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.54
  3. N. Shintani, "The incidental grammar acquisition in focus on form and focus on forms instruction for young beginner learners," TESOL Quarterly, Vol.49, No.1, pp.115-140, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.166
  4. N. Spada and M. P. Lightbown, "Form-focused instruction: Isolated or integrated?," TESOL Quarterly, Vol.42, No.2, pp.181-207, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00115.x
  5. A. Valeo and N. Spada, "Is there a better time to focus on form? Teacher and learner views," TESOL Quarterly, Vol.50, No.2, pp.314-339, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.222
  6. A. Ansarin, B. Arasteh Abbas Abad, and M. Banan Khojasteh, "Isolated and Integrated Form-Focused Instruction from Learners' Perspective," The Asia Pacific Education Researcher, Vol.24, No.2, pp.299-307, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-014-0180-7
  7. Z. Elgun-Gunduz, S. Akcan, and Y. Bayyurt, "Isolated form-focused instruction and integrated form-focused instruction in primary school English classrooms in Turkey," Language, Culture and Curriculum, Vol.25, No.2, pp.157-171, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2012.683008
  8. N. Spada, L. Jessop, Y. Tomita, W. Suzuki, and A. Valeo, "Isolated and Integrated form-focused instruction: Effects on different types of L2 knowledge," Language Teaching Research, Vol.18, No.4, pp.453-473, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168813519883
  9. P. F. Tremblay and R. C. Gardner, "Expanding the motivation construct in language learning," Modern Language Journal, Vol.79, No.4, pp.505-518, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05451.x
  10. V. Incecay and Y. K. Dollar, "Foreign language learners'beliefs about grammar instruction and error correction," Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, Vol.15, pp.3394-3398, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.307
  11. S. Loewen, S. Li, F. Fei, A. Thompson, K. Nakatsukasa, S. Ahn, and X. Chen, "Second language learners' beliefs about grammar instruction and error correction," The Modern Language Journal, Vol.93, No.1, pp.91-104, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00830.x
  12. R. A. Schultz, "Focus on form in the foreign language classroom: Students' and teachers' views on error correction and the role of grammar," Foreign Language Annals, Vol.29, No.3, pp.343-364, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1996.tb01247.x
  13. R. A. Schultz, "Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback: USA-Columbia," The Modern Language Journal, Vol.85, No.2, pp.244-258, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00107
  14. R. Ellis, "Introduction: Investigating form- focused instruction," Language Learning, Vol.51, No.1, pp.1-46, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00147
  15. E. Simon and M. Traverniers, "Advanced EFL learners' beliefs about language learning and teaching," English Studies, Vol.92, No.8, pp.896-922, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013838X.2011.604578
  16. 강동호, "원어민과 한국인 영어교수자의 대학교 영문법수업과 오류분석에 관한 견해," 영어학, 제16권, 제2호, pp.265-284, 2016a.
  17. 강동호, "한국 고등학교 학생과 교사의 영문법 학습과 오류수정에 관한 견해," 중등영어교육, 제9권, 제3호, pp.59-76, 2016b.
  18. D. Kang, "EFL students' and teachers' beliefs about grammar learning and error correction in Korean secondary schools," Secondary English Education, Vol.10, No.2, pp.9-20, 2017.
  19. G. Jean and D. Simard, "Grammar teaching and learning in L2: Necessary, but boring?" Foreign Language Annals, Vol.44, No.3, pp.467-494, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2011.01143.x
  20. N. Spada, K. Barkaoui, C. Peters, M. So, and A. Valeo, "Developing a questionnaire to investigate second language learners' preferences for two types of form-focused instruction," System, Vol.37, No.1, pp.70-81, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2008.06.002