Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design (대한건축학회논문집:계획계)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Operation Direction of Regional Architectural Safety Center through Analysis of Japanese Building Confirmation System

일본의 건축확인제도 분석을 통한 지역건축안전센터의 운영 방향 설정

  • 백정훈 (한국건설기술연구원 국민생활연구본부) ;
  • 김은영 (한국건설기술연구원 국민생활연구본부)
  • Received : 2017.09.01
  • Accepted : 2018.04.23
  • Published : 2018.05.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

To prevent illegal building work in advance, regional building safety centers were introduced to perform technical investigations and management. The purpose of this study is to propose the detailed operational directions of the regional building safety center through the analysis on the current status of parameters, such as the operation of designated confirmation and inspection bodies in Japan. We consider the role, building administrative process and establishment criteria of regional building safety centers through the analysis the introduction background and the designation criteria of designated confirmation and inspection bodies. In establishing the center's professional manpower qualifications, we refer to the criteria for the professional qualifications of the designated confirmation and inspection bodies. In addition, the calculation method of required manpower of verification inspectors in Japan was used as a reference in setting the scale of regional professional manpower. Finally, we propose the detailed operational directions of the regional building safety center such as (1)roles of the center, (2)establishing management plan of the center, (3)work scope (4)scale of the professional manpower, (5)qualification of the professional manpower, and (6)funds.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 국토교통부

References

  1. Yu, K., Sim, K. Kim, H., Song, J., Son, JH, Lee, S., Kim, J. & Sim, W. (2011). Advancement Plan of Architecture Service Industry, Presidential Commission on Architecture Policy
  2. Kim, E. & Cha, J. (2014). Implementation and policy effects of the preliminary review system of public construction project plans, auri brief, 92.
  3. Cho, H. (2009). A study on participant's perception of architectural design review on multifamily housing, Master Thesis, Hanyang University.
  4. Kim, S., Lee, Y., Kim, J., & Song, J. (2015). A Study on Policy Development for Efficient Architectural Administration in the Region, -Focusing on rationalization of the architectural review system-, AURI-Basic-2015-8, auri.
  5. Kitamoto, Y. (2013). Jurisprudentially examination of designated certification and inspection organization and subject of construction agency, AIJ Annual Convention 2013 Technical Papers, 979-980.
  6. Sugiyama, Y. (2014). The Actual Situation and Problems to be solved concerning the Designated Building Confirmation and Inspection Bodies in Japan, The Japanese Journal of Real Estate Sciences, 27(4), 53-63 https://doi.org/10.5736/jares.27.4_53
  7. Yonemaru T. (2000). The Transformation of the Designated Building Confirmation and Inspection Bodies and the Revision of Building Standard Act, Policy Science, 7(3), 253-271.
  8. Building Council. (1997). Report on the new building administration in response to changes in the economic society and prospects of the 21st century. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport Japan. http://www.mlit.go.jp/jutakukentiku/build/info_19970324.html (Accessed 2017.07.27.)
  9. SNA(the Secretariat of the National Assembly) (2015), National assembly records in the Land Infrastructure and Transport Committee (Land Infrastructure Legislation and Judiciary Sub-committee), 337(1), pp.23-25.
  10. ACRC(Anti-Corruption & Civil Rights Commission)(2011), Fairness Improvement Plan of Infringement Penalty (Received Sep. 1 2017 Revised Nov. 6 2017 Accepted Apr. 23 2018)