대한영상의학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology)

  • 제78권3호
  • /
  • Pages.170-178
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1738-2637(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-2928(eISSN)
대한영상의학회 (The Korean Society of Radiology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

성인 좌심실 비치밀화증: 성인 63명의 영상의학적 소견과 임상양상

Left Ventricular Noncompaction in Adults: Imaging and Clinical Findings in 63 Patients

  • 조세진 (울산대학교 의과대학 서울아산병원 영상의학과, 영상의학과 연구소) ;
  • 양동현 (울산대학교 의과대학 서울아산병원 영상의학과, 영상의학과 연구소) ;
  • 강준원 (울산대학교 의과대학 서울아산병원 영상의학과, 영상의학과 연구소) ;
  • 임태환 (울산대학교 의과대학 서울아산병원 영상의학과, 영상의학과 연구소)
  • Cho, Se Jin (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Yang, Dong Hyun (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Kang, Joon-Won (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Lim, Tae-Hwan (Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2017.04.11
  • 심사 : 2017.10.01
  • 발행 : 2018.03.01
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적: 성인 심실 비치밀화증 환자의 영상의학적 소견과 임상양상을 기술하고자 하였다. 대상과 방법: 2000~2014년까지 본원에서 심 초음파, CT, 그리고 MRI 검사를 통해 63명의 환자가 심실 비치밀화증으로 진단되었다. 해당 심실 비치밀화증 환자를 대상으로 기본 질환 특징, 임상 양상, 동반 심 질환, 영상의학적 소견을 분석하였다. 그리고 동반 심 질환의 유무에 따라 단독 질환군과 복합 질환군을 구분하여 비교하였다. 결과: 63명의 환자 중 동반 심 질환이 없는 단독 질환군 환자는 32명(51%)이었다. 단독 질환군에서 복합 질환군에 비해 처음 진단될 당시의 나이가 많았다(54.2세 vs. 40.2세, p < 0.001). 복합 질환군에서 단독 질환군에 비해 진단 당시 증상이 더 많았다(94% vs. 75%, p = 0.082). 두 그룹 모두에서 심부전증과 연관된 증상이 가장 많았다(60.3%). 전체 환자에서 혈전색전증이 발생한 경우는 20명이었는데, 복합 질환군에서 단독 질환군보다 많았다(39% vs. 26%, p = 0.279). 동반 심 질환 중 가장 흔한 것은 확장성 심근병증이었다(n = 15, 24%). 영상의학적 소견상 두 질환군의 비치밀화/치밀화 비는 유의한 차이가 없었다. 결론: 성인 심실 비치밀화증은 단독 질환군과 복합 질환군, 두 그룹 간에 진단 당시의 나이와 임상양상에 차이가 있다. 임상양상과 영상의학적 소견은 심실 비치밀화증에 대한 이해에 도움이 될 것이다.

Purpose: To describe imaging and clinical findings for a left ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) in the adult. Materials and Methods: From 2000 to 2014, 63 patients were diagnosed with LVNC by echocardiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging at our hospital. Baseline characteristics, clinical manifestations, combined cardiac or systemic anomalies, and imaging findings were reviewed. We made a comparison between the isolated and combined disease groups. Results: Among 63 patients with LVNC, 32 (51%) patients did not have combined cardiac anomalies (isolated disease group). The mean age at the initial diagnosis was higher in the isolated than in the combined disease group (54.2 years vs. 40.2 years, p < 0.001). The combined disease group presented symptoms more frequently at initial diagnosis than the isolated disease group (94% vs. 75%, p = 0.082). Heart failure symptoms were the most common adverse events (60.3% in all patients). Thromboembolic events developed in 20 patients, and were more frequent in the combined disease group than in the isolated disease group (39% vs. 26%, p = 0.279). The most common cardiac abnormality was dilated cardiomyopathy (n = 15, 24%). There was no significant difference in the mean noncompacted/compacted ratios between both of the disease groups. Conclusion: Isolated and combined LVNC disease groups showed differences in age at diagnosis and clinical manifestations. The clinical and imaging findings may be helpful to better understand LVNC.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Centre

참고문헌

  1. Chin TK, Perloff JK, Williams RG, Jue K, Mohrmann R. Isolated noncompaction of left ventricular myocardium. A study of eight cases. Circulation 1990;82:507-513 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.82.2.507
  2. Benjamin MM, Khetan RA, Kowal RC, Schussler JM. Diagnosis of left ventricular noncompaction by computed tomography. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) 2012;25:354-356 https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2012.11928875
  3. Udeoji DU, Philip KJ, Morrissey RP, Phan A, Schwarz ER. Left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy: updated review. Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis 2013;7:260-273 https://doi.org/10.1177/1753944713504639
  4. Hofer M, Stollberger C, Finsterer J. Acquired noncompaction associated with myopathy. Int J Cardiol 2007;121:296-297 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2006.08.065
  5. Gati S, Papadakis M, Papamichael ND, Zaidi A, Sheikh N, Reed M, et al. Reversible de novo left ventricular trabeculations in pregnant women: implications for the diagnosis of left ventricular noncompaction in low-risk populations. Circulation 2014;130:475-483 https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.008554
  6. Jenni R, Oechslin E, Schneider J, Attenhofer Jost C, Kaufmann PA. Echocardiographic and pathoanatomical characteristics of isolated left ventricular non-compaction: a step towards classification as a distinct cardiomyopathy. Heart 2001;86:666-671 https://doi.org/10.1136/heart.86.6.666
  7. Stollberger C, Finsterer J, Blazek G. Left ventricular hypertrabeculation/noncompaction and association with additional cardiac abnormalities and neuromuscular disorders. Am J Cardiol 2002;90:899-902 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9149(02)02723-6
  8. Petersen SE, Selvanayagam JB, Wiesmann F, Robson MD, Francis JM, Anderson RH, et al. Left ventricular non-compaction: insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:101-105 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.03.045
  9. Jacquier A, Thuny F, Jop B, Giorgi R, Cohen F, Gaubert JY, et al. Measurement of trabeculated left ventricular mass using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of left ventricular non-compaction. Eur Heart J 2010;31:1098-1104 https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehp595
  10. Ho KK, Anderson KM, Kannel WB, Grossman W, Levy D. Survival after the onset of congestive heart failure in Framingham Heart Study subjects. Circulation 1993;88:107-115 https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.88.1.107
  11. Kramer CM, Barkhausen J, Flamm SD, Kim RJ, Nagel E; Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Protocols. Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocols 2013 update. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2013;15:91 https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-15-91
  12. Ritter M, Oechslin E, Sutsch G, Attenhofer C, Schneider J, Jenni R. Isolated noncompaction of the myocardium in adults. Mayo Clin Proc 1997;72:26-31 https://doi.org/10.4065/72.1.26
  13. Ichida F, Hamamichi Y, Miyawaki T, Ono Y, Kamiya T, Akagi T, et al. Clinical features of isolated noncompaction of the ventricular myocardium: long-term clinical course, hemodynamic properties, and genetic background. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:233-240 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(99)00170-9
  14. Oechslin EN, Attenhofer Jost CH, Rojas JR, Kaufmann PA, Jenni R. Long-term follow-up of 34 adults with isolated left ventricular noncompaction: a distinct cardiomyopathy with poor prognosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:493-500 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00755-5
  15. Rigopoulos A, Rizos IK, Aggeli C, Kloufetos P, Papacharalampous X, Stefanadis C, et al. Isolated left ventricular noncompaction: an unclassified cardiomyopathy with severe prognosis in adults. Cardiology 2002;98:25-32 https://doi.org/10.1159/000064677
  16. Murphy RT, Thaman R, Blanes JG, Ward D, Sevdalis E, Papra E, et al. Natural history and familial characteristics of isolated left ventricular non-compaction. Eur Heart J 2005;26:187-192 https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehi025
  17. Lofiego C, Biagini E, Pasquale F, Ferlito M, Rocchi G, Perugini E, et al. Wide spectrum of presentation and variable outcomes of isolated left ventricular non-compaction. Heart 2007;93:65-71 https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2006.088229
  18. Captur G, Nihoyannopoulos P. Left ventricular non-compaction: genetic heterogeneity, diagnosis and clinical course. Int J Cardiol 2010;140:145-153 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.07.003
  19. Habib G, Charron P, Eicher JC, Giorgi R, Donal E, Laperche T, et al.; Working Groups 'Heart Failure and Cardiomyopathies' and 'Echocardiography' of the French Society of Cardiology. Isolated left ventricular non-compaction in adults: clinical and echocardiographic features in 105 patients. Results from a French registry. Eur J Heart Fail 2011;13:177-185 https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjhf/hfq225
  20. Zemrak F, Ahlman MA, Captur G, Mohiddin SA, Kawel-Boehm N, Prince MR, et al. The relationship of left ventricular trabeculation to ventricular function and structure over a 9.5-year follow-up: the MESA study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;64:1971-1980 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.08.035
  21. Sarma RJ, Chana A, Elkayam U. Left ventricular noncompaction. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2010;52:264-273 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2009.11.001
  22. Niemann M, Stork S, Weidemann F. Left ventricular noncompaction cardiomyopathy: an overdiagnosed disease. Circulation 2012;126:e240-e243 https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.095059
  23. Towbin JA, Lorts A, Jefferies JL. Left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy. Lancet 2015;386:813-825 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61282-4
  24. Stollberger C, Finsterer J. Pitfalls in the diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrabeculation/non-compaction. Postgrad Med J 2006;82:679-683 https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.2006.046169
  25. Gati S, Rajani R, Carr-White GS, Chambers JB. Adult left ventricular noncompaction: reappraisal of current diagnostic imaging modalities. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2014;7:1266-1275 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.09.005