DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Impact of Pedal Arch Patency on Tissue Loss and Time to Healing in Diabetic Patients with Foot Wounds Undergoing Infrainguinal Endovascular Revascularization

  • Troisi, Nicola (Department of Surgery, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, San Giovanni di Dio Hospital) ;
  • Turini, Filippo (Department of Surgery, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, San Giovanni di Dio Hospital) ;
  • Chisci, Emiliano (Department of Surgery, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, San Giovanni di Dio Hospital) ;
  • Ercolini, Leonardo (Department of Surgery, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, San Giovanni di Dio Hospital) ;
  • Frosini, Pierfrancesco (Department of Surgery, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, San Giovanni di Dio Hospital) ;
  • Lombardi, Renzo (Department of Surgery, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, San Giovanni di Dio Hospital) ;
  • Falciani, Francesca (Diabetic Foot Center, Local Health Unit of Florence) ;
  • Baggiore, Cristiana (Diabetic Foot Center, Local Health Unit of Florence) ;
  • Anichini, Roberto (Diabetic Foot Center, Local Health Unit of Florence) ;
  • Michelagnoli, Stefano (Department of Surgery, Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Unit, San Giovanni di Dio Hospital)
  • Received : 2017.02.22
  • Accepted : 2017.04.20
  • Published : 2018.02.01

Abstract

Objective: To retrospectively evaluate the impact of pedal arch quality on tissue loss and time to healing in diabetic patients with foot wounds undergoing infrainguinal endovascular revascularization. Materials and Methods: Between January 2014 and June 2015, 137 consecutive diabetic patients with foot wounds underwent infrainguinal endovascular revascularization (femoro-popliteal or below-the-knee, arteries). Postprocedural angiography of the foot was used to divide the patients into the following three groups according to the pedal arch status: complete pedal arch (CPA), incomplete pedal arch (IPA), and absent pedal arch (APA). Time to healing and estimated 1-year outcomes in terms of freedom from minor amputation, limb salvage, and survival were evaluated and compared among the three groups. Results: Postprocedural angiography showed the presence of a CPA in 42 patients (30.7%), IPA in 60 patients (43.8%), and APA in 35 patients (25.5%). Healing within 3 months from the procedure was achieved in 21 patients with CPA (50%), 17 patients with IPA (28.3%), and in 7 patients with APA (20%) (p = 0.01). There was a significant difference in terms of 1-year freedom from minor amputation among the three groups (CPA 84.1% vs. IPA 82.4% vs. APA 48.9%, p = 0.001). Estimated 1-year limb salvage was significantly better in patients with CPA (CPA 100% vs. IPA 93.8% vs. APA 70.1%, p < 0.001). Estimated 1-year survival was significantly better in patients with CPA (CPA 90% vs. IPA 80.8% vs. APA 62.7%, p = 0.004). Conclusion: Pedal arch status has a positive impact on time to healing, limb salvage, and survival in diabetic patients with foot wounds undergoing infrainguinal endovascular revascularization.

Keywords

References

  1. Ramsey SD, Newton K, Blough D, McCulloch DK, Sandhu N, Reiber GE, et al. Incidence, outcomes, and cost of foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care 1999;22:382-387 https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.22.3.382
  2. Singh N, Armstrong DG, Lipsky BA. Preventing foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. JAMA 2005;293:217-228 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.2.217
  3. Boulton AJ, Vileikyte L, Ragnarson-Tennvall G, Apelqvist J. The global burden of diabetic foot disease. Lancet 2005;366:1719-1724 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67698-2
  4. Graziani L, Silvestro A, Bertone V, Manara E, Andreini R, Sigala A, et al. Vascular involvement in diabetic subjects with ischemic foot ulcer: a new morphologic categorization of disease severity. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007;33:453-460 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.11.022
  5. Manzi M, Cester G, Palena LM, Alek J, Candeo A, Ferraresi R. Vascular imaging of the foot: the first step toward endovascular recanalization. Radiographics 2011;31:1623-1636 https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.316115511
  6. Karacagil S, Almgren B, Bowald S, Eriksson I. Arterial lesions of the foot vessels in diabetic and non-diabetic patients undergoing lower limb revascularisation. Eur J Vasc Surg 1989;3:239-244 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-821X(89)80089-1
  7. Ciavarella A, Silletti A, Mustacchio A, Gargiulo M, Galaverni MC, Stella A, et al. Angiographic evaluation of the anatomic pattern of arterial obstructions in diabetic patients with critical limb ischaemia. Diabete Metab 1993;19:586-589
  8. Karacagil S, Almgren B, Lorelius LE, Bowald S, Eriksson I. Angiographic runoff patterns in patients undergoing lower limb revascularization. Acta Chir Scand 1989;155:19-24
  9. Rashid H, Slim H, Zayed H, Huang DY, Wilkins CJ, Evans DR, et al. The impact of arterial pedal arch quality and angiosome revascularization on foot tissue loss healing and infrapopliteal bypass outcome. J Vasc Surg 2013;57:1219-1226 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2012.10.129
  10. Manzi M, Fusaro M, Ceccacci T, Erente G, Dalla Paola L, Brocco E. Clinical results of below-the knee intervention using pedalplantar loop technique for the revascularization of foot arteries. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2009;50:331-337
  11. Gandini R, Del Giudice C, Simonetti G. Pedal and plantar loop angioplasty: technique and results. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2014;55:665-670
  12. Palena LM, Manzi M. Antegrade pedal approach for recanalizing occlusions in the opposing circulatory pathway of the foot when a retrograde puncture is not possible. J Endovasc Ther 2014;21:775-778 https://doi.org/10.1583/14-4801R.1
  13. Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Harkless LB. Validation of a diabetic wound classification system. The contribution of depth, infection, and ischemia to risk of amputation. Diabetes Care 1998;21:855-859 https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.21.5.855
  14. Lea Thomas M, Tanqueray AB, Burnand KG. Visualization of the plantar arch by aortography: technique and value. Br J Radiol 1988;61:469-472 https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-61-726-469
  15. O'Mara CS, Flinn WR, Neiman HL, Bergan JJ, Yao JS. Correlation of foot arterial anatomy with early tibial bypass patency. Surgery 1981;89:743-752
  16. Gloviczki P, Bower TC, Toomey BJ, Mendonca C, Naessens JM, Schabauer AM, et al. Microscope-aided pedal bypass is an effective and low-risk operation to salvage the ischemic foot. Am J Surg 1994;168:76-84 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9610(94)80040-5
  17. Davidson JT 3rd, Callis JT. Arterial reconstruction of vessels in the foot and ankle. Ann Surg 1993;217:699-708; discussion 708-710 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-199306000-00012
  18. Nakama T, Watanabe N, Kimura T, Ogata K, Nishino S, Furugen M, et al. Clinical implications of additional pedal artery angioplasty in critical limb ischemia patients with infrapopliteal and pedal artery disease. J Endovasc Ther 2016;23:83-91 https://doi.org/10.1177/1526602815610119
  19. Nakama T, Watanabe N, Haraguchi T, Sakamoto H, Kamoi D, Tsubakimoto Y, et al. Clinical outcomes of pedal artery angioplasty for patients with ischemic wounds: results from the multicenter RENDEZVOUS registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2017;10:79-90 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2016.10.025

Cited by

  1. BAD transmission and SAD distribution: a new scenario for critical limb ischemia vol.59, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.23736/s0021-9509.18.10572-6
  2. New Innovations and Devices in the Management of Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia vol.27, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1177/1526602820921555
  3. Digital Subtraction Angiography Prior to an Amputation for Critical Limb Ischemia (CLI): An Expert Recommendation Statement From the CLI Global Society to Optimize Limb Salvage vol.27, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/1526602820928590
  4. A Review and Proposed Classification System for the No-Option Patient With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia vol.28, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1177/1526602820963911
  5. A Novel Scoring System for Small Artery Disease and Medial Arterial Calcification Is Strongly Associated With Major Adverse Limb Events in Patients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia vol.28, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1177/1526602820966309
  6. GLASS (Global Limb Anatomic Staging System): a critical appraisal vol.62, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.23736/s0021-9509.20.11696-3
  7. Indirect Endovascular Revascularization via Collaterals: A New Classification to Predict Wound Healing and Limb Salvage vol.73, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2020.11.031
  8. Pedal arterial calcification score is associated with the risk of major amputation in chronic limb-threatening ischemia vol.75, pp.1, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2021.07.235