Clinical Endoscopy

  • 제51권1호
  • /
  • Pages.66-71
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2234-2400(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-2443(eISSN)
대한소화기내시경학회 (The Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Double-Balloon Endoscopy after Incomplete Colonoscopy and Its Comparison with Computed Tomography Colonography

  • Hermans, Carlijn (Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven) ;
  • van der Zee, Dennis (Department of Radiology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven) ;
  • Gilissen, Lennard (Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven)
  • 투고 : 2016.12.28
  • 심사 : 2017.10.25
  • 발행 : 2018.01.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background/Aims: Because of the national screening program for colorectal carcinoma in The Netherlands, the number of colonoscopies has increased. In case of incomplete colonoscopy, computed tomography colonography (CTC) and double-balloon colonoscopy (DBc) are alternative options. This study evaluated cecal intubation rate and pathology detection rate in the previously unexplored part of the colon, complication rate of DBc, and CTC results after incomplete colonoscopy. Methods: Retrospective observational study in a tertiary referral hospital regarding DBc and CTC reports from cases with incomplete colonoscopy. Results: Sixty-three DBcs were performed after incomplete colonoscopy. Cecal intubation rate was 95%. Detection rate was 58% (5% carcinoma and 3% high-grade dysplastic adenoma). CTC preceded 54% of DBcs and 62% of CTC findings were confirmed. In 16%, a biopsy was taken, and in 60%, an intervention (mostly polypectomy) was performed. One major complication (1.5%) occurred, i.e., arterial bleeding due to polypectomy necessitating right hemicolectomy. CTC (n=213) showed a possible lesion in 35%, and could be confirmed by follow-up endoscopy or surgery in 65%. Conclusions: DBc is effective and safe for completion of colon inspection in incomplete colonoscopy. In patients with a high likelihood of pathology, DBc is preferred over CTC.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Micksche M, Lynge E, Diehl V, et al. [Recommendations on cancer screening in the European Union]. Bull Cancer 2001;88:687-692.
  2. Rex DK, Petrini JL, Baron TH, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:873-885.
  3. Pohl H, Robertson DJ. Colorectal cancers detected after colonoscopy frequently result from missed lesions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;8:858-864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2010.06.028
  4. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The national polyp study workgroup. N Engl J Med 1993;329:1977-1981. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199312303292701
  5. Zauber AG, Winawer SJ, O'Brien MJ, et al. Colonoscopic polypectomy and long-term prevention of colorectal-cancer deaths. N Engl J Med 2012;366:687-696. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1100370
  6. Baxter NN, Goldwasser MA, Paszat LF, Saskin R, Urbach DR, Rabeneck L. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med 2009;150:1-8. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-150-1-200901060-00306
  7. Marshall JB, Barthel JS. The frequency of total colonoscopy and terminal ileal intubation in the 1990s. Gastrointest Endosc 1993;39:518-520. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(93)70162-5
  8. Dafnis G, Granath F, Pahlman L, Hannuksela H, Ekbom A, Blomqvist P. The impact of endoscopists' experience and learning curves and interendoscopist variation on colonoscopy completion rates. Endoscopy 2001;33:511-517. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2001-14964
  9. Jung Y, Lee SH. How do I overcome difficulties in insertion? Clin Endosc 2012;45:278-281. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2012.45.3.278
  10. Hotta K, Katsuki S, Ohata K, et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic interventions using the short double-balloon endoscope in patients after incomplete colonoscopy. Dig Endosc 2015;27:95-98.
  11. Hotta K, Katsuki S, Ohata K, et al. A multicenter, prospective trial of total colonoscopy using a short double-balloon endoscope in patients with previous incomplete colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012;75:813-818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2011.11.020
  12. Becx MC, Al-Toma A. Double-balloon endoscopy: an effective rescue procedure after incomplete conventional colonoscopy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;26:519-522. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000000067
  13. Koido S, Ohkusa T, Nakae K, et al. Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy at a Japanese academic hospital. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:6961-6967. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i22.6961
  14. Rex DK. Achieving cecal intubation in the very difficult colon. Gastrointest Endosc 2008;67:938-944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2007.12.028
  15. Pullens HJ, Siersema PD. Quality indicators for colonoscopy: current insights and caveats. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2014;6:571-583. https://doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v6.i12.571
  16. Neerincx M, Terhaar sive Droste JS, Mulder CJ, et al. Colonic workup after incomplete colonoscopy: significant new findings during follow-up. Endoscopy 2010;42:730-735. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1255523
  17. Gay G, Delvaux M. Double-balloon colonoscopy after failed conventional colonoscopy: a pilot series with a new instrument. Endoscopy 2007;39:788-792. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-966753
  18. Pooler BD, Kim DH, Lam VP, Burnside ES, Pickhardt PJ. CT colonography reporting and data system (C-RADS): benchmark values from a clinical screening program. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;202:1232-1237. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.13.11272
  19. Yamada A, Watabe H, Takano N, et al. Utility of single and double balloon endoscopy in patients with difficult colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. World J Gastroenterol 2013;19:4732-4736. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i29.4732
  20. Moreels TG, Macken EJ, Roth B, Van Outryve MJ, Pelckmans PA. Cecal intubation rate with the double-balloon endoscope after incomplete conventional colonoscopy: a study in 45 patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;25:80-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.05942.x
  21. Kaltenbach T, Soetikno R, Friedland S. Use of a double balloon enteroscope facilitates caecal intubation after incomplete colonoscopy with a standard colonoscope. Dig Liver Dis 2006;38:921-925. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2006.08.003
  22. Dzeletovic I, Harrison ME, Pasha SF, et al. Comparison of single- versus double-balloon assisted-colonoscopy for colon examination after previous incomplete standard colonoscopy. Dig Dis Sci 2012;57:2680-2686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-012-2227-z
  23. Pasha SF, Harrison ME, Das A, Corrado CM, Arnell KN, Leighton JA. Utility of double-balloon colonoscopy for completion of colon examination after incomplete colonoscopy with conventional colonoscope. Gastrointest Endosc 2007;65:848-853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2006.08.046
  24. Paonessa NJ, Rosen L, Stasik JJ. Using the gastroscope for incomplete colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:851-854. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0859-6
  25. Lichtenstein GR, Park PD, Long WB, Ginsberg GG, Kochman ML. Use of a push enteroscope improves ability to perform total colonoscopy in previously unsuccessful attempts at colonoscopy in adult patients. Am J Gastroenterol 1999;94:187-190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.00794.x
  26. Shumaker DA, Zaman A, Katon RM. Use of a variable-stiffness colonoscope allows completion of colonoscopy after failure with the standard adult colonoscope. Endoscopy 2002;34:711-714. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-33442
  27. Marshall JB. Use of a pediatric colonoscope improves the success of total colonoscopy in selected adult patients. Gastrointest Endosc 1996;44:675-678. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(96)70050-0
  28. Saifuddin T, Trivedi M, King PD, Madsen R, Marshall JB. Usefulness of a pediatric colonoscope for colonoscopy in adults. Gastrointest Endosc 2000;51:314-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5107(00)70361-0
  29. Gawron AJ, Veerappan A, Keswani RN. High success rate of repeat colonoscopy with standard endoscopes in patients referred for prior incomplete colonoscopy. BMC Gastroenterol 2014;14:56. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-14-56
  30. Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Halligan S, Marmo R. Colorectal cancer: CT colonography and colonoscopy for detection--systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 2011;259:393-405. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11101887
  31. Plumb AA, Halligan S, Pendse DA, Taylor SA, Mallett S. Sensitivity and specificity of CT colonography for the detection of colonic neoplasia after positive faecal occult blood testing: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2014;24:1049-1058. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-014-3106-0

피인용 문헌

  1. Balloon-Assisted Endoscopy: A Powerful Tool for Complete Colonoscopy vol.51, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2018.027
  2. Diagnostic evaluation of a deep learning model for optical diagnosis of colorectal cancer vol.11, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16777-6
  3. How I Approach Colonoscopy in Anatomically Difficult Colons vol.115, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000000481
  4. Computed Tomography Colonography Versus Standard Optical Colonoscopy for the Detection of Colorectal Polyp in Patients Who Faced Curative Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Diagnostic Performance Study vol.38, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/07357907.2020.1771724
  5. Balloon-Assisted Colonoscopy after Incomplete Conventional Colonoscopy—Experience from Two European Centres with A Comprehensive Review of the Literature vol.9, pp.9, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092981