The Korean journal of internal medicine

The Korean Association of Internal Medicine (대한내과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An overview of meta-analysis for clinicians

  • Lee, Young Ho (Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Medical Center)
  • Received : 2016.06.27
  • Accepted : 2017.09.05
  • Published : 2018.03.01
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The number of medical studies being published is increasing exponentially, and clinicians must routinely process large amounts of new information. Moreover, the results of individual studies are often insufficient to provide confident answers, as their results are not consistently reproducible. A meta-analysis is a statistical method for combining the results of different studies on the same topic and it may resolve conflicts among studies. Meta-analysis is being used increasingly and plays an important role in medical research. This review introduces the basic concepts, steps, advantages, and caveats of meta-analysis, to help clinicians understand it in clinical practice and research. A major advantage of a meta-analysis is that it produces a precise estimate of the effect size, with considerably increased statistical power, which is important when the power of the primary study is limited because of a small sample size. A meta-analysis may yield conclusive results when individual studies are inconclusive. Furthermore, meta-analyses investigate the source of variation and different effects among subgroups. In summary, a meta-analysis is an objective, quantitative method that provides less biased estimates on a specific topic. Understanding how to conduct a meta-analysis aids clinicians in the process of making clinical decisions.

Keywords

References

  1. Murad MH, Montori VM, Ioannidis JP, et al. How to read a systematic review and meta-analysis and apply the results to patient care: users' guides to the medical literature. JAMA 2014;312:171-179. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.5559
  2. Button KS, Ioannidis JP, Mokrysz C, et al. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci 2013;14:365-376. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3475
  3. Haidich AB. Meta-analysis in medical research. Hippokratia 2010;14(Suppl 1):29-37.
  4. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. 1996. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007;455:3-5.
  5. Guyatt GH, Sackett DL, Sinclair JC, Hayward R, Cook DJ, Cook RJ. Users' guides to the medical literature. IX. A method for grading health care recommendations. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 1995;274:1800-1804. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1995.03530220066035
  6. Glass GV. Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educ Res 1976;5:3-8.
  7. Walker E, Hernandez AV, Kattan MW. Meta-analysis: Its strengths and limitations. Cleve Clin J Med 2008;75:431-439. https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.75.6.431
  8. Egger M, Smith GD, Phillips AN. Meta-analysis: principles and procedures. BMJ 1997;315:1533-1537. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7121.1533
  9. Gotzsche PC. Why we need a broad perspective on metaanalysis. It may be crucially important for patients. BMJ 2000;321:585-586. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.321.7261.585
  10. Leenaars M, Hooijmans CR, van Veggel N, et al. A step-bystep guide to systematically identify all relevant animal studies. Lab Anim 2012;46:24-31. https://doi.org/10.1258/la.2011.011087
  11. Qi X, Yang M, Ren W, et al. Find duplicates among the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library Databases in systematic review. PLoS One 2013;8:e71838. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0071838
  12. Whitehead A, Whitehead J. A general parametric approach to the meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Stat Med 1991;10:1665-1677. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780101105
  13. Munafo MR, Flint J. Meta-analysis of genetic association studies. Trends Genet 2004;20:439-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2004.06.014
  14. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002;21:1539-1558. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1186
  15. Thakkinstian A, McElduff P, D’Este C, Duffy D, Attia J. A method for meta-analysis of molecular association studies. Stat Med 2005;24:1291-1306. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2010
  16. Davey Smith G, Egger M. Meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. Lancet 1997;350:1182.
  17. DerSimonian R, Kacker R. Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: an update. Contemp Clin Trials 2007;28:105-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2006.04.004
  18. Hedges LV, Vevea JL. Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychol Methods 1998;3:486-504. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.486
  19. Ried K. Interpreting and understanding meta-analysis graphs: a practical guide. Aust Fam Physician 2006;35:635-638.
  20. Zintzaras E, Lau J. Synthesis of genetic association studies for pertinent gene-disease associations requires appropriate methodological and statistical approaches. J Clin Epidemiol 2008;61:634-645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.12.011
  21. Salanti G, Sanderson S, Higgins JP. Obstacles and opportunities in meta-analysis of genetic association studies. Genet Med 2005;7:13-20. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.GIM.0000151839.12032.1A
  22. Copas J, Shi JQ. Meta-analysis, funnel plots and sensitivity analysis. Biostatistics 2000;1:247-262. https://doi.org/10.1093/biostatistics/1.3.247
  23. Thompson SG, Higgins JP. How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? Stat Med 2002;21:1559-1573. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.1187
  24. Dickersin K, Min YI. Publication bias: the problem that won't go away. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1993;703:135-146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb26343.x
  25. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 1997;315:629-634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
  26. Sterne JA, Egger M. Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis: guidelines on choice of axis. J Clin Epidemiol 2001;54:1046-1055. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00377-8
  27. Lau J, Ioannidis JP, Terrin N, Schmid CH, Olkin I. The case of the misleading funnel plot. BMJ 2006;333:597-600. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.333.7568.597
  28. Duval S, Tweedie R. Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plotbased method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 2000;56:455-463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0006-341X.2000.00455.x
  29. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:264-269. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
  30. Bailar JC 3rd. The promise and problems of meta-analysis. N Engl J Med 1997;337:559-561. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199708213370810
  31. Sharpe D. Of apples and oranges, file drawers and garbage: why validity issues in meta-analysis will not go away. Clin Psychol Rev 1997;17:881-901. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(97)00056-1
  32. Changelian PS, Flanagan ME, Ball DJ, et al. Prevention of organ allograft rejection by a specific Janus kinase 3 inhibitor. Science 2003;302:875-878. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1087061
  33. Song GG, Bae SC, Lee YH. Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib for active rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to methotrexate or disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Korean J Intern Med 2014;29:656-663. https://doi.org/10.3904/kjim.2014.29.5.656
  34. Lee YH. Meta-analysis of genetic association studies. Ann Lab Med 2015;35:283-287. https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2015.35.3.283
  35. Lee YH, Bae SC, Song GG. Gene-environmental interaction between smoking and shared epitope on the development of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies in rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis. Int J Rheum Dis 2014;17:528-535.
  36. Song G, Bae SC, Lee YH. Diagnostic accuracy of lung ultrasound for interstitial lung disease in patients with connective tissue diseases: a meta-analysis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2016;34:11-16.
  37. Song GG, Seo YH, Kim JH, Choi SJ, Ji JD, Lee YH. Association between TNF-${\alpha}$ (-308 A/G, -238 A/G, -857 C/T) polymorphisms and responsiveness to TNF-${\alpha}$ blockers in spondyloarthropathy, psoriasis and Crohn's disease: a meta-analysis. Pharmacogenomics 2015;16:1427-1437. https://doi.org/10.2217/pgs.15.90
  38. Lee YH, Nath SK. Systemic lupus erythematosus susceptibility loci defined by genome scan meta-analysis. Hum Genet 2005;118:434-443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-005-0073-1

Cited by

  1. Utilizing systematic reviews and meta-analyses effectively to evaluate brain tumor biomarkers vol.14, pp.10, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2217/bmm-2020-0209
  2. Association of functional IL16 polymorphisms with cancer and cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis vol.11, pp.36, 2018, https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.27715
  3. Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Differential Diagnosis of Malignant and Benign Soft Tissue Masses: A Meta-Analysis vol.46, pp.12, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2020.08.011
  4. LINC00511 as a prognostic biomarker for human cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis vol.20, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07188-3
  5. The Evidence-Based Practice Silent Enemy: Retracted Articles and Their Use in Systematic Reviews vol.8, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8040465
  6. Prognostic and Clinicopathological Value of ZWINT Expression Levels in Patients with Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis vol.76, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2021/e3222
  7. The Efficacy and Safety of Topical Tranexamic Acid for Spinal Surgery vol.27, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612827666210713160016
  8. The effectiveness and safety of Chinese herbal formulas on skin photoaging : A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis vol.100, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000024197
  9. Efficacy and Safety of Resistance Training for Coronary Heart Disease Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials vol.8, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.754794
  10. Diagnostic Accuracy of the Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Adult Post-Ganglionic Brachial Plexus Traumatic Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis vol.11, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11020173
  11. The Association between Interleukin-6 Gene Polymorphisms and Risk of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Meta-analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis vol.50, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/08820139.2020.1769646
  12. Effects of Antibiotics Versus Repeated Applications of Photodynamic Therapy as an Adjunctive Treatment for Periodontitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis vol.39, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2020.4917
  13. A meta-analysis: efficacy and safety of anti-epileptic drugs prescribed in Korea as monotherapy and adjunctive treatment for patients with focal epilepsy vol.29, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12793/tcp.2021.29.e1
  14. A brief introduction of meta‐analyses in clinical practice and research vol.23, pp.5, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgm.3312
  15. Conceptualizing the Role of Work Engagement: A Case Study of the Hotel Sector in Surabaya during the COVID-19 vol.8, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no5.0485
  16. Magnetic resonance imaging in mood disorders: a bibliometric analysis from 1999 to 2020 vol.9, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40336-021-00425-0
  17. The efficacy of vaccination to prevent human papilloma viruses infection at anal and oral: a systematic review and meta-analysis vol.196, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2021.05.012
  18. Comparative effectiveness and safety of non‐tumour necrosis factor biologics and Janus kinase inhibitors in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis showing insufficient response to tumour necr vol.46, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpt.13380
  19. The influence of white matter hyperintensity on cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease vol.8, pp.9, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.51429
  20. Self-learning software tools for data analysis in meta-analysis vol.74, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.21080
  21. Acupoint stimulation for cancer-related fatigue: A quantitative synthesis of randomised controlled trials vol.45, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2021.101490
  22. Pure 100% fruit juices – more than just a source of free sugars? A review of the evidence of their effect on risk of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes and obesity vol.46, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1111/nbu.12526
  23. The efficacy and safety of high-dose tranexamic acid in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a meta-analysis vol.16, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-02158-8
  24. Dualities of the vitamin D in systemic sclerosis: a systematic literature review vol.61, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s42358-021-00192-6
  25. Blood Neurofilament Light Chain in Genetic Ataxia: A Meta‐Analysis vol.37, pp.1, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.28783
  26. Comprehensive Laboratory Data Analysis to Predict the Clinical Severity of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in 1,952 Patients in Daegu, Korea vol.42, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2022.42.1.24