생체재료학회지 (Biomaterials Research)

  • 제22권1호
  • /
  • Pages.10-18
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1226-4601(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2055-7124(eISSN)
한국생체재료학회 (Korean Society for Biomaterials)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Differentiated osteoblasts derived decellularized extracellular matrix to promote osteogenic differentiation

  • Jeon, Jin (Department of Nanobiomedical Science & BK21 PLUS NBM Global Research Center for Regenerative Medicine, Dankook University) ;
  • Lee, Min Suk (Department of Nanobiomedical Science & BK21 PLUS NBM Global Research Center for Regenerative Medicine, Dankook University) ;
  • Yang, Hee Seok (Department of Nanobiomedical Science & BK21 PLUS NBM Global Research Center for Regenerative Medicine, Dankook University)
  • 투고 : 2017.12.13
  • 심사 : 2018.02.14
  • 발행 : 2018.03.01
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background: The extracellular matrix (ECM) can directly or indirectly influence on regulation of cell functions such as cell adhesion, migration, proliferation and differentiation. The cell derived ECM (CD-ECM) is a useful in vitro model for studying the comprehensive functions of CD-ECM because it maintains a native-like structure and composition. In this study, the CD-ECM is obtained and a test is carried out to determine the effectiveness of several combinations of decellularized methods. These methods were used to regulate the optimal ECM compositions to be induced by osteogenic differentiation using primary isolated osteoblasts. Result: We investigated the effect of osteoblasts re-seeded onto normal osteoblast ECM under the growth medium (GM-ECM) and the osteogenic differentiation medium (OD-ECM). The osteoblasts were then cultured statically for 1, 2, and 4 weeks in a growth medium or differentiation medium. Before osteoblast culture, we performed immunostaining with filamentous actin and nuclei, and then performed DNA quantification. After each culture period, the osteogenic differentiation of the osteoblasts re-seeded on the OD-ECMs was enhanced osteogenic differentiation which confirmed by alkaline phosphatase staining and quantification, Alizarin Red S staining and quantification, and von Kossa staining. The OD-ECM-4 W group showed more effective osteogenic differentiation than GM-ECM and OD-ECM-2 W. Conclusions: The OD-ECM-4 W has a better capacity in a microenvironment that supports osteogenic differentiation on the GM-ECM and OD-ECM-2 W. The ECM substrate has a wide range of applications as cell culture system or direct differentiation of stem cell and excellent potential as cell-based tissue repair in orthopedic tissue engineering.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)

참고문헌

  1. Frantz C, Stewart KM, Weaver VM. The extracellular matrix at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2010;(24):4195-200.
  2. Watt FM, Huck WT. Role of the extracellular matrix in regulating stem cell fate. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2013;14(8):467-73. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3620
  3. Hoshiba T, Lu H, Kawazoe N, Chen G. Decellularized matrices for tissue engineering. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2010;10(12):1717-28. https://doi.org/10.1517/14712598.2010.534079
  4. Manabe R, Tsutsui K, Yamada T, Kimura M, Nakano I, Shimono C, et al. Transcriptome-based systematic identification of extracellular matrix proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008;105(35):12849-54. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803640105
  5. Bissell MJ, Hall HG, Parry G. How does the extracellular matrix direct gene expression. J Theor Biol. 1982;99(1):31-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-5193(82)90388-5
  6. Boudreau N, Myers C, Bissell MJ. From laminin to lamin: regulation of tissues-pecific gene expression by the ECM. Trends Cell Biol. 1995;5(1):1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-8924(00)88924-2
  7. Ingber D. Extracellular matrix and cell shape: potential control points for inhibition of angiogenesis. J Cell Biochem. 1991;47(3):236-41. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.240470309
  8. Hynes RO. The extracellular matrix: not just pretty fibrils. Science. 2009;326(5957):1216-9. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1176009
  9. Jung JP, Bhuiyan DB, Ogle BM. Solid organ fabrication: comparison of decellularization to 3D bioprinting. Biomater Res. 2016;20(27):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-016-0048-4
  10. Chen RN, Ho HO, Tsai YT, Sheu MT. Process development of an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) for biomedical applications. Biomaterials. 2004;25(13):2679-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.09.070
  11. Whitlock PW, Smith TL, Poehling GG, Shilt JS, Van Dyke M. A naturally derived, cytocompatible, and architecturally optimized scaffold for tendon and ligament regeneration. Biomaterials. 2007;28(29):4321-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.05.029
  12. Bolland F, Korossis S, Wilshaw SP, Ingham E, Fisher J, Kearney JN, et al. Development and characterisation of a full-thickness acellular porcine bladder matrix for tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2007;28(6):1061-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.10.005
  13. Ott HC, Matthiesen TS, Goh SK, Black LD, Kren SM, Netoff TI, et al. Perfusiondecellularized matrix: using nature's platform to engineer a bioartificial heart. Nat Med. 2008;14(2):213-21. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1684
  14. Uygun BE, Soto-Gutierrez A, Yagi H, Izamis ML, Guzzardi MA, Shulman C, et al. Organ reengineering through development of a transplantable recellularized liver graft using decellularized liver matrix. Nat Med. 2010;16(7):814-20. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2170
  15. Ott HC, Clippinger B, Conrad C, Schuetz C, Pomerantseva I, Ikonomou L, et al. Regeneration and orthotopic transplantation of a bioartificial lung. Nat Med. 2010;16:927-33. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2193
  16. Petersen TH, Calle EA, Zhao L, Lee EJ, Gui L, Raredon MB, et al. Tissueengineered lungs for in vivo implantation. Science. 2010;329(5991):538-41. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1189345
  17. Badylak SF, Freytes DO, Gilbert TW. Extracellular matrix as a biological scaffold material: structure and function. Acta Biomater. 2009;5(1):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2008.09.013
  18. Cheng NC, Estes BT, Awad HA, Guilak F. Chondrogenic differentiation of adipose-derived adult stem cells by a porous scaffold derived from native articular cartilage extracellular matrix. Tissue Eng Part A. 2009;15(2):231-41. https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0253
  19. Liao J, Guo X, Grande-Allen KJ, Kasper FK, Mikos AG. Bioactive polymer/extracellular matrix scaffolds fabricated with a flow perfusion bioreactor for cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2010;31(34):8911-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.110
  20. Lu H, Hoshiba T, Kawazoe N, Koda I, Song M, Chen G. Cultured cell-derived extracellular matrix scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2011;32(36):9658-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.08.091
  21. Noh YK, Du P, Kim IG, Ko J, Kim SW, Park K. Polymer mesh scaffold combined with cell-derived ECM for osteogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells. Biomater Res. 2016;20(6):1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-016-0048-4
  22. Moursi AM, Damsky CH, Lull J, Zimmerman D, Doty SB, Aota S, et al. Fibronectin regulates calvarial osteoblast differentiation. J Cell Sci. 1996;109(6):1369-80.
  23. Cai R, Kawazoe N, Gg C. Influence of surfaces modified with biomimetic extracellular matrices on adhesion and proliferation of mesenchymal stem cells and osteosarcoma cells. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2015;126:381-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2014.11.050
  24. Kamiya N, Shigemasa K, Takagi M. Gene expression and immunohistochemical localization of decorin and biglycan in association with early bone formation in the developing mandible. J Oral Sci. 2001;43(3):179-88. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.43.179
  25. Chen XD, Fisher LW, Robey PG, Young MF. The small leucine-rich proteoglycan biglycan modulates BMP-4-induced osteoblast differentiation. FASEB J. 2004;18(9):948-58. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.03-0899com
  26. Miqueloto CA, Zorn TM. Characterization and distribution of hyaluronan and the proteoglycans decorin, biglycan and perlecan in the developing embryonic mouse gonad. J Anat. 2007;211(1):16-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2007.00741.x
  27. Palmer LC, Newcomb CJ, Kaltz SR, Spoerke ED, Stupp SI. Biomimetic systems for hydroxyapatite mineralization inspired by bone and enamel. Chem Rev. 2008;108(11):4754-83. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr8004422
  28. Shu R, Mcmullen R, Baumann MJ, McCabe LR. Hydroxyapatite accelerates differentiation and suppresses growth of MC3T3-E1 osteoblasts. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003;67((4):1196-204.

피인용 문헌

  1. Two-dimensional material-based bionano platforms to control mesenchymal stem cell differentiation vol.22, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-018-0120-3
  2. Recent advances in stem cell therapeutics and tissue engineering strategies vol.22, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40824-018-0148-4
  3. Cell-Derived Extracellular Matrix for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine vol.8, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.602009
  4. Acellular polycaprolactone scaffolds laden with fibroblast/endothelial cell‐derived extracellular matrix for bone regeneration vol.108, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36821
  5. The Role of miR-21 in Osteoblasts–Osteoclasts Coupling In Vitro vol.9, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9020479
  6. Construction and Biocompatibility of Three-Dimensional Composite Polyurethane Scaffolds in Liquid Crystal State vol.6, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.9b01838
  7. Bioinformatics analysis of the biological changes involved in the osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells vol.24, pp.14, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.15429
  8. Engineering Cell‐Derived Matrices: From 3D Models to Advanced Personalized Therapies vol.30, pp.44, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202000496
  9. Extracellular matrices derived from different cell sources and their effect on macrophage behavior and wound healing vol.8, pp.42, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1039/d0tb01885f
  10. Stem-cell-derived ECM sheet-implant complexes for enhancing osseointegration vol.8, pp.23, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1039/d0bm00980f
  11. Calcium Carbonate Nanoparticles-Toxicity and Effect of In Ovo Inoculation on Chicken Embryo Development, Broiler Performance and Bone Status vol.11, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11040932
  12. Boosting osteogenic potential and bone regeneration by co-cultured cell derived extracellular matrix incorporated porous electrospun scaffold vol.32, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/09205063.2020.1869879
  13. Methemoglobin‐Albumin Cluster Incorporating Protoporphyrin IX: Dual Functional Protein Drug for Photodynamic Therapy vol.22, pp.15, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.202100213
  14. Decellularized matrix could affect the proliferation and differentiation of periodontal ligament stem cells in vitro vol.56, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/jre.12889