Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Structural Relations between Feedback Types by Professors of University Physical Education and Self-Efficacy and Sport Continuance

대학 교양 체육수업에서 교수 피드백 유형과 자기효능감 및 운동지속의 구조적 관계

  • Song, Ki-Hyun (Department of Physical Education, Dankook University) ;
  • Kim, Seung-Yong (Major in Physical Education, Graduate School of Education, Donga University)
  • 송기현 (단국대학교 체육교육과) ;
  • 김승용 (동아대학교 교육대학원 체육교육전공)
  • Received : 2018.03.26
  • Accepted : 2018.05.20
  • Published : 2018.05.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the relations and analyze the mediation effect that exists between the feedback types by professors of university physical education and self-efficacy and sports continuance. The sampling method was used to survey physical education university students from three different universities located in the Greater Seoul Metropolitan Area. 309 samples were ultimately selected as valid samples. Data processing was carried out by using SPSS 18.0 and AMOS 18.0. The fidelity of the whole model was assessed through this process and then the theory was tested. The results were as follows. Firstly, if the perceived feedbacks by the professor were complimentary/encouragement and performance knowledge/positive nonverbal feedbacks it had a positive effect. Negative nonverbal perceived feedback had a negative effect forecast. Secondly, complimentary/encouragement perceived feedbacks by the professor did not have a meaningful impact on sports continuance index. Performance knowledge/positive nonverbal feedback resulted in static effect while negative nonverbal feedback had a negative effect. Lastly, self-efficacy served a meaningful mediation role in the relation between negative nonverbal feedback by the professor and sports continuance.

본 연구의 목적은 대학교양 체육수업에서 교수 피드백 유형과 자기효능감 및 운동지속의 구조적 관계를 규명하고 피드백 유형과 운동지속의 관계에서 자기효능감의 매개효과를 분석하는 것이다. 이러한 연구목적 달성을 위해서 수도권에 소재한 대학교 3곳에서 교양체육 수업을 수강하고 있는 학생을 대상으로 유의표본추출법을 이용하여 총 309부를 최종 유효 표본으로 선정하였다. 자료처리는 SPSS 18.0 및 AMOS 18.0을 사용하여 전체모형에 대한 적합도 검증을 실시한 후 가설검정을 하였다. 그리고 그 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 지각된 교수 피드백 유형에서 격려/칭찬 피드백과 수행지식/긍정적 비언어 피드백은 자기효능감에 유의한 영향을 미치지 않는 것으로 나타났고, 부정적 비언어 피드백은 자기효능감에 부적으로 예측하는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 교양 체육수업에서 지각된 교수 피드백 유형의 격려/칭찬 피드백은 운동지속에 유의미한 영향을 미치지 않고, 수행지식/긍정적 비언어 피드백은 정적으로, 부정적 비언어 피드백은 부적 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째. 학생들의 자기효능감은 운동지속에 유의미한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 마지막으로 교수 피드백 유형의 부정적 비언어 피드백과 운동지속의 관계에서 자기효능감은 유의미한 매개역할을 하는 것으로 확인되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. K. H. Song & J. Y. Huh. (2011). Relationship among perceived teacher's feedback, motivational-behavioral regulation strategies, and intention to continuance in participants of university ski and snowboard class. The Korean Journal of Sports Science, 20(3), 513-526.
  2. J. Curtis, W. Mcteer, & P. White. (1999). Exploring effects of school sport experiences on sport participation in later life. Sociology of Sport. 16. 348-365. https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.16.4.348
  3. X. Yang. (1997). A multidisciplinary analysis of physical activity, sport participation and dropping out among young finns, a 12-year follow up study. Likes Research Reports on Sport and Health, 103.
  4. A. Koka & V. Hein. (2003). Perceptions of teacher's feedback and learning environment as predictors of intrinsic motivation in physical education. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 4, 333-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1469-0292(02)00012-2
  5. A. Koka & V. Hein. (2006). Perceptions of teacher' positive feedback and perceived threat to sense of self in physical education: A longitudinal study. European Physical Education Review, 12(2), 165-179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356336X06065180
  6. M. J. Lyu & N. S. Pyo. (2006). Structural equation modeling analysis of teaching behavior, intrinsic motivation and class satisfaction. Korean Journal of Physical Education, 45(2), 241-249.
  7. K. H. Song & J. Y. Huh. (2012). Construct relationships between teacher's feedback, ability belief, and self-handicapping of students in P.E class. The Korean Journal of Sports Science, 21(4), 369-379.
  8. A. Koka & V. Hein. (2005). The effect of perceived teacher feedback on intrinsic motivation in physical education. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 36(2), 91-106.
  9. J. G. Nichols. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91, 328-346. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.91.3.328
  10. A. Bandura. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
  11. A. M. Lee. (2004). Promoting lifelong physical activity through quality physical education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 75(5), 21-55.
  12. B. J. Zimmerman. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82-91. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1016
  13. J. G. Park & K. H. Lee. (2011). The moderated effects of expectancy-values, self-efficacy, and task difficulty on middle school students' persistence in the physical education context. Korean Journal of Physical Education, 50(3), 251-262.
  14. F. M. Sirois. (2004). Procrastination and intentions to perform health behaviors: The role of self-efficacy and the consideration of future consequences. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 115-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2003.08.005
  15. M. J. Lyu. (2009). Validation of perception of teacher feedback(PTF) scale in physical education. Korean Journal of Physical Education, 48(2), 171-181.
  16. P. R. Pintrich, D. A. Smith, T. Garcia, & W. J. Mckeachie. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan.
  17. J. G. Park & K. H. Lee. (2010). Testing mediated and moderated effects of academic and social goals on task persistence in physical education . Korean Society of Sport Psychology, 21(3), 157-171.
  18. J. Guan, P. Xiang, R. McBride, & A. Bruence. (2006). Achievement goals, social goals, and student's reported persistence and effort in high school physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 25, 58-74. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.25.1.58
  19. X. Zhao, J. G. Lynch, & Q. Chen. (2010). Reconsidering baron and kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197-206. https://doi.org/10.1086/651257
  20. G. Holmbeck. (1997). Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: Examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65(4), 599-610. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.65.4.599
  21. M. J. Lyu. (2010). Perceived teacher feedback and intrinsic motivation of middle school students in physical education classes. Korean Journal of Physical Education, 49(1), 147-156.
  22. S. J. Yun, J. H. Lee, & H. S. Choi. (2016). Perceived feedback type of instructors and intrinsic motivation influences the performance confidence of college level dance majoring students. Journal of Korean Physical Education Association for Girls and Women, 30(3), 269-284. https://doi.org/10.16915/jkapesgw.2016.09.30.3.269
  23. K H. Lee. (2010). The impacts of perceived learning environment and teacher's feedback on high school students' intrinsic motivation in physical education. Korean Journal of Physical Education, 49(2), 83-92.
  24. K H. Lee. (2010). Coaches' behavior pattern and intrinsic motivation of athletes in track & field. Korean Journal of Sport Science, 20(1), 178-191.
  25. S. H. Lee. (2010). The relationships between athletes' internal motivation and sports leadership and the continuous performance of sports. Journal of Sport and Leisure Studies. 39(1), 127-136.
  26. J. Yoo, & S. G. Park. (2012). An analysis of the structural model among physical self-efficacy, exercise intention, and adherence behavior in Taekwondo. Korean Journal of Physical Education, 51(6), 153-163.
  27. W. S. Silver, T. R. Mitchell, & M. E. Gist. (1995). Responses to successful and unsuccessful performance: The moderating effect of self-efficacy on the relationship between performance and attributions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62, 286-299. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1051
  28. S. Y. Kim. (2016). Structural relationship among the perceived physical education learning environment, self-efficacy, and efforts/persistence. Korean Journal of Physical Education, 55(1), 323-333.
  29. A. E. Cox & D. E. Whaley. (2004). The influence of task value, expectancies for success, and identity on athletes' achievement behaviors. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 16, 103-117. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200490437930
  30. Z. Gao & M. Newton. (2008). Examining the mediating role of strategy use on students' motivation and persistence/effort in physical education. Journal of Sport behavior, 32(3), 278-297.
  31. P. Xiang, A. Chen, & A. Bruene. (2005). Interactive impact of intrinsic motivators and extrinsic rewards on behavior and motivation outcomes. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 24(2), 179-197. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.24.2.179
  32. J. Yoo & J. G. Park. (2014). The role of emotion in motivational processes for engagement in physical education. Korean Society of Sport Psychology, 25(2), 73-86. https://doi.org/10.14385/KSSP.25.2.73
  33. A. Assor, H. Kaplan, Y, Kanat-Maymon, & G. Roth. (2005). Directly controlling teacher behaviors as predictors of poor motivation and engagement in girls and boys: The role of anger and anxiety. Learning and Instruction, 15, 397-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.07.008