디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제16권5호
  • /
  • Pages.455-461
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

명화차용 인터랙티브 광고와 인쇄광고가 개인의 조절초점 성향에 따른 기억과 태도에 미치는 영향

The Effect of Art Infusion Interactive and Print Advertising on the Memory and Attitude According to the Reguratory Focus

  • 김민관 (중앙대학교 대학원 사진학과) ;
  • 한광석 (남서울대학교 광고홍보학과)
  • Km, Min-Kwan (Division of Photography, ChungAng University) ;
  • Han, Kwang-Seok (Dept of Advertising & Public Relations, Namseoul University)
  • 투고 : 2018.04.13
  • 심사 : 2018.05.20
  • 발행 : 2018.05.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 명화 차용 광고의 유형(인터렉티브형/ 인쇄광고형)과 조절초점(촉진초점/ 예방초점) 간에 기억 효과와 광고태도 효과를 싱험을 통해규명하였다. $2{\times}2$ 피험자간 요인설계를 하여 Two Way MANOVA분석을 통해 검증하였다. 명화 차용 광고 실험물은 '빈센트 반 고흐'의 '자화상'을 변형하여 조작하였다. 연구 결과, 첫째, 촉진초점 소비자들은 명화 차용 인터렉티브 광고를 인쇄광고보다 광고 관련 정보를 많이 기억하였으며, 광고 태도 역시 촉진초점 소비자들은 예방초점 소비자들과 비교하여 인터렉티브 광고를 긍정적으로 인식하였다. 둘째, 예방초점 소비자들은 촉진초점 소비자들과 반대로 명화차용 인쇄광고를 인터렉티브 광고보다 제품 관련 정보를 회상하는 경향이 두드러지게 나타났다. 이에 명화차용 광고를 기존 인쇄 광고나 방송 광고에서 확장하여 IT 기술과 접목한 인터렉티브 형태로 제작하여 흥미를 유발하여 기억과 태도에 영향을 미치기 위해서는 디지털 미디어를 통한 접근이 효과적이라 할 수 있다. 본 연구는 명화차용 광고를 인쇄 뿐 아니라 인터렉티브 미디어로 확장하여 실증적으로 연구되었다. 그러나 향후 연구에서는 명화광고의 유형을 다양화하여 실험을 할 필요성이 제기된다.

This study empirically examines the differences in advertising-related memory and product-related memory effects and ad attitudes between art infusion(interactive/ print advertising) and reguratory focus (promotion focus / prevention focus). Two - way MANOVA analysis was used for the factor analysis. The advertising experiment for renowned artists manipulated the 'self portrait' of 'Vincent Van Gogh'. The results of this study are as follows: First, promotion - focused consumers remember interactive advertising more than advertising printed advertisements in advertisements for advertising on publicity. Second, the consumers who focus on preventive focus tend to recall the information related to the product rather than the interactive advertisement.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Y. S. Sung & Y. Ryoo. (2014). Art Infusion Effect in Product Design: The Roles of Art Popularity and Art Image. The Korean Journal of Psychology, 15(4), 601-629.
  2. J. Storey. (1999). Cultural Consumption and Everyday Life. Oxford University Press.
  3. J. E. Koo. (2017). TheInfluence of Visual Art on IntertemporalChoices. The Korean Journal of Advertising, 28(4), 73-93.
  4. E. T. Higgins. (1998). Promotion and Prevention: Regulatory Focus as a Motivational Principle. M. Zanna(ed.). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 30. NY: Academic Press.
  5. E. T. Higgins. (1998). How Self-Regulation Creates Distinct Values: The Case of Promotion and Prevention Decision Making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(3), 177-191.
  6. H. Hagtvedt & R. H. Tukachinsky. (2005). The Use of Fine Art in Advertising: A Survey of Creatives and Content Analysis of Advertisements. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 27(1), 93-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2005.10505176
  7. Y. S. Cheon & J. W. Jun. (2011). Halo Effects of Visual Art Advertising. The Korean Journal of Avertising, 22(1), 7-27.
  8. D. M. Joo. (2009). A Study on the Relationship between Art Marketing Advertising and Consumer Response. Doctoral dissertation. Chungang University, Seoul.
  9. J. H. Kim. (2009). The Effect of the Ad with Art Image on the Consumers' Response. Journal of Public Relations, 13(1), 97-122. https://doi.org/10.15814/jpr.2009.13.1.97
  10. I. L. Shin & S. W. Shim. (2011). The Study on Interactive Outdoor Advertising Acceptance Digital Signage Stikus Wall Case. The Korean Journal of Advertising and Public Relations, 13(4), 391-432.
  11. S. H. Lee. (2017). Influence of Traditional Media and New Media Communication on Lovemarks, Satisfaction and Behavior Intention of Foodservice Industry. Journal of Digital Convergence, 80(1), 221-231.
  12. S. H. Park. (2000). A Study on Internet Advertisement and Ad Usage Orientation. Journal of Korean Advertising, 48, 23-37.
  13. A. Chernev. (2004). Goal-attitude Compatibility in Consumer Choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1), 141-150. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1401&2_16
  14. B. T. Kim & J. M. Kim. (2003). A Study on the Online Advertising Effectiveness of a Product Fit, an Involvement toward the Website and a Click Act. Journal of Marketing Management Research, 8(3), 55-81.
  15. S. H. Lee & J. Y. Tag. (2006). An Experimental Study on the Effect of Interactive TV Advertisement: Focusing on the Influence of Interaction Behavior and Results Variables. Journal of Advertising Research, 71, 177-196.
  16. D. H. Han & B. S. Park. (2010). The Acceptance and Effect of Interactive TV Advertising. Advertising Research, 6, 133-156.
  17. E. Higgins & Tory. (1998). Promotion and Prevention: Regulatory Focus as a Motivational Principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 1-46.
  18. E. T. Higgins & O. Tykocinski. (1992). Self-Discrepancies and Biographical Memory: Personality and Cognition at the Level of Psychological Situation. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 527-535. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292185002
  19. N. Liberman & L. C. Molden, E. T. Higgins. (2001). Promotional and Prevention Focus on Alternative Hypothesis: Implications for Attributional Functions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.1.5
  20. P. Lockwood. (2001). Could it happen to you? Predicting the impact of downward comparisons on the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 343-58.
  21. B. J. Chun & J. M. Kim. (2017). A Study on the Viewing Attitude and Intention for Perceived Usefulness and Ease of use of Terrestrial UHD Broadcasting - Center for Extended Technology Acceptance Model(ETAM. Journal of Digital Convergence, 80(1), 413-424.
  22. H. J. Jang&G. Y. Noh. (2017). ExtendedTechnologyAcceptance Model of VR Head-Mounted Display in Early Stage of Diffusion. Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(5), 353-361. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.3.353