DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on development of educational contents about combining computational thinking with design thinking

창의·컴퓨팅사고 교육내용 기본 설계 연구

  • Oh, Kyung-Sun (SW-Centric University Project Group, Dankook University) ;
  • Suh, Eung-Kyo (School of General Education, Dankook University) ;
  • Chung, Haejin (SW-Centric University Project Group, Dankook University)
  • 오경선 (단국대학교 SW중심대학사업단) ;
  • 서응교 (단국대학교 교양교육대학) ;
  • 정혜진 (단국대학교 SW중심대학사업단)
  • Received : 2018.03.14
  • Accepted : 2018.05.20
  • Published : 2018.05.28

Abstract

The objective of this study is to suggest the contents of education for software for Undergraduates who are not majoring in IT to cultivate creative and convergent people to prepare for the 4th Industrial Revolution. In the background, this study investigated the relationship between design thinking and computing thinking factors and examined the direction of software education to develop creative problem solving abilities. Two specialist questionnaires and focus group interviews were used to derive two levels of content elements for design thinking based computing thinking. According to the results of the analysis, This research is based on the process of design thinking, focusing on diffuse thinking at the first level, and the whole contents are composed. The process of producing a prototype was used to derive the computational thinking contents necessary for problem solving. This study focuses on convergent thinking at the second level and draws out the contents of computing thought to embody the first level contents of various ideas and stories into computing. It is expected that this study will be used as basic data to develop the content and method of education as SW education for non - major subject in university.

본 연구는 4차 산업혁명을 맞이한 현 시대에서 요구하는 창의 융합형 인재를 기르기 위해 대학에서 진행하는 비전공자 대상 소프트웨어교육에 필요한 교육내용을 제안하는데 그 목적이 있다. 우선 선행연구를 통해 디자인씽킹 개념과 컴퓨팅사고요소간의 관계를 통해 창의적 문제해결능력을 길러내기 위한 소프트웨어교육 방향을 알아보고 디자인씽킹 기반의 컴퓨팅사고를 위한 두 개 수준별 교육내용요소들을 도출하고자 한다. 이를 위해 두 차례에 걸친 전문가 설문 조사와 포커스 그룹 인터뷰를 통해 내용들을 분석하였다. 연구 결과 1수준에서는 확산적 사고에 초점을 두고 디자인씽킹의 프로세스를 기반으로 전체 내용을 구성하되 프로토타입을 제작하는 프로세스부터는 문제해결에 필요한 컴퓨팅사고 내용들을 도출하였다. 2수준에서는 수렴적 사고에 초점을 두고 1수준의 내용인 다양한 아이디어와 스토리를 컴퓨팅으로 구체화하여 실현하기 위한 컴퓨팅사고 내용들을 도출하였다. 본 연구를 통해 대학에서의 비전공 대상의 SW기초교양으로서 교육내용과 방법을 개발하는데 기초자료로 활용될 것으로 기대한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Education Department. (2018). 2015 Revised National Curriculum. Retrieved from http://ncic.go.kr/mobile.dwn.ogf.inventoryList.do
  2. J. Sung & H. Kim. (2015). Analysis on the international comparison of computer education in schools. The Journal of Korean association of computer education, 18(1), 45-54.
  3. Examples of foreign software education and implications.(2018). Retrieved from http://edzine.kedi.re.kr/2015/summer/article/world_02.jsp
  4. LitingLee, Sanxin, Huangzheng, & HuangmingWay. (2014). Notes from Stanford University's Design Thinking Lecture. Seoul : insert.
  5. Design Thinking for Educators. (2018). Retrieved from https://designthinkingforeducators.com.
  6. J. Y. Lee & J. M. Rhi. (2010). A Comparative Study on the Meaning of Design Thinking: In a view of Herbert Simon's design thinking and IDEO's design thinking. Proceedings of Korean Society of Design Science, 10, 62-63.
  7. M. H. Kyung. (2010). Using design process creative ideas development research on education; Ideas for the development of Work Sheet. Master dissertation, Daegu University,Daegu.
  8. S. S. Jeon. (2005). A Investigative Study on Design Process Based Design Instruction Models. The Journal of Art Education, 19, 355-385.
  9. Design Thinking. (2018). Retrieved from https://www.ideou.com/pages/design-thinking
  10. S. G. Isaksen & D. J. Treffinger. (1985). Creative problem solving. The Basic Course. New York: Bearly Limited.
  11. S. M. Han, S. H. Kim , & W. L. Kyun. (2005). Creativity. Seoul: hakjisa.
  12. Computational Thinking for all.(2018). Retrieved from https://www.iste.org/explore/articleDetail?articleid=152.
  13. K. S. Oh. (2016). A study on the contents of computational thinking for programming education.Ph.D. dissertation, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul.
  14. K. S. Oh & S. J. Ahh. (2013). A study on the probelm-solving process model based on the computational thinking to improve creativity. The journal of korean association of computer education, 17(1), 183-186.
  15. K. S. Oh & S. J. Ahh. (2016). A study on development of educational contents about computational thinking. The journal of korean association of computer education, 19(2), 11-20.
  16. C. H. Lawshe. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563-575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
  17. H. D. Song. (2007). Instructional Design Principles for Enhancing Creative Problem Solving Skills. The journal of Korea Association of Yeolin Education, 15(3), 55-73.
  18. J. H. Chun & J. Y. Yoo. (2014). Trials and effects of a learner-centered creative training technique on undergraduate education of medical record information management. Journal of Digital Convergence, 12(3), 277-288. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2014.12.3.277
  19. J. Y. Seo, S. H. Shin,& E. H. Goo. (2017). Analysis of Changes of Digital Mind by the Class Type in Basic Software Education for the Students of Humanities. Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(9), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2017.15.3.55
  20. J. H. Kim. (2018). KISTEP. KISTEP InI. Retrieved from http://www.kistep.re.kr/c3/sub3_2.jsp?.
  21. Y. S. Lee. (2018). Python-based Software Education Model for Non-Computer Majors. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 9(3), 73-78 https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2018.9.3.073
  22. S. J. Kim & D. E. Cho. (2018). A Stduy on Learning Model for Effective Coding Education. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 9(2), 7-12. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2018.9.2.007