DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Impact spectrum of flood hazard on seismic vulnerability of bridges

  • Yilmaz, Taner (Department of Civil Engineering, Ozyegin University) ;
  • Banerjee, Swagata (Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay)
  • Received : 2017.07.06
  • Accepted : 2018.03.02
  • Published : 2018.05.25

Abstract

Multiple hazards (multihazard) conditions may cause significant risk to structures that are originally designed for individual hazard scenarios. Such a multihazard condition arises when an earthquake strikes to a bridge pre-exposed to scour at foundations due to flood events. This study estimates the impact spectrum of flood-induced scour on seismic vulnerability of bridges. Characteristic river-crossing highway bridges are formed based on the information obtained from bridge inventories. These bridges are analyzed under earthquake-only and the abovementioned multihazard conditions, and bridge fragility curves are developed at component and system levels. Research outcome shows that bridges having pile shafts as foundation elements are protected from any additional seismic vulnerability due to the presence of scour. However, occurrence of floods can increase seismic fragility of bridges at lower damage states due to the adverse impact of scour on bridge components at superstructure level. These findings facilitate bridge design under the stated multihazard condition.

Keywords

References

  1. Alipour, A., Shafei, B. and Shinozuka, M. (2013), "Reliability-based calibration of load and resistance factors for design of RC bridges under multiple extreme events: Scour and earthquake", J. Brid. Eng., 18(5), 362-371. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000369
  2. API (2003), Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platform-Working Stress Design, American Petroleum Institute, Washington, U.S.A.
  3. Arneson, L.A.M., Zevenbergen, L.W., Lagasse, P.F. and Clopper, P.E. (2012), Evaluating Scour at Bridges, Hydraulic Engineering Circular (HEC) No.18, Publication No. FHWA-HIF-12-003, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, U.S.A.
  4. Aviram, A., Mackie, K.R. and Stojadinovic, B. (2008), "Effect of abutment modeling on the seismic response of bridge structures", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vibr., 7(4), 395-402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-008-1008-3
  5. Banerjee, S. and Prasad, G.G. (2011), "Analysis of bridge performance under the combined effect of earthquake and scour", Proceedings of the International Conference on Vulnerability and Risk Analysis and Management (ICVRAM)/5th International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis, College Park, Maryland, U.S.A., April.
  6. Banerjee, S. and Prasad, G.G. (2013), "Seismic risk assessment of reinforced concrete bridges in flood-prone regions", Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 9(9), 952-968. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2011.649292
  7. Caltrans (2000), Bridge Design Specification, California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, California, U.S.A.
  8. Caltrans (2008), Section 10 Reinforced Concrete Box Girders, Memo to designers, California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, California, U.S.A.
  9. Caltrans (2013), Seismic Design Criteria Version 1.7, California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, California, U.S.A.
  10. Chandrasekaran, S. and Banerjee, S. (2016), "Retrofit optimization for resilience enhancement of bridges under multihazard scenario", J. Struct. Eng., 142(8), C4015012. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001396
  11. Chang, K.C., Sung, Y.C., Liu, K.Y., Wang, P.H., Lee, Z.K., Lee, L.S. and Witarto. (2014), "Seismic performance of an existing bridge with scoured caisson foundation", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vibr., 13(1), 151-165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-014-0219-z
  12. Deco, A. and Frangopol, D.M. (2011), "Risk assessment of highway bridges under multiple hazards", J. Risk Res., 14(9), 1057-1089. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2011.571789
  13. Dong, Y., Frangopol, D.M. and Saydam, D. (2013), "Time-variant sustainability assessment of seismically vulnerable bridges subjected to multiple hazards", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 42(10), 1451-1467. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2281
  14. FEMA (2004), Using HAZUS-MH for Risk Assessment, Technical manual, Department of Homeland Security, FEMA Mitigation Division, Washington, U.S.A.
  15. Ghosn, M., Moses, F. and Wang, J. (2003), Highway Bridge Design for Extreme Events, National Cooperative Highway Research Program, NCHRP Report 489, Transportation Research Board, National Academy Press, Washington, U.S.A.
  16. Guo, X. and Chen, Z.Q. (2016), "Lifecycle multihazard framework for assessing flood scour and earthquake effects on bridge failure", ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncert. Eng. Syst., Part A: Civil Eng., 2(2), C4015004. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0000844
  17. Guo, X., Wu, Y. and Guo, Y. (2016), "Time-dependent seismic fragility analysis of bridge systems under scour hazard and earthquake loads", Eng. Struct., 121, 52-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.04.038
  18. Han, Z., Ye, A. and Fan, L. (2010), "Effects of riverbed scour on seismic performance of high-rise pile cap foundation", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vibr., 9(4), 533-543. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-010-0035-z
  19. Johnson, P.A. and Dock, D. (1998), "Probabilistic bridge scour estimates", J. Hydraul. Eng., 124(7), 750-754. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1998)124:7(750)
  20. Lee, G.C., Liang, Z., Shen, J.J. and O'Connor, J.S. (2011), Extreme Load Combinations: A Survey of State Bridge Engineers, Technical Report MCEER-11-0007, MCEER: Earthquake Engineering to Extreme Events, The State University of New York at Buffalo, New York, U.S.A.
  21. Mander, J.B., Priestley, M.J.N. and Park, R. (1988), "Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete", J. Struct. Eng., 114(8), 1804-1826. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804)
  22. McKenna, F. and Fenves, G.L. (2012), Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation, Version 2.4.0., Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Berkeley, California, U.S.A.
  23. Megally, S.H., Silva, P.F. and Seible, F. (2002), Seismic Response of Sacrificial Shear Keys in Bridge Abutments, Report No. Project SSRP-2001/23, University of California, San Diego, U.S.A.
  24. NBI (2014), National Bridge Inventory Data, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, U.S.A.
  25. Padgett, J.E. and DesRoches, R. (2007), "Sensitivity of seismic response and fragility to parameter uncertainty", J. Struct. Eng., 133(12), 1710-1718. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:12(1710)
  26. PEER (2015), PEER NGA Database, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
  27. Prasad, G.G. and Banerjee, S. (2013) "The impact of flood-Induced scour on seismic fragility characteristics of bridges", J. Earthq. Eng., 17(9), 803-828. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2013.771593
  28. Ramanathan, K.N. (2012), "Next generation seismic fragility curves for California bridge incorporating the evolution in seismic design philosophy", Ph.D. Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology, Georgia, U.S.A.
  29. Shamsabadi, A., Rollins, K.M. and Kapuskar, M. (2007), "Nonlinear soil-abutment-bridge structure interaction for seismic performance-based design", J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 133(6), 707-720. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:6(707)
  30. USGS (2008), Hazard Curve Application, United States Geological Survey.
  31. USGS (2015), National Water Information System, United States Geological Survey.
  32. Wang, Z., Duenas-Osorio, L. and Padgett, J.E. (2014), "Influence of scour effects on the seismic response of reinforced concrete bridges", Eng. Struct., 76, 202-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.06.026
  33. Wang, Z., Song, W. and Li, T. (2012), "Combined fragility surface analysis of earthquake and scour hazards for bridge", Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal.
  34. Yilmaz, T. (2015), "Risk assessment of highway bridges under multi-hazard effect of flood-induced scour and earthquake", Ph.D. Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, U.S.A.
  35. Yilmaz, T., Banerjee, S. and Johnson, P.A. (2016), "Performance of two real-life California bridges under regional natural hazards", J. Brid. Eng., 21(3), 04015063. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000827
  36. Yilmaz, T., Banerjee, S. and Johnson, P.A. (2017), "Risk and uncertainty assessment of a highway bridge for integrated seismic and flood hazards", Struct. Infrastruct. Eng.

Cited by

  1. Multihazard resilience of highway bridges and bridge networks: a review vol.15, pp.12, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2019.1648526