Earthquakes and Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A stochastic adaptive pushover procedure for seismic assessment of buildings

  • Jafari, Mohammad (Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University) ;
  • Soltani, Masoud (Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University)
  • Received : 2017.04.27
  • Accepted : 2018.04.16
  • Published : 2018.05.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Recently, the adaptive nonlinear static analysis method has been widely used in the field of performance based earthquake engineering. However, the proposed methods are almost deterministic and cannot directly consider the seismic record uncertainties. In the current study an innovative Stochastic Adaptive Pushover Analysis, called "SAPA", based on equivalent hysteresis system responses is developed to consider the earthquake record to record uncertainties. The methodology offers a direct stochastic analysis which estimates the seismic demands of the structure in a probabilistic manner. In this procedure by using a stochastic linearization technique in each step, the equivalent hysteresis system is analyzed and the probabilistic characteristics of the result are obtained by which the lateral force pattern is extracted and the actual structure is pushed. To compare the results, three different types of analysis have been considered; conventional pushover methods, incremental dynamic analysis, IDA, and the SAPA method. The result shows an admirable accuracy in predicting the structure responses.

Keywords

References

  1. Anagnostopoulos, S.A., Kyrkos, M.T. and Stathopoulos, K.G. (2015), "Earthquake induced torsion in buildings: critical review and state of the art", Earthq. Struct., 8(2), 305-377. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2015.8.2.305
  2. Antoniou, S. and Pinho, R. (2004), "Development and verification of a displacement-based adaptive pushover procedure", J. Earthq. Eng., 8(5), 643-661. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460409350504
  3. Araujo, M., Marques, M. and Delgado, R. (2014), "Multidirectional pushover analysis for seismic assessment of irregular-in-plan bridges", Eng. Struct., 79, 375-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.08.032
  4. ASCE/SEI 41-13 (2013), Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings, Structural Engineering Institute, Reston, VA.
  5. ATC, A. (1996), 40, Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, Applied Technology Council, Report ATC-40, Redwood City.
  6. Baros, D.K. and Anagnostopoulos, S.A. (2017), "A new approach for 3-D pushover based analysis of asymmetric buildings: development and initial evaluation", Earthq. Struct., 12(5), 543-557. https://doi.org/10.12989/EAS.2017.12.5.543
  7. Baros, D.K. and Dritsos, S.E. (2008), "A simplified procedure to select a suitable retrofit strategy for existing RC buildings using pushover analysis", J. Earthq. Eng., 12(6), 823-848. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460801890240
  8. Beheshti-Aval, S.B. and Keshani, S. (2014), "A Phenomenological study on inelastic torsion caused by nonlinear behavior changes during earthquake excitations", Civil Eng. Infrastr. J., 47(2), 273-290.
  9. Bouc, R. (1967), "Forced vibration of mechanical systems with hysteresis", Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Nonlinear Oscillation, Prague, Czechoslovakia, September.
  10. Bracci, J.M., Kunnath, S.K. and Reinhorn, A.M. (1997), "Seismic performance and retrofit evaluation of reinforced concrete structures", J. Struct. Eng., 123(1), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:1(3)
  11. Charalampakis, A.E. and Koumousis, V.K. (2008), "On the response and dissipated energy of Bouc-Wen hysteretic model", J. Sound Vib., 309(3), 887-895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2007.07.080
  12. Chopra, A.K. and Goel, R.K. (2002), "A modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands for buildings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 561-582. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.144
  13. Davenport, A.G. (1964), "Note on the distribution of the largest value of a random function with application to gust loading", Proc., Inst. Civil Eng., 28, 187-196.
  14. Elghadamsi, F.E., Mohraz, B., Lee, C.T. and Moayyad, P. (1988), "Time-dependent power spectral density of earthquake ground motion", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 7(1), 15-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(88)80011-3
  15. Elnashai, A.S. (2001), "Advanced inelastic static (pushover) analysis for earthquake applications", Struct. Eng. Mech., 12(1), 51-70. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2001.12.1.051
  16. Foliente, G.C. (1993), "Stochastic dynamic response of wood structural systems", Ph.D. Dissertation, Virginia Tech, Virginia.
  17. Gupta, B. and Kunnath, S.K. (2000), "Adaptive spectra-based pushover procedure for seismic evaluation of structures", Earthq. Spectra, 16(2), 367-392. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586117
  18. Hurtado, J.E. and Barbat, A.H. (2000), "Equivalent linearization of the Bouc-Wen hysteretic model", Eng. Struct., 22(9), 1121-1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(99)00056-5
  19. Kalkan, E. and Kunnath, S.K. (2006), "Adaptive modal combination procedure for nonlinear static analysis of building structures", J. Struct. Eng., 132(11), 1721-1731. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:11(1721)
  20. Kanai, K. (1957), "Semi-empirical formula for the seismic characteristics of the ground motion", Bull. Earthq. Res. Inst. Univ. Tokyo, 35, 209-325.
  21. Landi, L., Pollioa, B. and Diotallevi, P.P. (2014), "Effectiveness of different standard and advanced pushover procedures for regular and irregular RC frames", Struct. Eng. Mech., 51(3), 433-446. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2014.51.3.433
  22. Lutes, L.D. and Sarkani, S. (2004), Random Vibrations: Analysis of Structural and Mechanical Systems, Butterworth-Heinemann.
  23. Maekawa, K. (2006), "General information for COM3", Version 9.11 in MULTI-COM, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Tokyo.
  24. Maekawa, K., Okamura, H. and Pimanmas, A. (2003), Non-linear Mechanics of Reinforced Concrete, CRC Press.
  25. Michaelov, G., Lutes, L.D. and Sarkani, S. (2001), "Extreme value of response to nonstationary excitation", J. Eng. Mech., 127(4), 352-363. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2001)127:4(352)
  26. Pour, H.G., Ansari, M. and Bayat, M. (2014), "A new lateral load pattern for pushover analysis in structures", Earthq. Struct., 6(4), 437-455. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.6.4.437
  27. Poursha, M., Khoshnoudian, F. and Moghadam, A.S. (2009), "A consecutive modal pushover procedure for estimating the seismic demands of tall buildings", Eng. Struct., 31(2), 591-599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.10.009
  28. Pre-standard, F.E.M.A. (2000), Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Report FEMA-356, SAC Joint Venture for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
  29. Reinhorn, A.M. (1997), "Inelastic analysis techniques", Proceedings of the US-Italian Workshop on Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit, USA, New York City, December.
  30. Roberts, J.B. and Spanos, P.D. (2003), Random Vibration and Statistical Linearization, Courier Corporation.
  31. Sarkar, P., Prasad, A.M. and Menon, D. (2016), "Seismic evaluation of RC stepped building frames using improved pushover analysis", Earthq. Struct., 10(4), 913-938. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.4.913
  32. Shayanfar, M.A., Ashoory, M., Bakhshpoori, T. and Farhadi, B. (2013), "Optimization of modal load pattern for pushover analysis of building structures", Struct. Eng. Mech., 47(1), 119-129. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2013.47.1.119
  33. Tajimi, H. (1960), "Statistical method of determining the maximum response of building structure during an earthquake", Proceedings of the 2nd WCEE, 2, 781-798.
  34. Tarbali, K. and Shakeri, K. (2014), "Story shear and torsional moment-based pushover procedure for asymmetric-plan buildings using an adaptive capacity spectrum method", Eng. Struct., 79, 32-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.08.006
  35. Tataie, L., Brun, M. and Reynouard, J.M. (2012), "Modal pushover procedures for seismic evaluation of reinforced concrete structures: using new nonlinear single degree of freedom systems", Eur. J. Environ. Civil Eng., 16(2), 178-203. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2012.667207
  36. Vamvatsikos, D. and Cornell, C.A. (2002), "Incremental dynamic analysis", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 31(3), 491-514. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141
  37. Wen, Y.K. (1976), "Method for random vibration of hysteretic systems", J. Eng. Mech. Div., 102(2), 249-263.

Cited by

  1. A Nonlinear Static Procedure for the Seismic Design of Symmetrical Irregular Bridges vol.2020, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8899705
  2. An energy-based approach to determine the yield force coefficient of RC frame structures vol.21, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2021.21.1.037
  3. Evaluation of seismic demands of reinforced concrete frames with steel plate shear wall vol.174, pp.11, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.18.00155