Earthquakes and Structures

  • 제14권5호
  • /
  • Pages.437-447
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2092-7614(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-7622(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Application of first-order reliability method in seismic loss assessment of structures with Endurance Time analysis

  • Basim, Mohammad Ch. (Department of Civil Engineering, Sahand University of Technology) ;
  • Estekanchi, Homayoon E. (Department of Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology) ;
  • Mahsuli, Mojtaba (Department of Civil Engineering, Sharif University of Technology)
  • 투고 : 2017.06.27
  • 심사 : 2018.03.16
  • 발행 : 2018.05.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Computational cost is one of the major obstacles for detailed risk analysis of structures. This paper puts forward a methodology for efficient probabilistic seismic loss assessment of structures using the Endurance Time (ET) analysis and the first-order reliability method (FORM). The ET analysis efficiently yields the structural responses for a continuous range of intensities through a single response-history analysis. Taking advantage of this property of ET, FORM is employed to estimate the annual rate of exceedance for the loss components. The proposed approach is an amalgamation of two analysis approaches, ET and FORM, that significantly lower the computational costs. This makes it possible to evaluate the seismic risk of complex systems. The probability distribution of losses due to the structural and non-structural damage as well as injuries and fatalities of a prototype structure are estimated using the proposed methodology. This methodology is an alternative to the prevalent risk analysis framework of the total probability theorem. Hence, the risk estimates of the proposed approach are compared with those from the total probability theorem as a benchmark. The results indicate a satisfactory agreement between the two methods while a significantly lower computational demand for the proposed approach.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. AISC360 (2010), Specification for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 360-10), American Institute of Steel Construction, Chicago-Illinois.
  2. ASCE/SEI7-10 (2010), Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, American Society of Civil Engineers.
  3. ATC-13 (1985), Earthquake Damage Evaluation Data for California, Applied Technology Council.
  4. Basim, M.C. and Estekanchi, H.E. (2015), "Application of endurance time method in performance-based optimum design of structures", Struct. Saf., 56 52-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2015.05.005
  5. Basim, M.C., Estekanchi, H.E. and Vafai, A. (2016), "A Methodology for value based seismic design of structures by the endurance time method", Scientia Iranica, 23(6), 2514-2527. https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2016.2310
  6. Cornell, C.A. and Krawinkler, H. (2000), "Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment", PEER Center News, 3(2), 1-3.
  7. Der Kiureghian, A. (2005), First-and Second-order Reliability Methods, Chapter 14 in Engineering Design Reliability Handbook, Eds. E. Nikolaidis, DM Ghiocel and S. Singhal, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
  8. Der Kiureghian, A. and Ang, A.H. (1977), "A fault-rupture model for seismic risk analysis", Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 67(4), 1173-1194.
  9. Ditlevsen, O. and Madsen, H.O. (1996), Structural Reliability Methods, Wiley New York.
  10. Elenas, A. and Meskouris, K. (2001), "Correlation study between seismic acceleration parameters and damage indices of structures", Eng. Struct., 23(6), 698-704. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(00)00074-2
  11. Estekanchi, H., Valamanesh, V. and Vafai, A. (2007), "Application of endurance time method in linear seismic analysis", Eng. Struct., 29(10), 2551-2562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.01.009
  12. Estekanchi, H.E. (2018),. Endurance Time Method website. .
  13. Estekanchi, H.E. and Basim, M.C. (2011), "Optimal damper placement in steel frames by the Endurance Time method", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 20(5), 612-630. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.689
  14. Estekanchi, H.E., Vafai, A. and Basim, M.C. (2016), "Design and assessment of seismic resilient structures by the endurance time method", Scientia Iranica, 23(4), 1648-1657. https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2016.2236
  15. Estekanchi, H.E., Vafai, A. and Sadeghazar, M. (2004), "Endurance time method for seismic analysis and design of structures", Scientia Iranica, 11(4), 361-370.
  16. FEMA-227 (1992), A Benefit-Cost Model for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Building Seismic Safety Council Washington, DC.
  17. FEMA-P-58 (2012), Seismic performance assessment of buildings, prepared by the Applied Technology Council for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
  18. FEMA-NIBS (2003), Earthquake loss estimation methodology - HAZUS technical manual, Federal Emergency Management Agency and National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington, DC.
  19. Ghosh, S. and Chakraborty, S. (2017), "Simulation based improved seismic fragility analysis of structures", Earthq. Struct., 12(5), 569-581. https://doi.org/10.12989/EAS.2017.12.5.569
  20. Gupta, A. and Krawinkler, H. (1999), Seismic Demands for Performance Evaluation of Steel Moment Resisting Frame Structures, Stanford University, The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Department of Civil Engineering.
  21. Hariri-Ardebili, M., Sattar, S. and Estekanchi, H. (2014), "Performance-based seismic assessment of steel frames using endurance time analysis", Eng. Struct., 69 216-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.03.019
  22. Haukaas, T. (2008), "Unified reliability and design optimization for earthquake engineering", Probab. Eng. Mech., 23(4), 471-481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2007.10.008
  23. Ibarra, L.F., Medina, R.A. and Krawinkler, H. (2005), "Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 34(12), 1489-1511. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.495
  24. Kiureghian, A.D. (2005), "Non‐ergodicity and PEER's framework formula", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 34(13), 1643-1652. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.504
  25. Koduru, S. and Haukaas, T. (2010), "Feasibility of FORM in finite element reliability analysis", Struct. Saf., 32(2), 145-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.10.001
  26. Lignos, D.G. and Krawinkler, H. (2011), "Deterioration modeling of steel components in support of collapse prediction of steel moment frames under earthquake loading", J. Struct. Eng., 137(11), 1291-1302. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000376
  27. Mahsuli, M. and Haukaas, T. (2013a), "Seismic risk analysis with reliability methods, part I: Models", Struct. Saf., 42 54-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2013.01.003
  28. Mahsuli, M. and Haukaas, T. (2013b), "Seismic risk analysis with reliability methods, part II: Analysis", Struct. Saf., 42 63-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2013.01.004
  29. Mahsuli, M. and Haukaas, T. (2013c), "Computer program for multimodel reliability and optimization analysis", J. Comput. Civil Eng., 27(1), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000204
  30. Mazzoni, S., McKenna, F., Scott, M.H., Fenves, G.L. and Jeremic, B. (2006), "Open system for earthquake engineering simulation (OpenSees)", Berkeley, California.
  31. Mirzaee, A. and Estekanchi, H.E. (2015), "Performance-Based Seismic Retrofitting of Steel Frames by the Endurance Time Method", Earthq. Spectra. 31(1), 383-402. https://doi.org/10.1193/081312EQS262M
  32. Mirzaee, A., Estekanchi, H.E. and Vafai, A. (2012), "Improved methodology for endurance time analysis: From time to seismic hazard return period", Scientia Iranica, 19(5), 1180-1187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scient.2012.06.023
  33. Mitropoulou, C.C., Lagaros, N.D. and Papadrakakis, M. (2010), "Building design based on energy dissipation: a critical assessment", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 8(6), 1375-1396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-010-9182-x
  34. Mitropoulou, C.C., Lagaros, N.D. and Papadrakakis, M. (2011), "Life-cycle cost assessment of optimally designed reinforced concrete buildings under seismic actions", Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., 96(10), 1311-1331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2011.04.002
  35. Moustafa, A. and Mahadevan, S. (2011), "Reliability analysis of uncertain structures using earthquake response spectra", Earthq. Struct., 2(3), 279-295. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2011.2.3.279
  36. Nozari, A. and Estekanchi, H. (2011), "Optimization of Endurance Time acceleration functions for seismic assessment of structures", Int. J. Optim. Civil Eng., 1(2), 257-277.
  37. Wen, Y. and Kang, Y. (2001a), "Minimum building life-cycle cost design criteria. I: Methodology", J. Struct. Eng., 127(3), 330-337. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:3(330)
  38. Wen, Y. and Kang, Y. (2001b), "Minimum building life-cycle cost design criteria. II: Applications", J. Struct. Eng., 127(3), 338-346. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:3(338)
  39. Yang, T.Y., Moehle, J.P. and Stojadinovic, B. (2009), Performance Evaluation of Innovative Steel Braced Frames, University of California, Berkeley.
  40. Zareian, F., Krawinkler, H., Ibarra, L. and Lignos, D. (2010), "Basic concepts and performance measures in prediction of collapse of buildings under earthquake ground motions", Struct. Des. Tall Spec. Build., 19(1‐2), 167-181. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.546

피인용 문헌

  1. Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis of Iran using reliability methods pp.1573-1456, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0498-2
  2. Optimum slip load of T-shaped friction dampers in steel frames by endurance time method vol.173, pp.10, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.18.00169
  3. Multi-objective optimum design of nonlinear viscous dampers in steel structures based on life cycle cost vol.34, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.09.100