Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of smear layer deproteinization on bonding of self-etch adhesives to dentin: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Alshaikh, Khaldoan H. (Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University) ;
  • Hamama, Hamdi H.H. (Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University) ;
  • Mahmoud, Salah H. (Department of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University)
  • Received : 2017.08.25
  • Accepted : 2018.01.20
  • Published : 2018.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this systematic review was to critically analyze previously published studies of the effects of dentin surface pretreatment with deproteinizing agents on the bonding of self-etch (SE) adhesives to dentin. Additionally, a meta-analysis was conducted to quantify the effects of the above-mentioned surface pretreatment methods on the bonding of SE adhesives to dentin. Materials and Methods: An electronic search was performed using the following databases: Scopus, PubMed and ScienceDirect. The online search was performed using the following keywords: 'dentin' or 'hypochlorous acid' or 'sodium hypochlorite' and 'self-etch adhesive.' The following categories were excluded during the assessment process: non-English articles, randomized clinical trials, case reports, animal studies, and review articles. The reviewed studies were subjected to meta-analysis to quantify the effect of the application time and concentration of sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and hypochlorous acid (HOCl) deproteinizing agents on bonding to dentin. Results: Only 9 laboratory studies fit the inclusion criteria of this systematic review. The results of the meta-analysis revealed that the pooled average microtensile bond strength values to dentin pre-treated with deproteinizing agents (15.71 MPa) was significantly lower than those of the non-treated control group (20.94 MPa). Conclusions: In light of the currently available scientific evidence, dentin surface pretreatment with deproteinizing agents does not enhance the bonding of SE adhesives to dentin. The HOCl deproteinizing agent exhibited minimal adverse effects on bonding to dentin in comparison with NaOCl solutions.

Keywords

References

  1. Jourdan M, Gagne S, Dubois-Laurent C, Maghraoui M, Huet S, Suel A, Hamama L, Briard M, Peltier D, Geoffriau E. Carotenoid content and root color of cultivated carrot: a candidate-gene association study using an original broad unstructured population. PLoS One 2015;10:e0116674. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116674
  2. Miller SA, Forrest JL. Translating evidence-based decision making into practice: appraising and applying the evidence. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2009;9:164-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2009.05.001
  3. Fuentes V, Toledano M, Osorio R, Carvalho RM. Microhardness of superficial and deep sound human dentin. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;66:850-853.
  4. Ritter AV, Eidson RS, Donovan TE. Dental caries: etiology, clinical characteristics, risk assessment, and management. In: Heymann HO, Swift EJ, Ritter AV. editors. Sturdevant's art & science of operative dentistry. 6th ed. St. Louis (MO): Elsevier Mosby; 2013. p41-88.
  5. Swift EJ, Perdigao J, Heymann HO. Bonding to enamel and dentin: a brief history and state of the art, 1995. Quintessence Int 1995;26:95-110.
  6. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003;28:215-235.
  7. Hikita K, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Ikeda T, Van Landuyt K, Maida T, Lambrechts P, Peumans M. Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 2007;23:71-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.12.002
  8. Bowen RL. Adhesive bonding of various materials to hard tooth tissues. II. Bonding to dentin promoted by a surface-active comonomer. J Dent Res 1965;44:895-902. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345650440052401
  9. Xie J, Powers JM, McGuckin RS. In vitro bond strength of two adhesives to enamel and dentin under normal and contaminated conditions. Dent Mater 1993;9:295-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(93)90046-S
  10. Reis AF, Giannini M, Kavaguchi A, Soares CJ, Line SR. Comparison of microtensile bond strength to enamel and dentin of human, bovine, and porcine teeth. J Adhes Dent 2004;6:117-121.
  11. Hamama HH, Yiu CK, Burrow MF. Effect of chemomechanical caries removal on bonding of self-etching adhesives to caries-affected dentin. J Adhes Dent 2014;16:507-516.
  12. Pashley DH. Smear layer: overview of structure and function. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1992;88:215-224.
  13. Spencer P, Ye Q, Park J, Topp EM, Misra A, Marangos O, Wang Y, Bohaty BS, Singh V, Sene F, Eslick J, Camarda K, Katz JL. Adhesive/dentin interface: the weak link in the composite restoration. Ann Biomed Eng 2010;38:1989-2003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-010-9969-6
  14. Ishioka S, Caputo AA. Interaction between the dentinal smear layer and composite bond strength. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:180-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90370-3
  15. Giachetti L, Bambi C, Scaminaci Russo D. SEM qualitative evaluation of four self-etching adhesive systems. Minerva Stomatol 2005;54:415-428.
  16. Waidyasekera K, Nikaido T, Weerasinghe DS, Ichinose S, Tagami J. Reinforcement of dentin in self-etch adhesive technology: a new concept. J Dent 2009;37:604-609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.03.021
  17. Ozer F, Blatz MB. Self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesive systems in clinical dentistry. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2013;34:12-14.
  18. Perdigao J, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Dentin adhesion and MMPs: a comprehensive review. J Esthet Restor Dent 2013;25:219-241. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12016
  19. Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater 2005;21:864-881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2005.02.003
  20. van Dijken JW, Sunnegardh-Gronberg K, Lindberg A. Clinical long-term retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. A 13 years evaluation. Dent Mater 2007;23:1101-1107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.10.005
  21. Perdigao J, Geraldeli S, Hodges JS. Total-etch versus self-etch adhesive: effect on postoperative sensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:1621-1629. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2003.0109
  22. Tay FR, King NM, Chan KM, Pashley DH. How can nanoleakage occur in self-etching adhesive systems that demineralize and infiltrate simultaneously? J Adhes Dent 2002;4:255-269.
  23. Van Landuyt KL, Mine A, De Munck J, Countinho E, Peumans M, Jaecques S, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Technique sensitivity of water-free one-step adhesives. Dent Mater 2008;24:1258-1267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.02.003
  24. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I: depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater 2001;17:296-308. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00087-7
  25. Yamauti M, Hashimoto M, Sano H, Ohno H, Carvalho RM, Kaga M, Tagami J, Oguchi H, Kubota M. Degradation of resin-dentin bonds using NaOCl storage. Dent Mater 2003;19:399-405. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00083-0
  26. Nikaido T, Takano Y, Sasafuchi Y, Burrow MF, Tagami J. Bond strengths to endodontically-treated teeth. Am J Dent 1999;12:177-180.
  27. Zehnder M, Grawehr M, Hasselgren G, Waltimo T. Tissue-dissolution capacity and dentin-disinfecting potential of calcium hydroxide mixed with irrigating solutions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;96:608-613. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(03)00157-4
  28. Taniguchi G, Nakajima M, Hosaka K, Iwamoto N, Ikeda M, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Improving the effect of NaOCl pretreatment on bonding to caries-affected dentin using self-etch adhesives. J Dent 2009;37:769-775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.06.005
  29. Montes MA, de Goes MF, Sinhoreti MA. The in vitro morphological effects of some current pre-treatments on dentin surface: a SEM evaluation. Oper Dent 2005;30:201-212.
  30. Boyde A, Jones SJ. Backscattered electron imaging of dental tissues. Anat Embryol (Berl) 1983;168:211-226. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00315817
  31. Carvalho RM, Chersoni S, Frankenberger R, Pashley DH, Prati C, Tay FR. A challenge to the conventional wisdom that simultaneous etching and resin infiltration always occurs in self-etch adhesives. Biomaterials 2005;26:1035-1042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.04.003
  32. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Altman D, Antes G, Atkins D, Barbour V, Barrowman N, Berlin JA, Clark J, Clarke M, Cook D, D'Amico R, Deeks JJ, Devereaux PJ, Dickersin K, Egger M, Ernst E, Gotzsche PC, Grimshaw J, Guyatt G, Higgins J, Ioannidis JP, Kleijnen J, Lang T, Liberati A, Magrini N, McNamee D, Moja L, Moher D, Mulrow C, Napoli M, Oxman A, Pham B, Rennie D, Sampson M, Schulz KF, Shekelle PG, Tetzlaff J, Tovey D, Tugwell P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg 2010;8:336-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007
  33. Kunawarote S, Nakajima M, Shida K, Kitasako Y, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Effect of dentin pretreatment with mild acidic HOCl solution on microtensile bond strength and surface pH. J Dent 2010;38:261-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.11.006
  34. Kunawarote S, Nakajima M, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Effect of pretreatment with mildly acidic hypochlorous acid on adhesion to caries-affected dentin using a self-etch adhesive. Eur J Oral Sci 2011;119:86-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2010.00788.x
  35. Ozturk B, Ozer F. Effect of NaOCl on bond strengths of bonding agents to pulp chamber lateral walls. J Endod 2004;30:362-365. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200405000-00013
  36. Sacramento PA, Sampaio CS, de Carvalho FG, Pascon FM, Borges AF, Alves MC, Hosoya Y, Puppin-Rontani RM. Influence of NaOCl irrigation and water-storage on degradation and microstructure of resin-dentin interface. Int J Adhes Adhes 2013;47:117-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2013.08.005
  37. Farina AP, Cecchin D, Barbizam JV, Carlini-Junior B. Influence of endodontic irrigants on bond strength of a self-etching adhesive. Aust Endod J 2011;37:26-30.
  38. Cecchin D, Farina AP, Galafassi D, Barbizam JV, Corona SA, Carlini-Junior B. Influence of sodium hypochlorite and edta on the microtensile bond strength of a self-etching adhesive system. J Appl Oral Sci 2010;18:385-389. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572010000400011
  39. Prasansuttiporn T, Nakajima M, Kunawarote S, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Effect of reducing agents on bond strength to NaOCl-treated dentin. Dent Mater 2011;27:229-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.10.007
  40. Prasansuttiporn T, Nakajima M, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Scrubbing effect of self-etching adhesives on bond strength to NaOCl-treated dentin. J Adhes Dent 2012;14:121-127.
  41. Boyde A, Switsur VR, Stewart AD. An assessment of two new physical methods applied to the study of dental tissues. Arch Oral Biol 1962;7 Supplement:185-193.
  42. Eick JD, Wilko RA, Anderson CH, Sorensen SE. Scanning electron microscopy of cut tooth surfaces and identification of debris by use of the electron microprobe. J Dent Res 1970;49:1359-1368. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345700490063601
  43. Perdigao J, Lopes M, Geraldeli S, Lopes GC, Garcia-Godoy F. Effect of a sodium hypochlorite gel on dentin bonding. Dent Mater 2000;16:311-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00021-X
  44. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Kaga M, Sano H, Endo K, Oguchi H. The extent to which resin can infiltrate dentin by acetone-based adhesives. J Dent Res 2002;81:74-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/002203450208100116
  45. Chan KM, Tay FR, King NM, Imazato S, Pashley DH. Bonding of mild self-etching primers/adhesives to dentin with thick smear layers. Am J Dent 2003;16:340-346.
  46. Spencer P, Wang Y. Adhesive phase separation at the dentin interface under wet bonding conditions. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;62:447-456. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.10364
  47. Wang Y, Spencer P. Hybridization efficiency of the adhesive/dentin interface with wet bonding. J Dent Res 2003;82:141-145. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910308200213
  48. De Munck J, Vargas M, Iracki J, Van Landuyt K, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. One-day bonding effectiveness of new self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Oper Dent 2005;30:39-49.
  49. Boyde A. Methodology of calcified tissue specimen preparation for scanning electron microscopy. In: Dickson GR, editor. Methods of calcified tissue preparation. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1984. p251-307.
  50. Fawzy AS, Amer MA, El-Askary FS. Sodium hypochlorite as dentin pretreatment for etch-and-rinse single-bottle and two-step self-etching adhesives: atomic force microscope and tensile bond strength evaluation. J Adhes Dent 2008;10:135-144.
  51. Wang L, Bassiri M, Najafi R, Najafi K, Yang J, Khosrovi B, Hwong W, Barati E, Belisle B, Celeri C, Robson MC. Hypochlorous acid as a potential wound care agent: part I. Stabilized hypochlorous acid: a component of the inorganic armamentarium of innate immunity. J Burns Wounds 2007;6:e5.
  52. Vargas MA, Cobb DS, Armstrong SR. Resin-dentin shear bond strength and interfacial ultrastructure with and without a hybrid layer. Oper Dent 1997;22:159-166.
  53. Prati C, Chersoni S, Pashley DH. Effect of removal of surface collagen fibrils on resin-dentin bonding. Dent Mater 1999;15:323-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00052-4
  54. Saboia VP, Rodrigues AL, Pimenta LA. Effect of collagen removal on shear bond strength of two single-bottle adhesive systems. Oper Dent 2000;25:395-400.
  55. Lai SC, Mak YF, Cheung GS, Osorio R, Toledano M, Carvalho RM, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Reversal of compromised bonding to oxidized etched dentin. J Dent Res 2001;80:1919-1924. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345010800101101
  56. Morris MD, Lee KW, Agee KA, Bouillaguet S, Pashley DH. Effects of sodium hypochlorite and RC-prep on bond strengths of resin cement to endodontic surfaces. J Endod 2001;27:753-757. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200112000-00010
  57. Hawkins CL, Davies MJ. Hypochlorite-induced oxidation of proteins in plasma: formation of chloramines and nitrogen-centred radicals and their role in protein fragmentation. Biochem J 1999;340:539-548. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj3400539
  58. Rueggeberg FA, Margeson DH. The effect of oxygen inhibition on an unfilled/filled composite system. J Dent Res 1990;69:1652-1658. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345900690100501
  59. Mountouris G, Silikas N, Eliades G. Effect of sodium hypochlorite treatment on the molecular composition and morphology of human coronal dentin. J Adhes Dent 2004;6:175-182.
  60. Vongphan N, Senawongse P, Somsiri W, Harnirattisai C. Effects of sodium ascorbate on microtensile bond strength of total-etching adhesive system to NaOCl treated dentine. J Dent 2005;33:689-695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2005.01.008
  61. Hiraishi N, Kitasako Y, Nikaido T, Nomura S, Burrow MF, Tagami J. Effect of artificial saliva contamination on pH value change and dentin bond strength. Dent Mater 2003;19:429-434. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00087-8
  62. Haapasalo M, Qian W. Irrigants and intracanal medicaments. In: Ingle JI, Bakland L, Baumgartner J, editors. Ingle's endodontics. 6th ed. Hamilton: BC Decker; 2008. p992-1018.
  63. Inoue S, Murata Y, Sano H, Kashiwada T. Effect of NaOCl treatment on bond strength between indirect resin core-buildup and dentin. Dent Mater J 2002;21:343-354. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.21.343
  64. Pioch T, Kobaslija S, Schagen B, Gotz H. Interfacial micromorphology and tensile bond strength of dentin bonding systems after NaOCl treatment. J Adhes Dent 1999;1:135-142.
  65. de Castro AK, Hara AT, Pimenta LA. Influence of collagen removal on shear bond strength of one-bottle adhesive systems in dentin. J Adhes Dent 2000;2:271-277.
  66. Mainnemare A, Megarbane B, Soueidan A, Daniel A, Chapple IL. Hypochlorous acid and taurine-N-monochloramine in periodontal diseases. J Dent Res 2004;83:823-831. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408301101
  67. Christensen CE, McNeal SF, Eleazer P. Effect of lowering the pH of sodium hypochlorite on dissolving tissue in vitro. J Endod 2008;34:449-452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2008.01.001
  68. Guentzel JL, Liang Lam K, Callan MA, Emmons SA, Dunham VL. Reduction of bacteria on spinach, lettuce, and surfaces in food service areas using neutral electrolyzed oxidizing water. Food Microbiol 2008;25:36-41.
  69. Mishra P, Palamara JE, Tyas MJ, Burrow MF. Effect of static loading of dentin beams at various pH levels. Calcif Tissue Int 2006;79:416-421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-005-0271-9
  70. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JP, Rothstein HR. Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2009.

Cited by

  1. Effect of Papain and Bromelain Enzymes on Shear Bond Strength of Composite to Superficial Dentin in Different Adhesive Systems vol.20, pp.9, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2646
  2. Influence of Dentine Pre-Treatment by Sandblasting with Aluminum Oxide in Adhesive Restorations. An In Vitro Study vol.13, pp.13, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13133026
  3. Bis[2-(Methacryloyloxy) Ethyl] Phosphate as a Primer for Enamel and Dentine vol.100, pp.10, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345211023477