대한화학회지 (Journal of the Korean Chemical Society)

  • 제62권3호
  • /
  • Pages.243-252
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1017-2548(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-8530(eISSN)
대한화학회 (Korean Chemical Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

물질의 특성에 대한 중학생의 거시적 개념과 미시적 개념의 비교

A Comparison of Middle School Students' Macroscopic and Microscopic Conceptions Related to the Properties of Substances

  • Lee, Jaewon (Department of Chemistry Education, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Byoungjin (Department of Chemistry Education, Seoul National University) ;
  • Noh, Taehee (Department of Chemistry Education, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2018.01.03
  • 심사 : 2018.04.17
  • 발행 : 2018.06.20
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구에서는 중학교 2학년 학생들의 물질의 특성에 대한 거시적, 미시적 수준의 개념을 비교하였다. 기초 입자 개념 검사와 녹는점, 용해도, 밀도 개념에 대한 거시적, 미시적 수준의 개념 검사를 개발하여 371명의 중학생들을 대상으로 실시하였다. 학생들의 응답을 거시적 수준과 미시적 수준의 개념 이해 여부에 따라 네 가지로 범주화하고 범주별 비율과 특징을 분석하였다. 연구 결과, 거시적 수준의 개념을 이해한 학생들은 미시적 수준에서 다양한 오개념을 가지고 있는 경우가 많았다. 많은 학생들은 물질의 특성과 관련한 미시적 수준의 개념뿐 아니라 거시적 수준의 개념 이해에도 어려움을 겪었다. 거시적 수준의 개념을 이해하지 못한 학생들은 대부분 미시적 수준에서 거시적 수준의 응답과 일치하는 응답을 하지 못하였다. 기초 입자 개념 문항에 옳은 응답을 한 학생들도 물질의 특성 관련 개념을 이해하는 데 어려움을 겪었으나, 거시적 수준의 개념을 이해한 경우 미시적 수준의 개념도 함께 이해한 비율이 높았다. 연구 결과를 바탕으로 물질의 특성 관련 개념의 효과적인 교수학습 및 향후 교육과정의 개선을 위한 교육적 시사점을 논의하였다.

In this study, we compared 8th graders' macroscopic and microscopic conceptions related to the properties of substances. A test for the basic particle concept and a test for the macroscopic and microscopic concepts of melting point, solubility, and density were developed and administered to 371 students. Their responses were classified into 4 categories on the bases of their understanding of the macroscopic and microscopic concepts. The proportions and characteristics of each category were also analyzed. The analyses of the results revealed that the students who understood the macroscopic concepts had various misconceptions at the microscopic level. Many students had difficulty in understanding not only microscopic concepts but macroscopic concepts. The microscopic responses of the students who did not understand the macroscopic concepts hardly corresponded with their macroscopic level responses. The students who responded correctly to the test for the basic particle concept also had difficulty in understanding the concept of the properties of substances. When they understood the macroscopic concepts, the proportions of the students who understood the microscopic concepts were high. On the bases of the results, educational implications for effective teaching and learning of concepts related to the properties of substances and for improving the future national curricular are discussed.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Park, H.; Son, Y.-A. Journal of Education & Culture 2017, 23, 281. https://doi.org/10.24159/joec.2017.23.1.281
  2. Koh, Y.-S.; Kim, H.-N. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2016, 36, 203. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.2.0203
  3. Ainsworth, S. In Visualization: Theory and Practice in Science Education; Gilbert, J. K., Reimer, M., Nakhleh, M., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2008.
  4. Yoon, H.; Lee, Y. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society 2014, 58, 580. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2014.58.6.580
  5. Johnstone, A. H. Education in Chemistry 1999, 36, 45.
  6. Noh, T.; Lee, J.; Yang, C.; Kang, S.; Kang, H. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2016, 36, 295. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.2.0295
  7. Stevens, S. Y.; Delgado, C.; Krajcik, J. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2010, 47, 687.
  8. Merritt, J.; Krajcik, J. In Concepts of Matter in Science Education; Tsaparlis, G., Sevian, H., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2013.
  9. Bunce, D. M.; Gabel, D. L. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2002, 39, 911. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10056
  10. Harrison, A. G.; Treagust, D. F. In Chemical Education: Towards Research-based Practice; Gilbert, J. K., De Jong, O., Justi, R., Treagust, D. F., Van Driel, J. H., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Press: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2002.
  11. Sanger, M. J. Journal of Chemical Education 2000, 77, 762. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed077p762
  12. Singer, J. E.; Tal, R. T.; Wu, H.-K. School Science and Mathematics 2003, 103, 28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2003.tb18111.x
  13. Lee, S. K.; Kim, S.-Y. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2011, 35, 68.
  14. Park, J.; Park, Y.; Kang, S. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society 2013, 57, 640. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2013.57.5.640
  15. Ebenezer, J. V.; Erickson, G. L. Science Education 1996, 80, 181. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199604)80:2<181::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-C
  16. Taber, K. S. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 2001, 2, 123. https://doi.org/10.1039/B1RP90014E
  17. Duschl, R.; Maeng, S.; Sezen, A. Studies in Science Education 2011, 47, 123. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2011.604476
  18. NGSS Lead States. In Next Generation Science Standards: For States, by States; The National Academies Press: Washington D.C., US, 2013.
  19. Cole, M. L. Spatial reasoning and understanding the particulate nature of matter: A middle school perspective, Doctoral dissertation. University of Kentucky, Kentucky, US, 2017.
  20. Department of Education. In Science Programmes of Study: Key Stage 3. National Curriculum in England; Department of Education: London, England, 2013.
  21. Kim, D.; Kim, H. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education 2012, 31, 164.
  22. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology. In 2009 Revised National Curriculum of Science; Ministry of Education, Science and Technology: Seoul, 2011.
  23. Cachapuz, A.; Paixao, F. In Rethinking Science and Technology Education to Meet the Demands for Future Generations in a Changing World; Proceedings of the International Organization for Science and Technology Education (IOSTE) Xth symposium, Bizzo, N., Kawasaky, C. S., Ferracioli, L., Rosa, V. L., Eds.; Parana, Brazil, 2002.
  24. Hur, M.-Y.; Jeon, H.-S.; Paik, S.-H. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society 2008, 52, 73. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2008.52.1.073
  25. Kang, D.-H.; Paik, S.-H.; Park, K.-T. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society 2004, 48, 399. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2004.48.4.399
  26. Park, J.; Han, S.; Noh, T. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2010, 30, 42.
  27. Yoo, S. A.; Koo, I. S.; Kim, B. G.; Kang, D. H. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society 1999, 43, 564.
  28. Yoon, H.; Woo, A. J. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction 2007, 11, 567. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2007.11.2.567
  29. Maeng, S.; Seong, Y.; Jang, S. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2013, 33, 161. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.1.161
  30. Shin, N.; Koh, E. J.; Choi, C. I.; Jeong, D. H. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2014, 34, 437. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.5.0437
  31. Lee, O.; Eichinger, D. C.; Anderson, C. W.; Berkheimer, G. D.; Blakeslee, T. D. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1993, 30, 249. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660300304
  32. Driver, R. In Children's Ideas in Science; Driver, R., Guesne, E., Tiberghien, A., Eds.; Open University Press: Milton Keynes, England, 1985.
  33. Kang, S.; Bang, D.; Kim, S.-J. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society 2012, 56, 518. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2012.56.4.518
  34. Kang, S.; Bang, D.; Kim, S.-J. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society 2012, 56, 739. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2012.56.6.739
  35. Gabel, D. L. Journal of Chemical Education 1993, 70, 193. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed070p193
  36. Wilson, M. Constructing Measures: An Item Responses Modeling Approach; Routledge: New Jersey, US, 2004.

피인용 문헌

  1. 반응적 교수법에 의한 고등학교 1학년 학생들의 질량 보존과 부피 변화에 대한 사고 변화 분석 vol.64, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2020.64.5.304