References
- Berland, L. K., & McNeill, K. L. (2012). For whom is argument and explanation a necessary distinction? A reponse to osborne and patterson. Science Education, 93(1), 26-55
- Berland, L. K., & Reiser, B. J. (2009). Making sense of argumentation and explanation. Science Education, 93(1), 26-55. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20286
- Cavallo, A. M. L. (1996). Meaningful learning, reasoning ability, and students' understanding and problem solving of topics in genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(6), 625-656. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199608)33:6<625::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-Q
- Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
- Duschl, R., & Osborne, J. (2008). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38(1), 39-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260208560187
- Erduran, S., & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P. (Eds.). (2008). Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
- Hammer, D., & Elby, A. (2002). On the form of a personal epistemology. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 169-190). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Jeong, W. H. & Cha, H. Y. (1994). High school students’ misconceptions on genetics and evolution. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 14(2), 170-183.
- Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P.,(2014). Determinism and underdetermination in genetics: Implications for students' engagement in argumentation and epistemic practice. Science & Education, 23(2), 465-484. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9561-6
- Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., Rodriguez, A. B., & Duschl, R. (2000). "Doing the lesson" or "Doing science": Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84(6), 757-792. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<757::AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-F
- Karagoz, M., & Cakir, M. (2011). Problem Solving in Genetics: Conceptual and Procedural Difficulties. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 11(3), 1668-1674.
- Kargbo, D. B., Hobbs, E. D., & Erickson, G. L. (1980). Children’s beilefs about inherited chracteristics. Journal of Biological Education, 14(2), 137-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.1980.10668980
- Kelly, G. J., Regev, J., & Prothero, W. (2008). Analysis of lines of reasoning in written argumentation. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jimenez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research(pp. 137-157). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
- Kim, M., Anthony, R., & Blades, D. (2014). Decision making through dialogue: a case study of analyzing preservice teachers’ argumentation on socioscientific issues. Research in Science Education, 44(6), 903-926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9407-0
- Lee, H.-S., Liu, O. L., Pallant, A., Roohr, K. C., Pryputniewicz, S., & Buck, Z. E. (2014). Assessment of uncertainty-infused science argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(5), 581-605. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21147
- Lewis, J., & Wood-Robinson, C. (2000). Genes, chromosomes, cell division and inheritance-Do students see any relationship? International Journal of Science Education, 22(2), 177-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900289949
- Linn, M. C., Songer, N. B., & Eylon, B. S. (1996). Shifts and convergences in science learning and instruction. In R. Calfee and D. Berliner (Eds.), Handbook of educational psycho[ogy. New York: Macmillan.
- McNeill, K. L. (2008). Teachers' use of curriculum to support students in writing scientific arguments to explain phenomena. Science Education, 93(2), 233-268. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20294
- McNeill, K. L. (2011). Elementary students' views of explanation, argumentation and evidence and abilities to construct arguments over the school year. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(7), 793-823. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20430
- McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Synergy between teacher practices and curricular scaffolds to support students in using domain-specific and domain-general knowledge in writing arguments to explain phenomena. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(3), 416-460. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400903013488
- National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- Nielson(2013). Dialectical Features of Students' Argumentation: A critical review of argumentation studies in science education. Research in Science Education, 43(1), 371-393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9266-x
- Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994-1020. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20035
- Osborne, J. F., Hendetson, J. B., Szu, E., Wild, A., & Yao, S. Y. (2016). The development and validation of a learning progression for argumentation in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(6), 821-846. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21316
- Piaget, J. (1953). The origin of intelligence in the child. London: Routledge & Kegan.
- Sandoval, W. A. (2003). Conceptual and epistemic aspects of students' scientific explanations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(1), 5-51. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1201_2
- Sandoval, W. A. (2005). Understanding students’ practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89(4), 634-656. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20065
- Sandoval, W. A., & Cam, A. (2011). Elementary children's judgments of the epistemic status of sources of justification. Science Education, 95(3), 383-408. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20426
- Sandoval, W. A., & Millwood, K. A. (2005). The quality of students'' use of evidence in written scientific explanations. Cognition and Instruction, 23(1), 23-55. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2301_2
- Stevens, R., Wineburg, S., Herrenkohl, L. R., & Bell, P. (2005). Comparative understanding of school subjects: Past, present, and future. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 125-157. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075002125
- Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
- van Eemeren, F. H., Grootendorst, R., Henkemans, F. S., Blair, J. A., Johnson, R. H., Krabbe, E. C. W., Plantin, C., Walton, D. N., Willard, C. A., Woods, J., & Zarefsky, D. (1996). Fundamentals of argumentation theory: A handbook of historical backgrounds and contemporary developments. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10008