References
- Albe, V. (2008). When scientific knowledge, daily life experience, epistemological and social considerations intersect: Students' argumentation in group discussions on a socio-scientific issue. Research in Science Education, 38(1), 67-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9040-2
- Chang, S., & Chiu, M. (2008). Lakatos’ scientific research programmes as a framework for analysing informal argumentation about socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 30(13), 1753-1773. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701534582
- Clark, D. B., & Sampson, V. (2008). Assessing dialogic argumentation in online environments to relate structure, grounds, and conceptual quality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(3), 293-321. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20216
- Erduran, S. (2007). Methodological foundations in the study of argumentation in science classrooms. In Erduran, S., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P. (Eds.), Argumentation in science education (pp. 47-69). Dordrecht, NL: Springer.
- Evagorou, M., & Osborne, J. (2013). Exploring young students’ collaborative argumentation within a socioscientific issue. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(2), 209-237. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21076
- Halverson, K. L., Siegel, M. A., & Freyermuth, S. K. (2009). Lenses for framing decisions: Undergraduates’ decision making about stem cell research. International Journal of Science Education, 31(9), 1249-1268. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802178123
- Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1994). The pro-con cooperative group strategy: Structuring academic controversy within the social studies classroom. In Stahl, R. J. (Ed.), Cooperative learning in social studies: A handbook for teachers (pp. 306-331). Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
- Kim, M., Anthony, R., & Blades, D. (2014). Decision making through dialogue: A case study of analyzing preservice teachers’ argumentation on socioscientific issues. Research in Science Education, 44(6), 903-926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-014-9407-0
- Ko, H. (2009). A study of a thinking process in elementary school student by applying the issues-centered cooperative learning model. Social Studies Education, 48(3), 57-73.
- Ko, Y., Choi, Y., & Lee, H. (2015). Development of an analytical framework for dialogic argumentation in the context of socioscientific issues: Based on discourse clusters and schemes. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(3), 509-521. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.3.0509
- Ko, Y., & Shin, W. (2011) An analysis of discussion using online discussion forum and smart phone. The Korea Educational Review, 17(3), 129-150.
- Kolsto, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85(3), 291-310. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1011
- Kwon, H., Kim, M., Kim, S., & Noh, T. (2017). The patterns of analogy change and the characteristics of discussions in collaborative activity of self-generated analogy. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(3), 407-416. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2017.37.3.407
- Lee, H., & Chang, H. (2012). Patterns of pre-service science teachers’ use of evidence in web-based discussions of the nuclear power generation issue. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 62(4), 364-373. https://doi.org/10.3938/NPSM.62.364
- Lee, H., Choi, Y., & Ko, Y. (2014). Designing collective intelligence-based instructional models for teaching socioscientific issues. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(6), 523-534. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.6.0523
- Lee, E., Lee, E., & Chung, Y. (2016). Effects of socioscientific issues (SSI) programs on enhancing high school students' moral judgement and SSI reasoning skills. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 16(8), 219-237.
- Millar, R. (2006). Twenty first century science: Insights from the design and implementation of a scientific literacy approach in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(13), 1499-1521. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600718344
- Ministry of Education (2015). 2015 revised national curriculum of science. Seoul: Ministry of Education.
- Nam, H., Kang, H., & Noh, T. (2017). Features of using smart devices in socioscientific issues debate classes. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(5), 787-797. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2017.37.5.787
- Oh, S., & Jonassen, D. H. (2007). Scaffolding online argumentation during problem solving. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(2), 95-110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00206.x
- Park, J.-Y., & Kim, H.-B. (2011). Analyzing group interaction process of pre-service elementary school teachers' argumentation on socio-scientific issues. Biology Education, 39(4), 653-673. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2011.39.4.653
- Park, J.-Y., & Kim, H.-B. (2012). Theoretical considerations on analytical framework design for the interactions between participants in group argumentation on socio-scientific issues. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(4), 604-624. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.4.604
- Patronis, T., Potari, D., & Spiliotopoulou, V. (1999). Students' argumentation in decision making on a socio-scientific issue: Implications for teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 21(7), 745-754. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006999290408
- Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry?. Research in Science Education, 37(4), 371-391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9030-9
- Sadler, T. D., Chambers, F. W., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). Student conceptualizations of the nature of science in response to a socioscientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 387-409. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000119456
- Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). The morality of socioscientific issues: Construal and resolution of genetic engineering dilemmas. Science Education, 88(1), 4-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10101
- Yang, C., Kim, S., Jo, M., & Noh, T. (2016). The characteristics of group and classroom discussions in the scientific modeling of the particulate model of matter. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(3), 361-369. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.3.0361
- Zeidler, D. L., & Kahn, S. (2014). It's debatable!: Using socioscientific issues to develop scientific literacy. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
- Zeidler, D. L., & Keefer, M. (2003). The role of moral reasoning and the status of socioscientific issues in science education. In Zeidler, D. L. (Ed), The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education (pp. 7-38). Dordrecht, NL: Springer.
- Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socio-scientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357-377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048
- Zeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., Ackett, W. A., & Simmons, M. L. (2002). Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Science Education, 86(3), 343-367. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10025
Cited by
- 초등 예비교사의 대체에너지에 대한 이해도와 대안개념 분석 vol.40, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2021.40.1.36