Nuclear Engineering and Technology

Korean Nuclear Society (한국원자력학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Radiotoxicity flux and concentration as complementary safety indicators for the safety assessment of a rock-cavern type LILW repository

  • Jo, Yongheum (Department of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering, KAIST) ;
  • Han, Sol-Chan (Department of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering, KAIST) ;
  • Ok, Soon-Il (Korea Radioactive Waste Agency) ;
  • Choi, Seonggyu (Department of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering, KAIST) ;
  • Yun, Jong-Il (Department of Nuclear and Quantum Engineering, KAIST)
  • Received : 2018.03.26
  • Accepted : 2018.07.23
  • Published : 2018.12.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study presents a practical application of complementary safety indicators, which can be applied in a safety assessment of a radioactive waste repository by excluding a biosphere simulation and comparing the artificial radiation originating from the repository with the background natural radiation. Complementary safety indicators (radiotoxicity flux from geosphere and radiotoxicity concentration in seawater) were applied in the safety assessment of a rock-cavern type low and intermediate level radioactive waste (LILW) repository in the Republic of Korea. The natural radionuclide ($^{40}K$, $^{226,228}Ra$, $^{232}Th$, and $^{234,235,238}U$) concentrations in the groundwater and seawater at the Gyeongju LILW repository site were measured. Based on the analyzed concentrations of natural radionuclides, the levels of natural radiation were determined to be $8.6{\times}10^{-5}$ - $8.0{\times}10^{-4}Sv/m^2/yr$ and $6.95{\times}10^{-5}Sv/m^3$ for radiotoxicity flux from the geosphere and radiotoxicity concentration in seawater, respectively. From simulation results obtained using a Goldsim-based safety assessment model, it was determined that the radiotoxicity of radionuclides released from the repository is lower than that of the natural radionuclides inherently present in the natural waters. The applicability of the complementary safety indicators to the safety case was discussed with regard to reduction of the uncertainty associated with biosphere simulations, and communication with the public.

Keywords

References

  1. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Safety Indicators in Different Time Frames for the Safety Assessment of Underground Radioactive Waste Repositories, IAEA-TECDOC-767, IAEA, Vienna, 1994.
  2. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Natural Activity Concentrations and Fluxes as Indicators for the Safety Assessment of Radioactive Waste Disposal, IAEA-TECDOC-1464, IAEA, Vienna, 2005.
  3. S.D. Hahn, SST warming of Korean coastal waters during 1881-1990, KODC Newsletter 24 (1994) 29-37.
  4. S. Kim, C.-I. Zhang, J.-Y. Kim, J.-H. Oh, S. Kang, J.B. Lee, Climate variability and its effects on major fisheries in Korea, Ocean Sci. J. 42 (2007) 179-192. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03020922
  5. Statistics Korea, Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2018, Available at: http://kosis.kr/statHtml/statHtml.do?orgId-117&tblId-DT_11702_N021&conn_path-I2 (Accessed 24 July 2018).
  6. Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA), Post-closure Safety Case for Geological Repositories - Nature and Purpose, NEA No. 3679, OECD/NEA, Paris, 2004.
  7. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Safety Indicators for the Safety Assessment of Radioactive Waste Disposal, IAEA-TECDOC-1372, IAEA, Vienna, 2003.
  8. D.-A. Becker, D. Buhmann, R. Storck, J. Alonso, J.-L. Cormenzana, M. Hugi, F. van Gemert, P. O'Sullivan, A. Laciok, J. Marivoet, X. Sillen, H. Nordman, T. Vieno, M. Niemeyer, Testing of Safety and Performance Indicators (SPIN), European Commission Report EUR 19965 EN, European Commission, Brussels, 2003.
  9. D.-A. Becker, J.-L. Cormenzana, A. Delos, L. Duro, J. Grupa, J. Hart, J. Landa, J. Marivoet, L. Orzechowski, T.-J. Schroder, A. Vokal, J. Weber, E. Weetjens, J. Wolf, Performance Assessment Methodologies in Application to Guide the Development of the Safety Case - Safety Indicators and Performance Indicators, PAMINA Deliverable 3.4.2, Braunschweig, 2009.
  10. K.W. Park, S.-H. Ji, C.S. Kim, K.S. Kim, J.Y. Kim, Numerical simulation of groundwater flow in LILW repository site: I. Groundwater flow modeling, J. Kor. Rad. Waste Soc. 6 (4) (2008) 265-282.
  11. K.W. Park, S.-H. Ji, Y.K. Koh, G.Y. Kim, J.K. Kim, Numerical simulation of groundwater flow in LILW repository site: II. Input parameters for safety assessment, J. Kor. Rad. Waste Soc. 6 (4) (2008) 283-296.
  12. American Public Health Association (APHA), Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, twenty first ed., American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, 2005.
  13. International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), Nuclear Instrumentation - Measurement of Gamma-ray Emission Rates of Radionuclides - Calibration and Use of Germanium Spectrometers, IEC 61452:1995, IEC, Geneva, 1995.
  14. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), HASL-300 Method U-04-RC: Uranium in biological and environmental materials, Manual of Standard Procedures, twenty eighth ed., U.S. DOE, New York, 1997.
  15. S.-C. Han, Interdependent Safety Assessment of Integrated Low-and Intermediate Radioactive Waste Disposal System in the Republic of Korea, 2015. Master's Thesis (in Korean), KAIST.
  16. Goldsim Technology Group LLC, User's guide of Goldsim contaminant transport module, Version 7.0. http://www.goldsim.com, 2017.
  17. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), Compendium of Dose Coefficients Based on ICRP Publication 60, ICRP Publication 119. Ann. ICRP 41(Suppl.), Pergamon Press, Oxford, 2012.
  18. J. Hart, T.J. Schroder, ENGAGED Recommended Reference Values for the OPERA Safety Assessment, OPERA-PU-NRG1222, 2017.
  19. K. Miyahara, T. Kato, Illustration of HLW repository performance: using alternative yardsticks to assess modeled radionuclide fluxes, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 1107 (2008) 673-680.
  20. J. Wolf, A. Rubel, U. Noseck, D. Becker, Safety and Performance Indicators for Repositories in Salt and Clay Formations, GRS-240, Gesellschaft fuer Anlagenund Reaktorsicherheit (GRS) mbH, Koln, 2008.
  21. K.I. Jung, J.H. Kim, M.J. Kwon, M.S. Jeong, S.W. Hong, J.B. Park, Comprehensive development plans for the low- and intermediate-level radioactive waste disposal facility in Korea and preliminary safety assessment, J. Nucl. Fuel Cycle Waste Technol. 14 (4) (2016) 385-410. https://doi.org/10.7733/jnfcwt.2016.14.4.385
  22. Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA), Indicators in the Safety Case - a Report of the Integrated Group on the Safety Case (IGSC), NEA/RWM/R (2012)7, OECD/NEA, Paris, 2012.