참고문헌
- Verberg MF, Eijkemans MJ, Macklon NS, Heijnen EM, Baart EB, Hohmann FP, et al. The clinical significance of the retrieval of a low number of oocytes following mild ovarian stimulation for IVF: a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2009;15:5-12.
- Sunkara SK, Rittenberg V, Raine-Fenning N, Bhattacharya S, Zamora J, Coomarasamy A. Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: an analysis of 400 135 treatment cycles. Hum Reprod 2011;26:1768-74. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der106
- Sunkara SK, La Marca A, Seed PT, Khalaf Y. Increased risk of preterm birth and low birthweight with very high number of oocytes following IVF: an analysis of 65 868 singleton live birth outcomes. Hum Reprod 2015;30:1473-80. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev076
- Popovic-Todorovic B, Loft A, Lindhard A, Bangsboll S, Andersson AM, Andersen AN. A prospective study of predictive factors of ovarian response in 'standard' IVF/ICSI patients treated with recombinant FSH: a suggestion for a recombinant FSH dosage normogram. Hum Reprod 2003;18:781-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deg181
- Howles CM, Saunders H, Alam V, Engrand P; FSH Treatment Guidelines Clinical Panel. Predictive factors and a corresponding treatment algorithm for controlled ovarian stimulation in patients treated with recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (follitropin alfa) during assisted reproduction technology (ART) procedures: an analysis of 1378 patients. Curr Med Res Opin 2006;22:907-18. https://doi.org/10.1185/030079906X104678
- Ledger WL. Clinical utility of measurement of anti-Mullerian hormone in reproductive endocrinology. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010;95:5144-54. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2010-0701
- Al-Azemi M, Killick SR, Duffy S, Pye C, Refaat B, Hill N, et al. Multimarker assessment of ovarian reserve predicts oocyte yield after ovulation induction. Hum Reprod 2011;26:414-22. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deq339
- Lan VT, Linh NK, Tuong HM, Wong PC, Howles CM. Anti-Mullerian hormone versus antral follicle count for defining the starting dose of FSH. Reprod Biomed Online 2013;27:390-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.07.008
- Moon KY, Kim H, Lee JY, Lee JR, Jee BC, Suh CS, et al. Nomogram to predict the number of oocytes retrieved in controlled ovarian stimulation. Clin Exp Reprod Med 2016;43:112-8. https://doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2016.43.2.112
- La Marca A, Papaleo E, Grisendi V, Argento C, Giulini S, Volpe A. Development of a nomogram based on markers of ovarian reserve for the individualisation of the follicle-stimulating hormone starting dose in in vitro fertilisation cycles. BJOG 2012;119:1171-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03412.x
- Polyzos NP, Drakopoulos P, Parra J, Pellicer A, Tournaye H, Bosch E, et al. Cumulative live birth rates following the first ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI: a European multicenter analysis of -15,000 women using individual patient data. Hum Reprod 2017;32(Suppl 1):i79.
- Magnusson A, Kallen K, Thurin-Kjellberg A, Bergh C. The number of oocytes retrieved during IVF: a balance between efficacy and safety. Hum Reprod 2018;33:58-64. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dex334
- Allegra A, Marino A, Volpes A, Coffaro F, Scaglione P, Gullo S, et al. A randomized controlled trial investigating the use of a predictive nomogram for the selection of the FSH starting dose in IVF/ICSI cycles. Reprod Biomed Online 2017;34:429-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.01.012
- Bonifacio M, Bradley CK, Karia S, Livingstone M, Bowman MC, McArthur SJ. The original Beckman Coulter Generation II assay significantly underestimates AMH levels compared with the revised protocol. J Assist Reprod Genet 2015;32:1691-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-015-0579-y
- Li HW, Ng EH, Wong BP, Anderson RA, Ho PC, Yeung WS. Correlation between three assay systems for anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) determination. J Assist Reprod Genet 2012;29:1443-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-012-9880-1
- Olivennes F, Howles CM, Borini A, Germond M, Trew G, Wikland M, et al. Individualizing FSH dose for assisted reproduction using a novel algorithm: the CONSORT study. Reprod Biomed Online 2009;18:195-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60256-8
- Nyboe Andersen A, Nelson SM, Fauser BC, Garcia-Velasco JA, Klein BM, Arce JC, et al. Individualized versus conventional ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: a multicenter, randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded, phase 3 noninferiority trial. Fertil Steril 2017;107:387-96.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.10.033
- van Tilborg TC, Oudshoorn SC, Eijkemans MJ, Mochtar MH, van Golde RJ, Hoek A, et al. Individualized FSH dosing based on ovarian reserve testing in women starting IVF/ICSI: a multicentre trial and cost-effectiveness analysis. Hum Reprod 2017;32:2485-95. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dex321
- van Tilborg TC, Torrance HL, Oudshoorn SC, Eijkemans MJ, Koks CA, Verhoeve HR, et al. Individualized versus standard FSH dosing in women starting IVF/ICSI: an RCT. Part 1: the predicted poor responder. Hum Reprod 2017;32:2496-505. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dex318
- Papaleo E, Zaffagnini S, Munaretto M, Vanni VS, Rebonato G, Grisendi V, et al. Clinical application of a nomogram based on age, serum FSH and AMH to select the FSH starting dose in IVF/ICSI cycles: a retrospective two-centres study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016;207:94-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.10.021
- Roque M, Lattes K, Serra S, Sola I, Geber S, Carreras R, et al. Fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2013;99:156-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.003
- Sterrenburg MD, Veltman-Verhulst SM, Eijkemans MJ, Hughes EG, Macklon NS, Broekmans FJ, et al. Clinical outcomes in relation to the daily dose of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone for ovarian stimulation in in vitro fertilization in presumed normal responders younger than 39 years: a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2011;17:184-96. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmq041
- Popovic-Todorovic B, Loft A, Ziebe S, Andersen AN. Impact of recombinant FSH dose adjustments on ovarian response in the second treatment cycle with IVF or ICSI in “standard” patients treated with 150 IU/day during the first cycle. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004;83:842-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0001-6349.2004.00573.x
- Jayaprakasan K, Hopkisson J, Campbell B, Johnson I, Thornton J, Raine-Fenning N. A randomised controlled trial of 300 versus 225 IU recombinant FSH for ovarian stimulation in predicted normal responders by antral follicle count. BJOG 2010;117:853-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02545.x