한국조경학회지 (Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture)

  • 제46권2호
  • /
  • Pages.37-51
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1225-1755(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-9566(eISSN)
한국조경학회 (The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

근린 생활권 공원에서의 자발적 공동체 활동의 활성화 요인에 관한 연구 - 세종시 '참샘을 사랑하는 모임'을 대상으로 -

A Study on the Activation Factors of Voluntary Community Activities in Neighborhood Parks - Based on the People Who Love Chamsaem in Sejong City -

  • 김우주 (서울대학교 공과대학 협동과정 도시설계) ;
  • 이차희 (경기연구원) ;
  • 성종상 (서울대학교 환경대학원 환경조경학과)
  • Kim, Woo-Joo (Interdisciplinary Program in Urban Design, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Cha-Hee (Gyeonggi Research Institute) ;
  • Sung, Jong-Sang (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2018.01.17
  • 심사 : 2018.03.14
  • 발행 : 2018.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

최근 도시 공원의 사회적 기능을 강화하고, 지속가능한 유지관리를 위해 적극적인 주민 참여가 요구되고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 지역 주민들이 일상생활공간을 기반으로 형성한 연대의식을 바탕으로 지속적인 참여가 가능한 근린생활권 공원에서 활동하는 자발적 공동체의 형성과정을 근거이론으로 분석하였다. 이를 바탕으로 공동체 활동이 활성화되는데 중요하게 작용하는 요인을 자원, 지역영역, 공동체 역량, 공동체 역할, 공공지원 5가지 측면에서 도출하였다. 연구 결과는 다음과 같다. 1) 생활 밀착형 자원: 공원 내 '참샘'과 같은 생활 밀착형 자원의 발굴이 중요하였다. 이는 강한 애착을 형성시켜 공원 내 매력적인 자원을 지속적으로 활용하기 위한 공동체 활동을 유도하였다. 2) 공통의 일상공간 공유와 확장: 공동체 활동이 근린생활권을 중심으로 이루어지면서 주민사회 내 활동자들의 네트워크가 확장되었다. 이는 지속적인 주민의 관심과 호의적 참여를 이끌어내고, 공동체 활동의 지역적 확장도 이끌어냈다. 3) 일상의 한 부분으로서의 공원관리: 공원관리가 일상의 부분으로 결합되면서 쾌적한 공원관리가 가능하였다. 주민들의 재능을 활용하여 다양한 활동을 진행하고, 고된 노동을 지속적으로 효율화하였다. 4) 주도적 공원관리 활동을 통해 주민과 공공부문을 연결하는 공동체의 리더십: 공동체가 공원관리기관인 공공부문과 이용자집단인 주민들을 연결하는 중간자적 리더 역할을 수행하였다. 5) 공공부문의 역할과 지원: 지속적인 주민 활동이 이루어지는데, 공공부문의 공원 계획과 운영 측면에서 관리자의 주민 주도 활동 지원 의지가 중요하였다. 그리고 공원의 공공관리 시스템 내에서 재정, 교육, 컨설팅 등의 공동체 활동지원이 요구되었다.

Recently, urban parks are required to actively participate with residents in order to strengthen social functions and maintain sustainable management. This study analyzed the formation process of volunteer resident groups (Chamsamo) in the neighborhood parks in which local residents can participate in an ongoing basis based on the solidarity of a daily living space. The important factors in the activation of resident activity are derived from 5 aspects including resources, local area, resident group capacity, resident group role, and public support. The results of the study are as follows. 1) Life-friendly resources: It was important to find life-friendly resources such as 'Chamsaem' in the park. The combined resources of continuous human activities provided various benefits to the residents. This has led to stronger attachment and community activities to continue to utilize attractive resources in the park. 2) Sharing Common Daily Spaces and Expansion: As the Chamsamo activities were centered around the neighborhood, the network of activists in the local community expanded. This led to continued resident interest and favorable participation as well as to the regional expansion of Chamsamo activities. 3) Park management as part of everyday life: Park management became a part of everyday life, and pleasant park management was facilitated by utilizing the talents of the residents, who carried out diverse activities and constantly streamlined their hard labor. 4) Chamsamo's Leadership Linking Residents and the Public Sector through Leading Park Management Activities: Chamsamo served as a middle leader in linking the public sector and its users. 5) Role and Support of the Public Sector: In order to be able to sustain the activities of residents, the government's willingness to support the resident-led activities of the park in planning and operating the public sector was required. In the public management system of the park, support for residents' activities such as financing, education, and consulting was necessary.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Alexander, C., S. Ishikawa and M. Silverstein(1977) A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction. New York: Oxford University Press.
  2. Anuar, M. and M. Saruwono(2013) Obstacles of public participation in the design process of public parks. Journal of Asian Behavioral Studies 3(8): 89-99.
  3. Baek, S. K. and K. H. Park(2014) Associations between characteris- tics of green spaces, physical activity and health. Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 42(3): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2014.42.3.001
  4. Bedimo-Rung, A. L., A. J. Mowen and D. A. Cohen(2005) The significance of parks to physical activity and public health: A conceptual model. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 28(2): 159-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2004.10.024
  5. Brown, G.(2008) A theory of urban park geography. Journal of Leisure Research 40(4): 589-607. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2008.11950154
  6. Charmaz, K.(2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Research. Sage Publications Ltd, London.
  7. Cho, J. H. and Y. G. Kim(2008) Grounded theoric interpretation of residents' conflict occurred in process of promoting a rural community development project. Journal of the Korean Society of Rural Planning 14(2): 1-12.
  8. Cohen, D. A., B. Han, K. P. Derose, S. Williamson, T. Marsh, J. Rudick and T. L. McKenzie(2012) Neighborhood poverty, park use, and park-based physical activity in a Southern California City. Social Science & Medicine 75(12): 2317-2325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.08.036
  9. Cunningham, C. J. and M. A. Jones(2000) How a community use its parks: A case study of Ipswich, Queensland. Australia. Leisure/Loisir, 24(3-4): 233-253.
  10. Forsyth, A. and L. Musacchio(2005) Designing Small Parks: A Manual for Addressing Social and Ecological Concerns. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  11. Freestone, R. and D. Nichols(2004) Realising new leisure opportunities for old urban parks: The internal reserve in Australia. Landscape and Urban Planning 68(1): 109-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.07.001
  12. Galster, G.(2001) On the nature of neighborhood, Urban Studies 38(12): 2111-2124. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980120087072
  13. Gehl, J.(1987) Life between Buildings. Using Public Space. Van Nostrand Reinhold: New York.
  14. Gehl, J. and B. Svarre(2013) How to Study Public Life. Island Press.
  15. Glaser, B. G.(1998) Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions. Sociology Press.
  16. Glaser, B. G. and A. L. Strauss(1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.
  17. Gobster, P. H.(1998) Urban parks as green walls or green magnets? Interracial relations in neighborhood boundary parks. Landscape and Urban Planning 41(1): 43-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00045-0
  18. Gold, S. M.(1977) Neighborhood parks: The nonuse phenomenon. Evaluation Quarterly 1(2): 319-328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X7700100205
  19. Greenhalgh, L. and K. Warpole(1996) People, Park & Cities: A Guide to Current Good Practice in Urban Parks. HMSO. London.
  20. Han, B., D. A. Cohen, K. P. Derose T. Marsh, S. Williamson and L. Raaen(2014) How much neighborhood parks contribute to local resi- dents' physical activity in the City of Los Angeles: A meta-analysis. Preventive Medicine, 69: S106-S110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.08.033
  21. Han, S. Y., H. S. Cho and K. J. Zoh(2015) A study on the roles and ideological development of welfare characteristics in parks. Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 43(1): 69-81. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2015.43.1.069
  22. Hong, Y. J.(2014) Openspace uses in residential neighborhoods of old urban areas. Program in Urban Design Mastercourse in Graduate School Seoul National University.
  23. Huang, S.-C. L.(2006) A study in outdoor interactional spaces in high-rise housing. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78: 193-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.07.008
  24. Hwang, H. Y., W. S. Jeon and D. H. Kim(2009) Residents-participation effect analysis on establishment of Wonheungee Eco-Park in Cheongju. Jonural of Korea Planning Association 44(4): 147-160.
  25. Jeong, Y. B. and U. S. Yoo(2017) A study on relationship between pedestrian use and spatial characteristics in urban linear park. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design 19(1): 77-88.
  26. Kang, H. M.(2015) Neighborhood Openspaces and Physical Activity Patterns, Interdisciplinary Program in Urban Design Graduate School of Seoul National University.
  27. Kazmierczak, A.(2013) The contribution of local parks to neighbourhood social ties. Landscape and Urban Planning 109(1): 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.05.007
  28. Ki, Y. H., S. H. Kim and N. S. Kim(2013) An analysis of the Sungmisan village model as a community wellbeing paradigm: Using grounded theory method. Korean Association of Governmental Studies 47(1): 295-320.
  29. Kim, E. J. and M. G. Kang(2011) Effects of built environment and individual characteristics on health condition. Jonural of Korea Planning Association 27(3): 27-42.
  30. Kim, H. J. and K. H. Ryo(2017) Neighborhood park-use differences between urban and rural dwellers and policy implications. Korean Association for Local Government Studies 19(1): 1-21.
  31. Kim, H. J.(2016) The Development of Community through Common Space and its Meanings. Master's Thesis, KR, Seoul University. Kroea.
  32. Kim, H. R. and S. H. Cho(2015) Comparative analysis of the types and characteristics of urban parks by residents particiation between Korea and Japan. Jonural of Korea Planning Association 50(6): 127-144. https://doi.org/10.17208/jkpa.2015.10.50.6.127
  33. Kim, I. H., N. J. Chang and M. R. Kwon(2007) The Actual Situation of the Planning and Implementation Plan of the Neighborhood Planning of the Housing Environment Improvement Project. Seoul Development Institute.
  34. Kim, J. H., Y. L. Tae, C. Y. Chang and K. M. Kim(2010) Study on the current status and direction of environmental governance around urban forest in Korea: With a focus on the recognition of local government officials. Journal of Korean Forest Society 99(4): 580-589.
  35. Kim, S. H.(2015) Study on Park Management of the Citizen Participation. Ph.D. Dissertation, DongA University. Korea.
  36. Kim, S. K.(2001) Community participatory neighborhood park design: In the case of Yangi Park in Sadang-dong. Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 29(3): 61-69.
  37. Kim, S. K.(2005) Comparative analysis of the types and characteristics of urban parks by residents participation between Korea and Japan. Jonural of Korea Planning Association 50(6): 127-144.
  38. Kim, S. M.(2010) Experience of Exchanging Work in Child Education Among the Housewives, who have College Education Career, in Daegu-city and its Social Implications. Master's Thesis, KR, Kyungpook National University. Korea.
  39. Kim, W. J. and S. H. Shin(2007) Plan to Create Neighborhood Green Spaces with Citizen Participation. The Seoul Institute Press.
  40. Kim, Y. G.(2015) A study on the distributive equity of neighborhood urban park in Seoul viewed from green welfare. Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 42(3): 76-89. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2014.42.3.076
  41. Kim, Y. G., J. S. Sung, S. M. Cho and K. M. Lee(2004) Community participation small park design. Journal of Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 31(1): 78-89.
  42. Kwon, H. W.(2016) Understanding grounded theory. Korean Policy Sciences Review 20(2): 181-216.
  43. Kye, K. S.(2000) Community-Based Improvement of Residential Environment in Urban Area. KR. Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements.
  44. Lee, C. H., Y. R. Tak, M. S. Kim and Y. H. Son(2014) Grounded theory analysis on the role of intermediary organizations for rural tourism. rounded theory analysis on the role of intermediary organizations for rural tourismz. Journal of the Korean Society of Rural Planning. 20(3): 75-88. https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2014.20.3.075
  45. Lee, D. S. and Y. C. Kim(2012) An inquiry on the philosophical backgrounds and methodological characteristics of grounded theory as qualitative research method. The Journal of Yeolin Education 20(2): 1-26.
  46. Lee, K. M. and J. M. Lee(2004) A study on factor promoting social capital in voluntary community of urban park management. Jonural of Korea Planning Association 39(2): 271-284.
  47. Lee, S. H.(2016) Private Participation of Park Management by Urban Park's Social Value Enhancement. Master's Thesis, Department of Landscape Architecture The Graduate School of the University of Seoul. Korea.
  48. Lee, S. Y.(2014) A study on community activity experiences of neighborhood residents. Journal of Korean Academy of Qualitative Research in Social Welfare 8(2): 5-33.
  49. Lim, H. J. and J. J. Shin(2003) A Study on the Block-unit Redevel- opment Method Adaptable to Local Condition. Seoul Development Institute.
  50. Machabee, L. G., J. J. Oleson and A. P. Kinzig(2005) Neighborhood parks uses by phoenix residents: An exploration of socio demographic differences. People, Places, and Parks: Proceedings of the 2005 George Wright Society Conference on Parks, Protected Areas and Cultural Sites. Hancock, Michigan: The George Wright Society.
  51. Mutiara, S. and K. Isami(2012) Characteristic of public small park usage in asia pacific countries: Case study in Jakarta and Yokohama City. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 35: 412-419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.02.106
  52. Oh, K. S. and S. H. Jeong(2005) An assessment of the spatial dis- tribution of urban parks using GIS. Journal of Korea Planning Association 40(3): 189-203.
  53. Pai, I. and M. H. Chang(2006) Citizen participation in park management. Journal of Korean Society for Plants, People and Environment 9(4): 155-162.
  54. Park, S. J.(2011) Study for creating local attractions and its landmarks on the relationship between place and local residents. Jonural of Korea Digital Design 11(1): 581-590. https://doi.org/10.17280/jdd.2011.11.1.055
  55. Peters, K., B. Elands and A. Buijs(2010) Social interactions in urban parks: Stimulating social cohesion? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 9: 93-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2009.11.003
  56. Phillips, E. L.(1996) Parks: Design and Management. New York, US: McGraw-Hill.
  57. Shin, J. J., W. K. Bae and E. J. Kim(2005) A study on residential improvement method through the citizen participation. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design 21(4): 139-146.
  58. Shin, M. H.(2000) Present and prospect of the urban community movement in Korea. Jonural of Center for City and Environment Research 6(6): 51-81.
  59. Shuib, K. B., H. Hashim and N. A. M. Nasir(2015) Community participation strategies in planning for urban parks. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 168: 311-320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.236
  60. Stern, P. N.(1980) Grounded theory methodology: Its uses and processes. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 12(1): 20-23.
  61. Strauss, A. L. and J. Corbin(1990) Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
  62. Strauss, A. L. and J. Corbin(1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory(2nd ed.). Thousand Oak, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
  63. Turan, S. O., M. Pulatkan, D. Beyazli and B. S. Ozen(2016) User evaluation of the urban park design implementation with participatory approach process. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 216: 306-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.12.042
  64. Yoo, N. H., Y. U. Ban and S. K. Jeong(2013) Assessment of the urban park location suitability using gravity model. Jonural of Korea Planning Association 48(4): 331-342.