한국조경학회지 (Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture)

  • 제46권2호
  • /
  • Pages.1-13
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1225-1755(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-9566(eISSN)
한국조경학회 (The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

조경 설계에서 디지털 드로잉의 기능과 역할

Functions and Roles of Digital Landscape Architectural Drawing

  • 이명준 (서울대학교 통합설계/미학연구실)
  • Lee, Myeong-Jun (Integrated Design and Landscape Aesthetics Lab, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2018.01.18
  • 심사 : 2018.02.19
  • 발행 : 2018.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구는 지금까지 조경 드로잉에서 컴퓨터 테크놀로지가 어떠한 역할을 해왔는가를 검토하고, 근래의 디지털드로잉에서 발견되는 사실적 묘사 경향에 관한 쟁점을 진단한 후 대안적 방향을 모색한다. 조경 드로잉의 매체가 손에서 컴퓨터로 이행하는 시기에 드로잉 테크놀로지는 대체로 손 드로잉의 테크닉을 모방하는 기계 도구의 기능을 담당했다. GIS는 레이어 케이크의 절차를 보다 정확하게 효율적으로 처리했고, CAD는 물리 모형을 시공 도면으로 변환했으며, 그래픽 소프트웨어는 콜라주와 몽타주를 보다 쉽게 만들 수 있도록 도왔다. 근래에 디지털 조경 드로잉에는 경관의 외양을 회화와 같이 사실적으로 묘사하려는 경향이 짙다. 그래픽 소프트웨어를 이용하여 사진 재료의 조립 흔적을 지워내 마치 실재 경관을 포착한 사진처럼 보이도록 제작되고 있다. 이러한 사진과 같은 이미지는 대중과의 의사소통에 수월하지만, 경관의 다감각적 특성을 온전하게 구현하기 힘들고, 좀처럼 현실에서 발생하기 힘든 경관의 가장 이상적인 순간을 묘사하여 수용자를 기만하는 경우가 발생하기도 하며, 자칫 최종 결과물처럼 여겨져 드로잉의 생산에만 집중하게 할 우려가 있다. 이에 대한 대안적 방향으로, 경관의 기능 정보를 삼차원으로 모델링하고, 디지털 테크놀로지를 설계 전반 프로세스에서 설계 아이디어를 발전시키는데 활용하며, 서로 다른 드로잉 테크닉과 테크놀로지를 혼용하여 경관의 다양한 국면을 시각화하는 실험이 필요하다.

This work discusses the major roles of digital technologies in the history of landscape architectural drawing, and offers a critique of the dominant trend towards realism in recent digital landscape representations. During the period of transition from conventional drawing tools, computer technologies generally functioned as mechanical tools to imitate prior manual techniques. Specifically, the GIS was served as a mechanical tool to efficiently process the manual layer cake; CAD software generally functioned to translate physical models to two-dimensional construction documents while graphic software generally functioned as a tool to perform processes similar to those of manual collage and montage techniques. Recent digital landscape drawings tend to adopt a realistic depiction like the painting of landscape appearance. In the representations, discernible traces of cutting and assembling are removed via graphic software; thus, the complete representations are perceived as if they were a copy of an actual landscape. The realistic images are an easy way to communicate with the public. However, it is difficult to achieve a full embodiment of all of the multisensory characteristics of a landscape through these visuals. They often deceive viewers by visualizing idealized conditions of not-yet-actualized landscapes and production of the final images takes up a large portion of the overall design process. Alternatively, 3D digital modeling of landscape performance and creative uses of digital technologies during the overall design process, as well as hybridized techniques with different drawing techniques and technologies, provide the opportunity to explore various aspects of a landscape.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Amidon, J.(2005) Moving Horizons: The Landscape Architecture of Kathryn Gustafson and Partners. Basel: Birkhauser.
  2. Amoroso, N., ed.(2015) Representing Landscapes: Digital. London and New York: Routledge.
  3. Anderson, P. F.(1984) Stats on computer use. Landscape Architecture 74(6): 101-102.
  4. Auricoste, I.(1996) The manner of Yves Brunier. In M. Jacques, ed., Yves Brunier: Landscape Architect. Basel: Birkhauser. pp. 15-17.
  5. Belanger, B. and E. Urton(2014) Situating eidetic photomontage in contemporary landscape architecture. Landscape Journal 33(2): 109-126. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.33.2.109
  6. Betsky, A.(2005) The long and winding path: Kathryn Gustafson re-shapes landscape architecture. In J. Amidon, Moving Horizons: The Landscape Architecture of Kathryn Gustafson and Partners. Basel: Birkhauser. pp. 7-13.
  7. Byrd, W. T. and S. S. Nelson(1985) On drawing. Landscape Architecture 75(4): 44-54.
  8. Chrisman, N.(2006) Charting the Unknown: How Computer Mapping at Harvard Became GIS. Redlands, Calif.: ESRI Press.
  9. Corner, J.(1992) Representation and landscape: Drawing and making in the landscape medium. Word & Image: A Journal of Verbal/ Visual Enquiry 8(3): 243-275. https://doi.org/10.1080/02666286.1992.10435840
  10. Corner, J.(1999a) Introduction: Recovering landscape as a critical cultural practice. In J. Corner, ed., Recovering Landscape: Essays in Contemporary Landscape Architecture. New York: Princeton Architectural Press. pp. 1-26.
  11. Corner, J.(1999b) Eidetic operations and new landscapes. In J. Corner, ed., Recovering Landscape: Essays in Contemporary Landscape Architecture. New York: Princeton Architectural Press. pp. 153-169.
  12. Corner, J.(1999c) The agency of mapping: Speculation, critique and Invention. In D. Cosgrove, ed., Mappings. London: Reaktion Books. pp. 213-252.
  13. Danahy, J. W. and R. Wright.(1988) Exploring design through 3-dimensional simulations. Landscape Architecture 78(5): 64-71.
  14. Ervin, S. M.(1994) Digital terrain modeling. Landscape Architecture 84(1): 31-35.
  15. Fillion, O.(1996) A conversation with Rem Koolhaas. In M. Jacques, ed., Yves Brunier: Landscape Architect. Basel: Birkhauser. pp. 89-90.
  16. Geuze, A.(2000) Introduction. In L. Molinari, ed., West 8. Milano: Skira Architecture Library. pp. 9-13.
  17. Girot, C.(2013) About topology. Topos 82: 24-29.
  18. Herrington, S.(2010) The nature of Ian McHarg's science. Landscape Journal 29(1): 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.29.1.1
  19. Jeong, W.(2010) Design tool: Freedom or restriction?. Environment & Landscape Architecture 262: 172-177.
  20. Jeong, W. and J. Corner(2005) Fresh Kills Park design, Staten Island, New York. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 33(1): pp. 93-108.
  21. Kim, A.(2009) Representation and expression: Drawing and imagination, and space. Environment & Landscape Architecture 257: 184-189.
  22. Kim, Y.(2013) Why did they a Korean traditional landscape painting?. In J. Pae et al., Criticism on the International Competition for the Master Plan of Yongsan Park, Korea. Goyang: Namudosi. pp. 82-105.
  23. Kingery-Page, K. and H. Hahn(2012) The aesthetics of digital representation: Realism, abstraction and kitsch. Journal of Landscape Architecture 7(2): 68-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/18626033.2012.746091
  24. Kulak, A. J.(1985) Prospect: The case for CADD. Landscape Architecture 75(4): 144.
  25. Kullmann, K.(2014) Hyper-realism and loose-reality: The limitations of digital realism and alternative principles in landscape design visualization. Journal of Landscape Architecture 9(3): 20-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/18626033.2014.968412
  26. Lee, M. and J. Pae(2018) Photo-fake conditions of digital landscape representation. Visual Communication 17(1): 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357217734825
  27. Lee, M.(2017a) A Historical Critique on 'Photo-fake' Digital Representation in Landscape Architectural Drawing. Ph.D. Dissertation. Seoul National University.
  28. Lee, M.(2017b) James Corner's theory and practice of representation: Characteristics and functions of landscape architectural drawing. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 45(4): 118-130. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2017.45.4.118
  29. Lee, S.(2006) A Study on the Contemporary Korean Landscape Architecture in View of Design Media with a Reference to Competition Entries. Ph.D. Dissertation. Seoul National University.
  30. Levy, L.(1998) Kathryn Gustafson: Sculpting the Land. Washington, D.C.: Spacemaker Press.
  31. Lindhult, M. S.(1988) The road beyond CAD. Landscape Architecture 78(5): 40-45.
  32. Lindhult, M. S. and N. T. Dines(1985) Perspective sketching with microcomputers. Landscape Architecture 75(4): 56-57.
  33. Lynn, G., ed.(1993) Folding in Architecture. Architectural Design 63(3/4).
  34. M'Closkey, K.(2013) Introduction. In K. M'Closkey, Unearthed: The Landscapes of Hargreaves Associates. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. pp. 1-23.
  35. M'Closkey, K.(2014) Structuring relations: From montage to model in COMPOSITE IMaging. In C. Waldheim, and A. Hansen, eds., Composite Landscapes: Photomontage and Landscape Architecture. Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz Verlag. pp. 116-131.
  36. Manovich, L.(2013) Software Takes Command. New York and London: Bloomsbury Academic.
  37. McHarg, I.(1969) Design with Nature. New York: The Natural History Press.
  38. McHarg, I.(1995) In memoriam: Ian McHarg reflects on the past, present and future of GIS. GEO World June 2001. [website] http://www.gisknowledge.net/topic/spatial_thinking_and_gis/geoworld_interview_ian_mcharg_95.pdf. Originally published in GIS World, October 1995.
  39. McHarg, I. L.(1996) A Quest for Life: An Autobiography. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  40. McHarg, I. L., A. H. Johnson and J. Berger(1998) A case study in ecological planning: The Woodlands, Texas. In I. L. McHarg and F. Steiner, eds., To Heal the Earth: Selected Writings of Ian L. McHarg. Washington, DC: Island Press. pp. 242-263.
  41. Nickerson, D. and M. Arneson(1981) Technik: Previewing ski-slopes by computer. Landscape Architecture 71(6): 738-739.
  42. Olin, L.(2008) More than wriggling your wrist (or your mouse): Thinking, seeing, and drawing. In M. Treib, ed., Drawing/Thinking: Confronting an Electronic Age. London and New York: Routledge. pp. 82-99.
  43. Orland, B.(1988) Video imaging: A powerful tool for visualization and analysis. Landscape Architecture 78(5): 78-88.
  44. Oxman, R. and R. Oxman(2014) Theories of the Digital in Architecture. London and New York: Routledge.
  45. Pae, J.(2007) Traversing design strategies, media and techniques of Seoul forest competition. In J. Pae, Beyond the Landscape Architecture. Paju: Jogyeong.
  46. Palmer, J. and E. Buhmann(1994) A status report on computers. Landscape Architecture 84(7): 54-55.
  47. Picon, A.(2013) Substance and structure II: The digital culture of landscape architecture. Harvard Design Magazine 36: 124-129.
  48. Raxworthy, J.(2017) The discourse of the digital in contemporary landscape architecture. Journal of Landscape Architecture 12(2): 88-93.
  49. Rieder, K.(2008) Modeling, physical and virtual. In M. Treib, ed., Representing Landscape Architecture. London and New York: Taylor & Francis. pp. 168-187.
  50. Rovira, R.(2015) The site plan is dead: Long live the site plan. In N. Amoroso, ed., Representing Landscape: Digital. London and New York: Routledge. pp. 98-105.
  51. Sarky, B. G.(1988) Confessions of a computer convert. Landscape Architecture 78(5): 72-75.
  52. Schwarzer, M.(2013) Landscape navigator. Harvard Design Magazine 36: 136-144.
  53. Sipes, J. L.(1994) Simulating natural phenomena. Landscape Architecture 84(5): 30-32.
  54. Sipes, J. L.(1996) Creating digital worlds: A new generation of com- puter programs makes it possible to simulate the visual complexities of real landscapes. Landscape Architecture 86(11): 48-53.
  55. Spirn, A. W.(2000) Ian McHarg, landscape architecture, and en- vironmentalism: Ideas and methods in context. In M. Conan, ed., Environmentalism in Landscape Architecture. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection. pp. 97-114.
  56. Steiner, F.(1998) Revealing the genius of the place: Methods and techniques for ecological planning. In I. L. McHarg and F. Steiner, eds., To Heal the Earth: Selected Writings of Ian L. McHarg. Washington, DC: Island Press. pp. 203-211.
  57. Steinitz, C., P. Parker and L. Jordan(1976) Hand-drawn overlays: Their history and prospective uses. Landscape Architecture September 1976: 444-455.
  58. Tai, L.(2003) Assessing the impact of computer use on landscape ar- chitecture professional practice: Efficiency, effectiveness, and design creativity. Landscape Journal 22(2): 113-125. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.22.2.113
  59. Treib, M.(2008a) Introduction. In M. Treib, ed., Drawing/Thinking: Confronting an Electronic Age. London and New York: Routledge. pp. viii-xi.
  60. Treib, M.(2008b) Introduction. In M. Treib, ed., Representing Landscape Architecture. London and New York: Taylor & Francis. pp. xviii-xxi.
  61. Waldheim, C. and A. Hansen, eds.(2014) Composite Landscapes: Photomontage and Landscape Architecture. Ostfildern: Hatje Cantz Verlag.
  62. Walliss, J., and H. Rahmann(2016) Landscape Architecture and Digital Technologies: Re-conceptualising Design and Making. London and New York: Routledge.
  63. Walliss, J., Z. Hong, H. Rahmann and J. Sieweke(2014) Pedagogical foundations: Deploying digital techniques in design/research practice. Journal of Landscape Architecture 9(3): 72-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/18626033.2015.968421
  64. Weller, R. and M. Talarowski, eds.(2014) Transacts: 100 Years of Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning at the School of Design of the University of Pennsylvania. San Francisco: Applied Research and Design Publishing.
  65. Yaro, R. D.(1998) Foreword. In I. L. McHarg, and F. Steiner, eds., To Heal the Earth: SelectedWritings of Ian L. McHarg. Washington, DC: Island Press. pp. ix-xii.
  66. Zoh, K.(2010) Prospect of Korean landscape urbanism: Dilemma and potential. In Proceedings of International Symposium of KILA 2010; Landscape Urbanism: The New Paradigm of Landscape Architecture and Urbanism for Green-led Regeneration in the 21st Century, Seoul. pp. 203-213.
  67. http://www.dsrny.com/projects/zaryadye-park
  68. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Lmx8dwk34U