DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Diffusion or confusion of innovation - Smart clothing potential adopters' perspectives -

혁신의 확산 혹은 혼란 - 스마트 의류 잠재적 채택자 관점 -

  • Lee, Kyu-Hye (Dept. of Clothing and Textiles, Hanyang University) ;
  • Ju, Naan (Dept. of Clothing and Textiles, Hanyang University)
  • Received : 2018.03.30
  • Accepted : 2018.04.19
  • Published : 2018.04.30

Abstract

As the next generation of smartphone and tablet computers, wearable devices are currently being developed and available in market in various forms. Smart clothing is a wearable device that holds the greatest potential for future development but low in market penetration. This study was designed to identify factors that influence adoption and diffusion of smart clothing. In-depth interviews with potential consumers who were knowledgeable about and interested in smart clothing were conducted. A semantic network analysis method was used. The results showed that consumers perceived smart clothing as a garment rather than as a type of wearable device and had a positive perception of smart apparel as more convenient and advanced than functional apparel. At the same time, however, consumers had a negative perception of smart clothing as unnecessary, ugly, and injurious to health. Consumers also worried that wearing smart apparel over long periods of time would negatively impact their health. Factors affecting resistance to smart apparel included low utility, perceived risk, and lack of aesthetic completeness. Usefulness and convenience were factors that affected the acceptance of smart clothing. The innovativeness of the product was more influential than consumer innovativeness in the process of adoption and diffusion of smart clothing.

Keywords

References

  1. Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1999). Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies?. Decision Sciences, 30(2), 361-391. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb01614.x
  2. Buehrer, T. (2013, October 3). Ready to wear... tech? Most consumers aren't. Kantar US Insight, Retrieved June 8, 2017, from http://us.kantar.com/tech/mobile/2013/attitudes-toward-wearable-tech
  3. Chae, J. M. (2010). The extended technology acceptance model according to smart clothing types. Korean Journal of Human Ecology, 19(2), 375-387. doi:10.5934/KJHE.2010.19.2.375
  4. Chae, J.-M., Cho, H.-S., & Lee, J.-H. (2009). A study on consumer acceptance toward the commercialized smart clothing. Science of Emotion & Sensibility, 12(2), 181-192.
  5. Cheon, S. J. (2016, September 2). 실리콘밸리에서 바라본 '입는 IoT' 현주소 [Present state of 'IoT wearable device' viewed from Silicon Valley]. Kotra, Retrieved June 11, 2017, from https://news.kotra.or.kr/user/globalBbs/kotranews/4/globalBbsDataView.do?setIdx=243&dataIdx=151681
  6. Colloquy. (2016, March 29). Passing fad or cool nerdy: Colloquy research shows 63% of U.S. consumers wary of wearable prices. Colloquy, Retrieved April 20, 2018 from https://www.colloquy.com/latest-news/passing-fad-or-cool-nerdy-colloquy-research-shows-63-of-u-s-consumers-waryof-wearable-prices/%20
  7. Ellen P. S., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (1991). Resistance to technological innovations: An examination of the role of self-efficacy and performance satisfaction. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19(4), 297-307. doi:10.1177/009207039101900401
  8. Gatignon, H., & Robertson, T. S. (1985). A propositional inventory for new diffusion research. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(4), 849-867. doi:10.1086/209021
  9. Goldsmith, R., & Flynn, L. R. (1992). Identifying innovators in consumer product markets. European Journal of Marketing, 26(12), 42-55. doi:10.1108/03090569210022498
  10. Hwang, C., Chung, T.-L., & Sanders, E. A. (2016). Attitudes and purchase intentions for smart clothing: Examining US consumers' functional, expressive, and aesthetic needs for solar-powered clothing. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 34(3), 207-222. doi:10.1177/0887302X16646447
  11. Jeong, S. W., & Roh, J.-S. (2016). A study on acceptance of smart fashion products: An empirical test of an extended technology acceptance model. The Research Journal of the Costume Culture, 24(2), 263-272. doi:10.7741/rjcc.2016.24.2.263
  12. Kang, K.-Y., & Jin, H.-J. (2007). A study on consumers' clothing buying intention adopted by the technology acceptance model. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 31(8), 1211-1221. doi:10.5850/JKSCT.2007.31.8.1211
  13. Kim, S. H. (2017, March 1). 섬유/패션-전자/IT-정부 디딤돌 놓여졌다 [Textiles/Fashion-Electronics/IT-Government, a stepping stone was laid]. The Industry News, Retrieved March 18, 2018 from http://www.tinnews.co.kr/sub_read.html?uid=13018§ion=sc1§ion2=%C7%F9%C8%B8%A1%A4%C1%B6%C7%D5
  14. Korea Creative Content Agency. (2012). 휴먼-디바이스 인터액션 기술 [Human-device interaction technology]. CT Insight, 27, 1-40. Retrieved February 1, 2017 from https://www.kocca.kr/knowledge/publication/ct/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2012/12/26/S0JxbPFcxU4G.pdf
  15. Kotter, J. P. (1999). John P. Kotter on What leaders really do. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  16. Llamas, R., Ubrani, J., & Shirer, M. (2017, June 21). Worldwide wearables market to nearly double by 2021, according to IDC. IDC, Retrieved March 11, 2018 from https://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS42818517
  17. Malmivaara, M. (2009). The emergence of wearable computing. In J. McCann, & D. Bryson (Eds.), Smart clothes and wearable technology (pp. 3-24). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  18. McCann, J. (2009). End-user based design of innovative smart clothing. In J. McCann, & D. Bryson (Eds.), Smart clothes and wearable technology (pp. 45-69). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  19. McIntyre, A. (2017, August 2). Hype cycle for wearable devices, 2017. Gartner, Retrieved November 11, 2017 from https://www.gartner.com/doc/3776665/hype-cycle-wearable-devices-
  20. Midgley, D. F., & Dowling, G. R. (1978). Innovativeness: The concept and its measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 4(4), 229-242. doi:10.1086/208701
  21. Moore, G. A. (1991). Crossing the chasm: Marketing and selling technology products to mainstream customers. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
  22. Morgan Stanley. (2014, November 19). Wearable Devices: The Internet of Things Becomes Personal. Morgan Stanley Blue Paper, Retrieved June 29, 2017 from http://byinnovation.eu/wpcontent/uploads/2014/11/MORGAN-STANLEY-BLUE-PAPER_Internet-of-Things.pdf
  23. Mou, J., & Shin, D. (2018). Effects of social popularity and time scarcity on online consumer behaviour regarding smart healthcare products: An eye-tracking approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 74-89. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.049
  24. Noh, M.-J., & Park, H.-H. (2011). Acceptance of the smart clothing according to trend and information innovation. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 11(11), 350-363. doi:10.5392/JKCA.2011.11.11.350
  25. Oreg, S. (2003). Resistance to change: Developing an individual differences measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 680-693. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.680
  26. Ostlund, L. E. (1974). Perceived innovation attributes as predictors of innovativeness. Journal of Consumer Research, 1(2), 23-29. doi:10.1086/208587
  27. Park, H. (2014). 패션디자인과 ICT 융복합 활성화를 통한 패션의류산업의 신성장 전략 [New growth strategy of fashion clothing industry through fashion design and ICT convergence invigoration] (ISSUE PAPER 2014-357). Retrieved April 13, 2018 from Korea Institute for Industrial Economics & Trade website: https://library.kiet.re.kr/CORE/?moduleName=_core.KrmsSearchDetail&control_no=39404
  28. Park, H. H., & Noh, M. J. (2012). The influence of innovativeness and price sensitivity on purchase intention of smart wear. Journal of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles, 36(2), 218-230. doi:10.5850/JKSCT.2012.36.2.218
  29. Park, H. W., & Leydesdorff, L. (2004). Understanding the KrKwic: A computer program for the analysis of Korean text. Journal of the Korean Data Analysis Society, 6(5), 1377-1387.
  30. Perry, A. (2018). Exploring from creators' perspectives issues and solutions about knowledge, difficulties, and disposal in making smart clothing designs. International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 11(1), 129-137. doi:10.1080/17543266.2017.1332246
  31. Ram, S. (1987). A model of innovation resistance. Advances in Consumer Research, 14, 208-212.
  32. Ram, S., & Sheth, J. N. (1989). Consumer resistance to innovations: The marketing problem and its solutions. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 6(2), 5-14. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000002542
  33. Rhee, E. Y. (1997). 패션마케팅 [Fashion marketing] (2nd ed.). Paju: Gyomoonsa.
  34. Robertson, T. S. (1971). Innovative behavior and communication. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  35. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York, NY: The Free Press.
  36. Sheth, J. N. (1981). Psychology of innovation resistance: The less developed concept (LDC) in diffusion research. Research in Marketing, 4, 273-282.
  37. Sheth, J. N., & Ram, S. (1989). Bringing innovation to market: How to break corporate and customer barriers. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  38. Shim, S. M. (2014, January 10). 2014 웨어러블 디바이스 산업백서: 비즈니스 수익 모델을 중심으로 [2014 Wearable device industrial report]. Digieco, Retrieved December 8, 2017 from http://www.digieco.co.kr/KTData/Report/FILE/PDF/2014%20웨어러블%20디바이스%20산업백서201401141389659103779.pdf
  39. Tigert, D. J., Ring, L. J., & King, C. W. (1976). Fashion involvement and buying behavior: A methodological study. Advances in Consumer Research, 3, 46-52.
  40. Wang, W., & Rada, R. (1998). Structured hypertext with domain semantics. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 16(4), 372-412. doi:10.1145/291128.291132
  41. Yang, K. (2012). Consumer technology traits in determining mobile shopping adoption: An application of the extended theory of planned behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 19(5), 484-491. doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2012.06.003
  42. Yoo, P. H., & Lee, S. H. (1994). A study on the innovation resistance of consumers in adoption process of new product: Concentrated on innovation resistance model. Korean Management Review, 23(3), 217-250.
  43. Zaltman, G. & Wallendorf, M. (1979). Consumer behavior: Basic findings and management implications. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

Cited by

  1. Perceptions and Resistance to Accept Smart Clothing: Moderating Effect of Consumer Innovativeness vol.11, pp.7, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11073211
  2. 인터넷 쇼핑환경에서의 소비자 혼란과 쇼핑 피로감이 부정적 구매행동에 미치는 영향 vol.29, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.29049/rjcc.2021.29.4.505