The Korean Journal of Food And Nutrition (한국식품영양학회지)

The Korean Society of Food and Nutrition (한국식품영양학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Importance-Satisfaction Analysis of a Dietary Life Education Program - Focusing on Dietary Life Education Program Participants in Seoul and Gyeonggi -

식생활교육 프로그램의 중요도-만족도 분석 - 서울·경기 식생활교육 프로그램 참여자를 중심으로 -

  • Park, Suk-Hyun (Major in Traditional Dietary Life Food, Graduate School of Traditional Culture and Arts, Sookmyung Women's University) ;
  • Jeong, Hee Sun (Major in Traditional Dietary Life Food, Graduate School of Traditional Culture and Arts, Sookmyung Women's University)
  • 박숙현 (숙명여자대학교 전통문화예술대학원 전통식생활문화전공) ;
  • 정희선 (숙명여자대학교 전통문화예술대학원 전통식생활문화전공)
  • Received : 2017.10.16
  • Accepted : 2018.03.31
  • Published : 2018.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the elements that are required and that need improvement in the contents of dietary life education and the educational environment by analyzing the importance-satisfaction of a dietary life education program for dietary life education trainees. The results of the rank test for the satisfactory elements of dietary life education were in the order of competence of instructors, educational contents, time of education, educational environment and affordability of tuition. The importance-satisfaction analysis of the contents and construction of the dietary life education program showed that "suitable contents for the theme of the class", "contents and construction of practice class", "diversity of practice menu" and "diversity of educational contents" had high importance and satisfaction scores and therefore, could be maintained at their current levels. Meanwhile, "adequacy of class time" and "contents and construction of theory class" showed low importance and satisfaction scores, requiring a little effort. Whereas, "time and construction of group practice", "structure of textbook for class" and "duration of course and number of classes" showed relatively low satisfaction compared to importance, requiring major efforts for improvement. Similarly, analysis of the lecture element from dietary life education showed that "professional lecture by instructors", "lectures suitable for themes" and "lecture applicable in real life" had relatively low satisfaction compared to importance, requiring major efforts for improvement. In addition, analysis of the educational environment from dietary life education showed that "adequacy of lecture room space", "cooking equipment", "diversity of cooking utensils" and "sanitary condition of cooking utensils" also require major efforts for improvement. Therefore, dietary life education should not be executed with a simple delivery of knowledge but with both theory and practice classes to increase its application in real life, and active and specific efforts are required to nurture professional instructors and establish educational strategies.

Keywords

References

  1. Bak HJ, Kim HS. 2016. A study of general educational quality factors, satisfaction, and loyalty - Focused on general courses related to dietary life - Culin Soci & Hospitality Res 22:155-165 https://doi.org/10.20878/cshr.2016.22.3.013
  2. Cho CB, Choi RM, Kim SY. 2017. A study on the education of dietary life that affects the educational performance and its results. J Foodserv Manag Soc of Korean 20:277-299
  3. Hong SK. 2011. A study on processed food purchasing behavior and satisfaction according to the urban housewives' food-related lifestyle. Doctoral Dissertation, Kyonggi Univ. Korea
  4. Han JS, Kim SS, Go MA. 2015. Influences of dietary education activity on education satisfaction and self-respect. Korean J Culin Res 21:236-250
  5. Her SH. 2013. Eating behavior, nutrition knowledge, and educational needs of the food and nutrition of elementary school students in the Gyeungnam province. Korean J of Community Nutr 18:11-24 https://doi.org/10.5720/kjcn.2013.18.1.11
  6. Jeon SK. 2010. Educational meanings and effective practical plans of school dietary life education. J Korean Home Econo Educ 22:117-135
  7. Jeon YM. 2010. A study on the interest and satisfaction of parents on the effect of cooking programs for children according to the types of educational institutions. Korean J Culin Res 16:137-151
  8. Jung IK. 2005. A study on perception of teachers on the nutrition education in elementary school curriculum. J Korean Home Econo Educ 17:73-85
  9. Jung KA. 2016. The development and evaluation of dietary education program for preservice elementary teachers. J Korean Pract Arts Educ 29:95-114 https://doi.org/10.20954/jkpae.2016.09.29.3.95
  10. Kang MH. 2012. Activation method and actual condition of dietary life education in household. Master's Thesis, Sookmyung Women's Univ. Korea
  11. Kim HJ. 2013. A study on the current status and exploring the new possibility od dietary education for school children - Focusing on sensory education -. J Korean Pract Arts Educ 26:59-82
  12. Kim HJ. 2015. 21C dietary life education, What we should do?: Focusing on green dietary life education and seasonal foods. The Korea Association of Practical Arts Education. Symposium's Collection of Dissertations. pp.133-139
  13. Kim JY, Sim KH. 2011. The actual and recognition of dietary life education in elementary school after execution of the dietary life education support act. Korea J Food & Nutr 24:295-305 https://doi.org/10.9799/ksfan.2011.24.3.295
  14. Kim SH. 2013. A study for the effects of student's educational satisfaction of cooking class on happiness of personal and family. Master's Thesis, Woosong Univ. Korea
  15. Kim YH. 2010. A study on the eating behaviour and nutrition knowledge of middle school students and satisfaction of dietary life instryction in technology.home economics subject. J Korean Home Econo Educ 22:117-128
  16. Kim YH. 2012. A survey on the nutrition knowledge, dietary behavior and satisfaction of dietary education of hight school female students. J Korean Home Econo Educ 24:21-36
  17. Kim YH. 2013. A survey of the cognition on teaching consulting and dietary class of home economics teachers. J Korean Home Econo Educ 25:1-18
  18. Kim YK. 2010. Parent's behavior and perception of their kids' snacking behavior and dietary life education. Korean J Soc Food Sci 26:596-602
  19. Lee HJ. 2011. Current cooking classes at community centers and promotional plans for the cooking classes according to dood-related lifestyle. Master's Thesis, Sookmyung Women's Univ. Korea
  20. Lee HW, Na YS, Cho MS. 2016. Development and evaluation of dietary education program focused on slow life in school children. J Korean Soc Food Cult 31:111-120 https://doi.org/10.7318/KJFC/2016.31.2.111
  21. Lee IO, Na JK. 2014. Effects of food - related lifestyle on consumer nutrition attitude and food preference - Focused on a married woman with young children -. J Foodserv Manag Soc of Korea 17:201-227
  22. Lee SM. 2013. Effects of a healthly diet lifestyle and the desire to improve one's health on the demand for healing-experience. Master's Thesis, Sookmyung Women's Univ. Korea
  23. Lin HB, Lee SS. 2016. A study of Korean consumers on dietary satisfaction to sentiment index about food safety. J Korean Home Management Assoc 34:15-26
  24. Min EH, Ryu SH, 2012. Effect of green food education program on elementary school student's attitude to health, environment and consideration. J Korean Pract Arts Educ 18:45-60 https://doi.org/10.17055/jpaer.2012.18.4.45
  25. Park SH, Jeong HS. 2016. Effects of dietary life application according to preferred dietary life education type on quality of life - Focus on participants of dietary life education programs in seoul and Gyeonggi province -. J East Asian Soc Dietary Life 27:268-279
  26. Rah YA, Kang MJ, Lee SH, Kim JY. 2015. Nutrition intake according to food and exercise habits in female college students of Yang-Ju si. Korean J Culin Res 21:284-293
  27. Sim KH. 2011. A survey on the recognition and satisfaction of Korean herbal foods according to dietary behavior in lifestyle. Korean J Culin Res 17:39-58
  28. Sin KO, Choi KS, 2013. Study on anthropometric characteristics, nutrient intake behaviors, and healthly dietary habits of male college students according to their majors. Korea J Food & Nutr 26:163-176 https://doi.org/10.9799/ksfan.2013.26.2.163
  29. Siniscalchi JM, Beale EK, Fortuna A. 2008. Using importance-performance analysis to evaluate training. Performance Improvement 47:30-35
  30. Tak MG, Lee JE. 2015. Dietary Life Education and Implication of Major Advanced Countries, World Agriculture. vol. 179, Korea Rural Economic Institute. pp.7-33